Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 9))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

It is a commonplace in geologists’ historical accounts that scientists in the southern hemisphere were much earlier in their acceptance of the idea of continental drift than their northern hemisphere counterparts. The explanation offered is captured in a pencilled scrawl by an anonymous wit on the flyleaf of a 1972 collection of papers by Australian earth scientists found in the library of the United States Geological Survey: ‘Most of Earth’s bigger scars, sutures and dimples etc. were more visible on her bottom, and the people down under were quicker to see them’.

I gratefully acknowledge comments on an earlier draft received from D.F. Branagan, S.W. Carey, R.W. Home, J. Sapp and T.G. Valiance. I appreciate the cooperation of those many individuals cited in the notes who shared with me their recollections and papers and of W. Glen who permitted use of some interview materials. This research was supported by ARC grant А58716008 and the Research Fund of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Melbourne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H.E. Le Grand, ‘Specialties, Problems and Localism: The Reception of Continental Drift in Australia, 1920–1940’, Earth Sciences History, 5(1986), 84–95; H.E. Le Grand, Drifting Continents and Shifting Theories (Cambridge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Le Grand, op. cit. (n. 1: 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.; H.E. Le Grand ‘Paleomagnetism and Continental Drift: Historical Introduction’, in Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, ed. D.E. James (New York: 1989), 901–909; pp. 906–907.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Le Grand, op. cit. (п. 1: 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Frankel, ‘Biogeography, before and after the Rise of Sea Floor Spreading’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 15 (1984), 141–68; Le Grand, op. cit. (n. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frankel, op. cit. (n. 5); Le Grand, op. cit. (n. 1: 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frankel, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.S. Hills, personal communication (hereafter, p.c.).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.L. Hales, ‘Keith Edward Bullen, 1906–1976’, Historical Records of Australian Science, 4(2) (1979), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T.W.E. David, The Geology of the Commonwealth of Australia; edited and much supplemented by W.R. Browne, vol. 1 (London, 1950), pp. 688–89. T.G. Valiance suggests (p.c.) that the “woolliness” of Drift theory in Brown’s day was alien to his systematic, logical style and may have contributed to his distaste for that theory; see also Valiance, ‘William Rowan Browne, 1884–1975’, Historical Records of Australian Science, 4(1) (1978), 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.W. Carey, Theories of the Earth and Universe: A History of Dogma in the Earth Sciences (Stanford: 1988), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.W. Carey, The Expanding Earth (New York: 1976), pp. 2–3; Carey, p.c.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carey, p.c.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Elliston, p.c.; Ian McDougall, interview by H. Le Grand, 25 March 1988, tI sl.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Elliston, p.c. Elliston was one of Carey’s first students, completing his honours degree in 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elliston, p.c.; Carey, interview by H. Le Grand, 29–31 August, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Öpik to M.F. Glaessner (editor of Journal of the Geological Society of Australia), 1 November 1954; Öpik papers, Australian Science Archives Project (University of Melbourne). The probability that Carey’s advocacy of Drift rather than personal factors resulted in this rejection is strengthened by the fact that the same panel of referees (Alderman, Browne, Hills) had previously approved for publication another paper by Carey [‘The Rheid Concept in Geotectonics’, JGSA, 1 (1954), 67–117]. That earlier paper, though synthetic and theoretical and invoking convection currents in the mantle, had not explicitly mentioned Drift.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carey, p.c.; McDougall, 25 March 1988, t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.W. Carey, ‘The Orocline Concept in Geotectonics’, Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 89(1955), 255–288. Offprints from this small-circulation journal were circulated among overseas geologists and geophysicists with an interest in Drift.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Öpik papers, op. cit. (n. 19).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.W. Carey, ed., Continental Drift: A Symposium (Hobart: 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oliphant, P.C.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.T. Wilson, ‘Notes on the Study of Geophysics by Professor J. Tuzzo [sic] Wilson. University of Toronto - November 1950’; ANU Archives, Administrative Records (Registrar’s Division), document 655/1956, P. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.S. Paterson, ‘John Conrad Jaeger, 1907–1979’, Historical Records of Australian Science, 5(3) (1982), 65–88; pp. 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson, op. cit. (n. 29), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.C. Jaeger, Letter dated 25 January 1955 to the Vice-Chancellor, ANU; ANU Archives, file 8.7.1.1 (Department of Geophysics Policy).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oliphant, p.c.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Irving, loc. cit. (n. 35).

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Irving, interview by H.E. Le Grand, 12 February 1988, t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Irving, ‘The Palaeomagnetism of the Torridonian Sandstone Series of North-Western Scotland’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Le Grand, op. cit.(n. 1: 1988), pp. 138–169, for a discussion of the development of palaeomagnetic studies and their relation to Drift.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Irving, op. cit. (n. 38), tI sl.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See J.C. Jaeger and G. Joplin, ‘Rock Magnetism and the Differentiation of Dolerite Sill’, Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 2(1955), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Irving, op. cit. (п. 35), t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Irving, interview by W. Glen, 7 February 1978, t2 sl; also, Irving, op. cit. (n. 35), tI sl and (n. 38), tl s2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J.C. Jaeger papers, Gasser Library, Australian Academy of Science, MS 120/1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Irving, ‘The Magnetization of the Mesozoic Dolerites of Tasmania’, Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 90(1956), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Irving, op. cit. (n. 35), t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. Irving, ‘Palaeomagnetic and Palaeoclimatological Aspects of Polar Wandering’, Geofisica pura a applicata, 33 (1956), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., pp. 35–7. Irving (ibid., p. 40) credits Jaeger with suggesting this. However, the argument is clearly set out in Irving’s thesis (op. cit. [п. 40], p. 110) and he now regards the published note as mistaken (Irving, p.c.).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Irving, op. cit. (n. 50), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. Irving, ‘Rock Magnetism: A New Approach to the Problems of Polar Wandering and Continental Drift’, in Carey, op. cit. (n. 25), pp. 24–61; p. 5; also, Carey, ibid., p. 357 and Irving, op. cit. (n. 38), t2 si.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Cox and R.R. Doell, ‘Review of Paleomagnetism’, Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 71 (1960), 645–768; p. 762.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Irving, W.A. Robertson and P.M. Stott, ‘The Paleomagnetism of some Mesozoic Rocks from Eastern Australia: Preliminary Remarks’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 68 (1963), 2281–2; p. 2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. E. Irving, W.A. Robertson and P.M. Stott, ‘The Significance of the Paleomagnetic Results from Mesozoic Rocks of Eastern Australia’, Journal of Geophysical Research,68 (1963), 2313–7; p. 2313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Irving, op. cit. (п. 38), t2 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J. Verhoogen, ‘North American Paleomagnetism and Geology’, in Geological Society of America Centennial Special Volume, ed. E.T. Drake and W.M. Jordan (Boulder, 1985), 401–7; p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L.E.F. Néel, ‘Some Theoretical Aspects of Rock Magnetism’, Advances in Physics, 4 (1955), 191–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. F.D. Stacey, interview by H.E. Le Grand, 19 May 1988, t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Graham, A.F. Buddington and J.R. Balsley, ‘Stress-induced Magnetizations of Some Rocks with Analyzed Magnetic Minerals’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 62(1957), 465–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Stacey, op. cit. (п. 60), t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  54. F.D. Stacey, ‘Effect of Stress on the Remanent Magnetism of Magnetite-bearing rocks’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 63 (1958), 361–8; Stacey, ‘Magnetic Anisotropy of Igneous Rocks’, 65 (1960), 2429–42; P.M. Stott and F.D. Stacey, ‘Magnetostriction and Palaeomagnetism of Igneous Rocks’, Nature, 183 (1959), 384–5; Stott and Stacey, ‘Magnetostriction and Palaeomagnetism of Igneous Rocks’, Journal of Geophysical Research, 65 (1960), 2419–24.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cox and Doell, op. cit. (n. 54), p. 655. Stacey (op. cit. [n. 60], t1 sl) recounts that soon after the appearance of the 1960 papers in the Journal of Geophysical Research Buddington wrote to him acknowledging the case that Stacey had made and withdrawing the magnetostriction argument.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., pp. 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., pp. 81–4 and 210.

    Google Scholar 

  58. J.F. Evemden, interview by H.E. Le Grand, 8 February 1988, t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.F. Evernden and J.R. Richards, ‘Potassium-Argon Ages in Eastern Australia’, Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 9(1) (1962), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Evemden and Richards, op. cit. (n. 71), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  62. McDougall, op. cit. (n. 21), tl s2; for Hess, see Le Grand, op. cit. (n. 1: 1988), pp. 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  63. McDougall, ibid., t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  66. I. McDougall and D.H. Yarling, ‘Dating of Polarity Zones in the Hawaiian Islands’, Nature, 200(1963), 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. A. Cox, interview by W. Glen, 2 May 1978, t4 sl and t4 s2.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Stacey, op. cit. (п. 60), t1 sl.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See Le Grand, op. cit. (n. 1: 1988), pp. 193–5 and 252–3.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stacey, op. cit. (n. 60), tI s2.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Irving, op. cit. (n. 38), t1 s2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Le Grand, H.E. (1991). Theories of the Earth as Seen from Below. In: Home, R.W., Hohlstedt, S.G. (eds) International Science and National Scientific Identity. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3786-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3786-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5686-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3786-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics