Abstract
The important contribution that scientists make to agenda setting has not been sufficiently recognized in scholarly literature. The students of agenda setting have only recently come to realize the importance of ideas that come from sources outside the government. There has been little research that identifies the scientific community as a source of agenda topics. While there is a large literature devoted to the relationship between science and government, it has generally been concluded that there is no scientific elite with an undue influence upon government. Instead, the principal concern has been the perversion of science by politics. The activity of subgroups of scientists acting as entrepreneurs to set the public agenda on topics in which they have a strong interest has not been widely acknowledged.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington: National Science Foundation.
Callendar, G.S. 1938. “The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and its Influence on Temperature.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meterological Society 64: 223.
Cobb, R.W., and C.W. Elder. 1972. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cobb, R.W., and C.W. Elder. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cobb, R.W., J. Keith-Ross, and M.H. Ross. 1976. “Agenda-Building as a Comparative Political Process.” American Political Science Review 70: (1): 126–138.
Cook, F.L., and W.G. Skogan. 1989. “Agenda-Setting: Convergent and Divergent Voice Models of the Rise and Fall of Policy Issues.” Northwestern University, Unpublished Paper.
Downs, A. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle.” The Public Interest 28: 38–50.
Fleming, D. 1972. “Roots of the New Conservation Movement”. Vol. 6 of Perspectives in American History. D. Fleming and B. Bailyn, eds. Cambridge: Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History.
Freeman, J.L. 1955. The Political Process. New York: Random House.
Gilpin, R.,and C. Wright, eds. 1964. Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ingram, H., H. Cortner, and M. Landy. 1990. “The Political Agenda.” In Paul E. Waggoner, eds., Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Ingram, H., and C. Mintzer. 1990. How Atmospheric Research Changed the Political Climate. Tucson, AZ. Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy Issue Paper No. 1.
Keeling, C.D. 1987. Measurements of the Concentration of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, 1958-1986. Final Report for the Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Center. Oak Ridge, TN: Martin-Marietta Energy Systems Inc.
Kingdon, J.W. 1984. Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.
Laumann, E.O., and David Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Lotka, A.J. ‘1925’ 1956. Elements of Physical Biology. ‘Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins.’ Reprint. New York: Dover.
Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters: The Army Engineers and the Nation’ s Rivers. Cambridge: Harvard.
McKibben, B. 1989. “The End of Nature,” The New Yorker, p. 58. A review of the National Newspaper Index bears out the fact that 1988 articles focus on the Hansen testimony, OMB’ s altering of it and the debate.
Michaels, O. 1989. The Greenhouse Climate of Fear. The Washington Post. January 8.
Molina, M.J., and F.S. Rowland. 1974. “Stratospheric Sink for Chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine Atom Catalyzed Destruction of Ozone.” Nature 249: 810–812.
Mukerji, C. 1989. A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelkin, D. 1987. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: Freeman and Company.
Nelson, B.J. 1984. Making an Issue of Child Abuse: Political Agenda Setting for Social Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peters, G.B., and B.W. Hogwood. 1985. “In Search of the Issue Attention Cycle.” The Journal of Politics 47: 238–253.
Price, D.K. 1964. “The Scientific Establishment.” In Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Price, D.K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ramanathan, V., R.J. Cicerone, H.B. Singh, and J.T. Kiehl. 1985. “Trace Gas Trends and Their Potential Role in Climate Change.” Journal of Geophysical Research 90: 5547–5566.
Raynaud, R., and J. Barnola. 1985. “An Antarctic Ice Core Reveals Atmospheric CO2 Variations Over the Past Few Centuries.” Nature 315: 309–311.
Redford, E.S. 1960. “A Case Analysis of Congressional Activity: Civil Aviation: 1957-58. Journal of Politics 22(2): 228–258.
Revelle, R., and H.E. Suess. 1957. “Carbon Dioxide Exchange Between Atmosphere and Ocean and the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 During the Past Decades.” Tellus 9: 18.
Rogers, P., and M. Fiering. 1989. “Climate Change: Do We Know Enough to Act?” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, (Winter): 15–13.
Rosenbaum, W. 1985. Environmental Politics and Policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Schneider, S. 1989. Global Warming: Are We Entering the Greenhouse Century? San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
Schon, D.A. 1971. Beyond the Stable State. New York: Norton.
Thompson, H. 1985. “Why Scientists are Speaking Out.” New Scientist (21 Nov): 28–29.
U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearing on Greenhouse Effect and Global Climate Change. 100th Cong., 2nd sess. June 23, 1988. S. Hearing 100–461, pt 2.
Van de Ven, A.H. 1986. “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation.” Management Science 32(5): 590–607.
Walker, J.L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7(4): 423–445.
Walker, J.L. 1981. “The Diffusion of Knowledge, Policy Communities and Agenda Setting: The Relationship Between Knowledge and Power.” In John L. Tropman, et. al., eds., New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy. London: Pergamon.
Weingart, P. 1982. “The Scientific Power Elite-a Chimera: the Deinstitutionalization and Politicization of Science.” In N. Elias, H. Martin, and R. Whitley, eds., Scientific Establishment and Hierarchies. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Wood, R. 1964. “Scientists and Politics: The Rise of an Apolitical Elite.” In R. Gilpin and C. Wright, eds., Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingram, H., Brinton Milward, H., Laird, W. (1992). Scientists and Agenda Setting: Advocacy and Global Warming. In: Waterstone, M. (eds) Risk and Society: The Interaction of Science, Technology and Public Policy. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3634-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3634-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5613-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3634-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive