Advertisement

The World Bank’s “Effective State” in East Asia

  • Gerard Greenfield
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 5)

Abstract

In these turbulent times, the World Bank itself appears to be in transition. For decades the significant role of the state in East Asian economic development posed a serious challenge to the Bank’s free market agenda, prompting a struggle over how to explain East Asian economic ‘miracles’. The outcome was the Bank’s best-seller, The East Asian Miracle, published in 1993. It was presented as a new discovery, and though it continued to be a contentious issue within the Bank, it expressed a reluctant recognition that the state played a role in fostering economic growth. While many saw this as a catalyst for change in the World Bank’s neoliberal agenda, the changes which followed were very gradual, contrasting sharply with the dramatic changes in thinking and policy that the Bank requires of its debtors under “shock therapy” and structural adjustment. Continuing to work within a neoliberal paradigm, the Bank misinterpreted the development experience in East Asia in fundamental ways. However, this is not simply a matter of getting the facts wrong about the East Asian ‘miracles’. The World Bank’s particular (mis)interpretation of how countries like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong developed largely shapes its lending policies, projects and policy advice in countries such as China, Cambodia, India, Vietnam and the Philippines. For example, as discussed below, the World Bank misinterprets (and misrepresents) the impact of structural adjustment in Hong Kong on working people as a smooth process in which people easily moved from factory jobs to service sector jobs. If we compare this to the Bank’s policy advice on labour flexibility in China, we can see that the same logic which underlies its explanation of the Hong Kong experience now shapes the Bank’s proposals for labour market deregulation and restructuring in China.

Keywords

Trade Union Migrant Worker Poverty Reduction Corporal Punishment Authoritarian Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aditjondro, George (1994). In the Shadow of Mount Ramelau: The impact of the occupation of East Timor. Leiden: Indonesian Documentation and Informater Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja, Vinod, Bidani, Benu, Ferreira, Franciso, & Walton, Michael (1997).Everyone’s Miracle? Revisiting Poverty and Inequality in East Asia, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Alcid, Mary Lou (1996). The Costs of Labour Exports. Asian Migrant Forum, 11, November.Google Scholar
  4. Asian Monitor (1988).No-Jo, Min-Ju South Korea’s New Trade Unions: The Struggle for Free Trade Unions. Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Center.Google Scholar
  5. Azu, Masumi (1996).Labour Imporation Schemes: Human and Labour Rights Havoc? Asian Migrant Forum, 11, November.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, Mark T (1997). The triumph of the East? The East Asian Miracle and post-Cold War capitalism. In Mark T. Berger and Douglas A. Border (eds), The Rise of East Asia: Critical Visions of the Pacific Century. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chiu, Stephen W.K. and Lee, Ching Kwan (1997).Withering Away of the Hong Kong Dream? Women Workers under Industrial Restructuring. Occasional Paper No. 61. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Chronology of a strike. Asian Labour Update, 23, November 1996–March 1997, p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. Forum on Human Rights and Development (1995).Stability and Unity on a Culture of Fear: Indonesia 50 Years After Independence. Bangkok: Forum-Asia.Google Scholar
  10. Gietzelt, Dale (1989).The Indonesianisation of West Papua. Oceania, 59(3), pp. 201–21.Google Scholar
  11. Globalisation Thriving on Women Migrants, Asian Migrant Forum, 11, November 1996, p. 40.Google Scholar
  12. Greenfield, Gerald (1994).The development of capitalism in Vietnam. In Between Globalism and Nationalism, Socialist Register 1994. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greenfield, Gerald (1995).Between discipline and dignity: Strikes in Vietnam. AsianLabour Update, 19, August–October.Google Scholar
  14. Greenfield, Gerald (1997).Governmental Livelihood Assistance & Non-governmental Assistance for Day Labourers and the Homeless: Perspectives on Poverty Alleviation Strategies in Japan.A Report for the Study on Alternatives for Poverty Alleviation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Department of Applied Social Studies, Hong Kong Polytechnic University & the Hong Kong Social Security Society.Google Scholar
  15. Han, Dongfang (1997).Workers: The great losers in China’s reform process. In At What Price? Workers in China. Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Center.Google Scholar
  16. Hart-Landsberg, Martin (1993).The Rush to Development: Economic Change and Political Struggle in South Korea. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hildyard, Nicholas (1996).Public risk, private profit: The World Bank and the private sector. The Ecologist, 26, July–August, pp. 176–178.Google Scholar
  18. Ho, Shuet Ying (1990).Taiwan — After a Long Silence: The emerging new unions of Taiwan. Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Center.Google Scholar
  19. Kolko, Gabriel (1997).Vietnam: Anatomy of a Peace. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwan, Shek Ping (1997).China’s labour safety and health standards. Change. June.Google Scholar
  21. Leung, Apo (1997).Labour Rights in the Pearl River Delta”, At What Price? Workers in China Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Center.Google Scholar
  22. Monbiot, George (1989). The transmigration fiasco. The Geographical Magazine, 61, May.Google Scholar
  23. Naowarat, Suksamran (1997).Claiming the right to have a say. Bangkok Post, February 11.Google Scholar
  24. Nguyen Ngoc Chinh (1993).Legamex equitisation showing early success. Vietnam Investment Review, July, pp. 12–18.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (1997).Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Phong, Thang (1993).Business undertaking a motive of production”, Vietnamese Trade Unions.Proceedings of the International Conference for Toy Workers’ Health and Safety, January 9–10, 1996, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Center, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Rodrik, Dani (1994).King Kong meets Godzilla: The World Bank and The East Asia Miracle. In A. Fishlow, C. Gwin, S. Haggard, D. Rodrik and R. Wade (Eds.), Miracle or Design? Lessons from the East Asian Experience. Washington: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  28. Syed, Hussein Ali (1995).Economic Take-off: Trade unions in Malaysia. In Henk Thomas (ed.) Globalisation and Third World Trade Unions: The Challenge of Rapid Economic Change. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Tan, Pek Leng (1997).Capitalist Growth in Malaysia. In Vinod Raina, Aditi Chowdhury and Sumit Chowdhury (Eds.), The Dispossessed: Victims of Development in Asia. Hong Kong: Asian Regional Exchange for New Alternatives.Google Scholar
  30. Teaching in China: A Crisis looms. China Labour Bulletin, 26, May 1996, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  31. Vinod, Ahuja, Benu Bidani, Francisco Ferreira and Michael Walton (1997).Everyone’s Miracle? Revisiting Poverty and Inequality in East Asia. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Woodside, Alexander (1993).The Asia-Pacific Idea as a Mobilization Myth. In Arif Dirlik (ed.) What is in a Rim? Critical Perspectives on the Pacific Region Idea Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
  33. World Bank (1985).The World Bank Annual Report 1985. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. World Bank (1993).Vietnam: Transition to the Market. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. World Bank (1995).World Bank Development Report 1995: Workers in an Integrating World. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. World Bank (1996).Involving Workers in East Asia’s Growth. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Work Bank (1997a). World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. World Bank Country Operations Division, China and Mongolia Department (1997b)Income Inequality in China. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerard Greenfield

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations