Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Industrial Policy Agenda 2000 and Beyond — Experience, Theory and Policy

  • Chapter
Book cover Industrial Policies After 2000

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought ((RETH,volume 72))

Abstract

The new technical and infrastructural opportunities of tele-information and telecommunication, new global transport (combined with low relative prices for the use of natural goods), new forms of production and management of value-added chains and —Last not least —the global trend of withdrawal of the national governments from their responsibilities to balance economy, society and natural environment, have changed the world dramatically since the eighties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, F. and S.D. Gupta 1997. The Political Economy of Globalization: An Introduction. In: S.D. Gupta ed. 1–12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, W. 1996. “On the Tension between Regional and Industrial Policies”, International Regional Science Review, Vol. 19, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. and P. Petit 1996. “New Scale and Scope for Industrial Policies in the 1990s”, International Review of Applied Economics,Vol. 10, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. 1998. “An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economic Development”, paper presented at the Economic Geography Research Group Seminar, London, July 3, Durham: University of Durham, to Appear, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. and J. Hausner 1997. Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. In id., eds. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. and J. Hausner eds. 1997. Beyond Market and Hierarchy. Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Cheltenham, UK, Lyme, US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. and R. Marchionatti 1998. “Technological and Organizational Change in a Process of Industrial Rejuvenation: The Case of the Italian Cotton Textile Industry”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1959. “Towards a Theory of Price Adjustment”. In The Allocation of Economic Resources, M. Abramowitz ed., Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B.T. 1996 “Industrial Districts as ”Learning Regions“: a Condition for Prosperity”. In European Planning Studies, Vol. 4, 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation. Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. 1996. “Spatial Outcomes of Capital Restructuring: ‘New Industrial Spaces’ as a Symptom of Crisis, not Solution”, Review of Political Economy, Vol. 8, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L. and D. Romer 1991. “Sticky Prices as Coordination Failure”, American Economic Review, 81/3: 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, C. 1995. International Trade, Multinational Enterprise,and Industrial Policy Choice. In B. Unger and F. van Waarden eds. 80–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benko, G. and M. Dunford eds. 1991. Industrial Change and Regional Development: the Transformation of New Industrial Spaces, London/ New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, G. 1998. “Requiem for the Third Italy? Rise and Fall of a too Successful Concept”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,Vol. 10, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C. 1993. Rationality and Coordination, Cambridge (Mass.): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and L. Lomasky 1982. Institutional Aspects of “Merit Goods” Analysis: Finanzarchiv, N.F. 41, 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, V.M. 1998. “American-Style Capitalism and Income Disparity: The Challenge of Social Anarchy”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXII, 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, P.D. 1987. “The Theory of Institutional Change”, Journal of Economic Issues, XXI: 1075–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, P.D. 1994. Art. Theory of Social Change. In G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool eds. 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.L., J.R. Hollingsworth and L.N. Lindberg, eds. 1991. Governance of the American Economy, Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champlin, D. and P. Olson 1994. “Post-Industrial Metaphors: Understanding Corporate Restructuring and the Economic Environment of the 1990s”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXVIII, 449–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattoe, E. 1998. “Just How (Un)realistic are Evolutionary Algorithms as Representations of Social Processes?”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P.G. and I.R. Gordon 1998. “Territorial Competition: Some Lessons for Policy”, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 32, 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, M.A. 1996. “Markets as a System of Social Contracts”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 23, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., F. Wilson 1991. Power,Technology and Flexibility in Organisations. In J. Law ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J.R. 1934. Institutional Economics, 2 Vols., New York: Macmillan, repr. New Brunswick (NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J.R. 1990: Transaction Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., A. Richards, P.P. Saviotti and V. Walsh eds. 1996. Technological Collaboration. The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield (VT), US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. and A. John 1988. “Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103: 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. 1989. “The Economics of Ignorance or Ignorance of Economics”, Critical Review, Vol. 3, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, H. 1998. On the Stability of Monotone Discrete Selection Dynamics with Inertia, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn, J.A. and E.F. ten Heuvelhof 1995. Policy Networks and Governance. In D.L. Weimer ed. 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S. and J. Michie eds. 1997. Contracts, Cooperation, and Competition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., C. Lane and F. Wilkinson 1997. Contract Law, Trust Relations, and Incentives for Cooperation: A Comparative Study. In Deakin, S., and J. Michie eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delorme, R. and K. Dopfer eds. 1994. The Political Economy of Diversity. Evolutionary Perspectives on Economic Order and Disorder, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dequech, D. 1997. “Uncertainty in a Strong Sense: Meaning and Sources”, Economic Issues, Vol. 2/2, 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, D. and A. Hutton, Alan 1998. “Public Purpose and Private Ownership: Some Implications of the ”Great Capitalist Restoration“ for the Politicization of Private Sector Firms in Britain”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXII, 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. 1987. “Institutionen und ökonomische Institutionentheorie”, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium (WiSt), Vol. 16, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. 1989. “Adam Smith’s Model of the Origins and Emergence of Institutions: The Modern Findings of the Classical Approach”, Journal of Economic Issues,Vol. XXIII, 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. 1998. “Die Zukunft unserer Städte und Regionen: Städte und Regionen im Konkurrenzkampf und die Kehrseiten des Neuen Regionalismus”, WSI-Mitteilungen, Vol. 51, No. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. and J. Huffschmid 1994. Art. Industrial Policy. In: G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool eds. 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. and P. Kirchhoff 1997. “Logistik-Sektor und Region”, IKSF discussion paper No. 13, Bremen: University of Bremen, Dept. of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. and M. Kenney 1990. “Silicon Valley and Route 128 Won’t Save US”, California Management Review, 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrant, R. and E. Flynn 1998. “Seizing Agglomeration’s Potential: The Greater Springfield Massachusetts Metalworking Sector in Transition, 1986–1996” Regional Studies, Vol. 32.3, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, V. 1996. L’Horreur Économique, Paris: Librairie Arth ème Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, R. 1998. “Coevolution and Stable Adjustments in the Cobweb Model”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8/4: 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M. 1995. “Is National Technology Policy Obsolete in a Globalized World? The Japanese Response” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, C. 1996. “Citizen Murdoch — A Case Study in the Paradox of Economic Efficiency”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol.XXX, 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R. and A.F. Robertson eds. 1990. Beyond the Marketplace. Rethinking Economy and Society, New York: A. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and D.K. Levine 1998. The Theory of Learning in Games, Cambridge (Mass.), London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. and K. Mayumi 1998. “Another View of Development, Ecological Degradation, and North-South Trade”, Review of Social Economy, Vol. LVI, 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. 1993. “The Weakness of Strong Ties. The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area.” In: The Embedded Firm. On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, id. ed. London/New York: Routledge, 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. and D. Stark 1997. “Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism”, Regional Studies, Vol. 31, 5, 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen, J. 1997. “Institutions of Capitalisms: American, European, and Japanese Systems Compared”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXI, 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gschwendtner, H. 1993. “A Reconsideration of the Perfect-Competition Model”. In Jahrb ücher far Nationalökonomie and Statistik, Vol. 212, 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.D. ed. 1997. The Political Economy of Globalization,Boston/ Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. and A. Lundgren 1997. Paths in Time and Space —Path Dependence in Industrial Networks. In L. Magnusson and J. Ottosson, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancké, B. 1997. “Modernisation Without Flexible Specialisation. How Large Firm Restructuring and Government Regional Policies became the Step-parents of Autarchic Regional Production Systems in France”, Berlin: Science Center Berlin for Social Research, discussion paper FS I 97–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N., K.J. Button, and P. Nijkamp eds. 1996. Regional Policy and Regional Integration, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.H. 1998. “Regional Adjustment to Trade Liberalization”. In Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 28, 419–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B., M.R. Kelley and J. Gant 1996. “Innovative Firm Behaviour and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, and Technological Change”. In Economic Geography, Vol. 72, 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M., W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool eds. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics,Aldershot, UK, Brookfield (VT), US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, L. and S.E. Page 1998. Diversity and Optimality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, R. 1997. Competitiveness and the Global Region. The Role of Networking. In J.M. Simmie ed. 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intriligator, M.D. 1996. “Reform of the Russian Economy: the Role of Institutions”. In International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 23, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Butler, C., A. Shachar and J. van Weesep eds. 1997. “European Cities in Competition”, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, US, et al.: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 1994. Changing Forms and Functions of the State in an Era of Globalization and Regionalization. In R. Delorme and K. Dopfer, eds. 102–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 1997. The Governance of Complexity and the Complexity of Governance: Preliminary Remarks on Some Problems and Limits of Economic Guidance. In A. Amin and J. Hausner eds. 95–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyman, E.F. 1997. Globalization, State,Identity/Difference. Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Relations, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. 1997. After Technopoles. Diffused Strategies for Innovation and Technology Transfer. In J. Simmie ed., 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, R. 1997. Everything for Sale. The Virtues and Limits of Markets, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagendijk, A. 1998. “Will New Regionalism Survive? Tracing Dominant Concepts in Economic Geography”, draft paper, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. 1995. Industry and Society in Europe. Stability and Change in Britain, Germany and France, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. and R. Bachmann 1997. “Cooperation in Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Germany: the Role of Social Institutions” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 48, 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larédo, P. and P. Mustar 1996. “The Technoeconomic Network: A Socioeconomic Approach to State Intervention in Innovation”. In R. Coombs, R. et al., eds. 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasuén, J.R. 1996. “Urbanisation and Development — the Temporal Interaction between Geographical and Sectoral Clusters”. In N. Hansen, et al. eds. 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. ed. 1991. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. 1985. “Uncertainty and Economic Analysis”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 95, 909–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T.1994. Art. Uncertainty. In G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesourne, J. 1991. “From Market Dynamics to Evolutionary Economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics,Vol. 1, 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, P.M. 1996. “A New-Institutionalist Story about the Transformation of Former Socialist Economies: A Recounting and an Assessment”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXX, 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebrand, W.B.G. and D.M. Messick eds. 1996. “Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research”, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L.N., J.L. Campbell and J.R. Hollingsworth 1991. “Economic Governance and the Analysis of Structural Change in the American Economy”. In J.L. Campbell et al., eds. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, K. 1997. “Evolutionary Dynamics in Game-Theoretic Models”. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, W.B. Arthur, S.N. Durlauf and D.A. Lane, eds. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley, 337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindlar, L. and H. Trabold 1998. “Globalisation, Unemployment and Social Inequality: A Farewell to Welfare?”, Konjunkturpolitik, Vol. 44, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering, J. 1998. “Theory Led by Policy? The Inadequacies of The New Regionalism in Economic Geography Illustrated From the Case of Wales”, paper presented at the Economic Geography Research Group Seminar, London, July 3, to appear in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, M.A. 1996. “Doubts About Competition”. In Social Economics: Promises, Findings, and Policies, E.J. O’Boyle ed., London: Routledge, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, B. and J. Mehta 1997. Private Sector Business Contracts: The Text between the Lines,S. Deakin and J. Michie eds., 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M.A. 1997. “Firms, Uncertainty and Innovation Policy. Some Spatial Considerations in an Evolutionary Framework”. In Economics of Structural and Technological Change, G. Antonelli and N. De Liso ed., London/New York: Routledge, 230–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. and J. Ottosson eds. 1997. Evolutionary Economics and Path Dependence, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. 1996a. “Interaction between Regional and Industrial Policies: Evidence from Four Countries”, International Regional Science Review, Vol. 19, 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. 1996b. “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts”, Economic Geography, Vol. 72, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. 1996c. “Response to William Alonso”, International Regional Science Review, Vol. 19, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R., E.R. Morey and N.D. Olewiler 1995. “Competition in Regional Environmental Policies when Plant Locations are Endogenous”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 56, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. and P. Sunley 1996. “Paul Krugman’s Geographical Economics and Its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment”, Economic Geography, Vol. 72, 259–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1997. “A Veblenian Approach to the Evolving International Economic (Dis)Order”, paper presented to the annual meeting of the Association for Evolutionary Economics, New Orleans 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, G.C. 1962. The Corporate Revolution in America, New York: Crowell-Collier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H.P. 1996. “Uncertainty and the Institutionalist Structure of Capitalist Economies”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXX, 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, K. 1998. “Sticky Prices as a Coordination Success”, Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 26, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munkirs, J.R. 1985. The Transformation of American Capitalism. From Competitive Market Structures to Centralized Private Sector Planning, Armonk et al.: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. 1987. “Art. Merit Goods”, The New Palgrave, London, Basingstoke, 452–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, D. 1997. “Globalisation: The Game, the Players and the Rules”. In Gupta, D. Satya ed. 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, W.C. 1994. Art. Institutions. In G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels, and M.R. Tool eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge (Mass.), London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. and O.K. Pedersen 1988. “The Ngotiated Eonomy: Ideal and History”, Scandinavian Political Studies, 2, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., R. Costanca and R.C. Bishop 1998. “The Evolution Of Preferences. Why ”Sovereign“ Preferences May Not Lead To Sustainable Policies And What To Do About It”, Ecological Economics, 24: 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. and R.M. Schwab 1988. “Economic Competition Among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing?”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 35, 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD 1991. “Techno-Economic Networks and Science and Technology Policy”, Science, Technology, Industry Review, No. 14, Paris: OECD, 59–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, T. and J. Sonnemans 1998. “Learning by Experience and Learning by Imitating Successful Others”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34: 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottati, G.D. 1994. “Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in the Industrial District”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G.P. and D. Puga 1997. “Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the New Economic Geography”, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper No. 356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petr, J.L. 1996. “Discontinuities in Economic Evolution: Lessons from the Eastern Front”, paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Evolutionary Economics, San Francisco, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. and L. Smith-Doerr 1994, “Networks and Economic Life”, The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton, New York, 368–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasch, R.E. 1992. “Economics and Merger Mania: A Critique of Efficient Markets Theory”, Journal of Economic Issues,Vol. XXVI, 635–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. 1997. The Emerging Shape and Form of Innovation Networks and Institutions. In J. Simmie ed., 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F. and W. Sengenberger eds. 1992. Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramstad, Y. 1991. “From Desideratum to Historical Achievement: John R. Commons’s Reasonable Value and the ”Negotiated Economy“ of Denmark”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXV, 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegemer, W. 1985. Neue Technik —Alte Gesellschaft. Silicon Valley, Cologne (Germany): Pahl-Rugenstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W. and R. van Tulder 1995. The Logic of International Restructuring, London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, Ch.F. 1992. Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy. In F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger eds. 215–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M.C. 1993. “The Nature and Role of the Market”. In Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies, C. Pitelis ed. Oxford, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M.C. 1995. “Industry: Performance and Policies”. In: D. Coates, ed., Economic and Industrial Performance in Europe, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schohl, F. 1992. Renditeunterschiede und Schumpetersche Entwicklung, Berlin: Duncker&Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S. 1958. Time in Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Simmie, J.M. ed. 1997. Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions?, London, Bristol (PA): Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. 1997. “The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition”, Journal of Public Economics,Vol. 66, 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbert, A. 1996. “Capitalism at the Crossroads” International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 23, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. and B. Harrison 1991. “Flexibility, Hierarchy and Regional Development: The Changing Structure of Industrial Production SysTems and Their Forms of Governance in the 1980s”, Research Policy, Vol. 20, 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. 1996. “Multinational Economies and the Law of Uneven Development”, Occasional Papers in Industrial Strategy, No. 37, Research Center for Industrial Strategy, The University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlicic, M. and H.W. Singer 1996. World Economy: Challenges of Globalisation and Regionalisation“. In M. Svetlicic and H.W. Singer eds. 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlicic, M. and H.W. Singer eds. 199. The World Economy. Challenges of Globalization and Regionalization, Houndmills, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, G. 1995. “National Innovation Policy or a Regional Innovation Culture”, EUNIP Working Papers in European Industrial Policy, No. 1, Birmingham: The University of Birmingham, Research Centre for Industrial Strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tool, M.R. 1994. John Art. Dewey. In G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool eds. 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toruno, M.C. 1997. “Blind Drift and the Rightist State”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXI, 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigilia, C. 1992. “Italian Industrial Districts: Neither Myth nor Interlude”. In F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger eds. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, B. 1997. “Limits of Convergence and Globalisation” In Gupta, D. Satya ed. 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, B. and F. van Waarden eds. 1995. “Convergence or Diversity?” Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, US: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Th.B. 1919. The Vested Interests and the Common Man, repr. New York: Capricorn, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ver Eecke, W. 1998. “The Concept of a ”Merit Good“. The Ethical Dimension in Economic Theory and the History of Economic Thought or the Transformation of Economics Into Socio-Economics”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 27: 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, M. 1985. “Lessons for Competition Policy from Industrial Economic Theory”. In Fiscal Studies, Vol. 6, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, D.L. 1995. “Institutional Design: Overview”. In id ed., 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, D.L. (ed.) 1995. Institutional Design, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, Ch.K. 1998. “Globalization and Democracy”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXII, 465–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.D. 1996. “Capital Mobility and Environmental Standards: Is there a Theoretical Basis for a Race to the Bottom?” In J. Bhagwati, R.E. Hudec, eds. Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade?, Cambridge (MA), 393–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Wolfram Elsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bremen, Germany

    Wolfram Elsner

  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    John Groenewegen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elsner, W. (2000). An Industrial Policy Agenda 2000 and Beyond — Experience, Theory and Policy. In: Elsner, W., Groenewegen, J. (eds) Industrial Policies After 2000. Recent Economic Thought, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3996-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3996-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5766-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3996-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation