Advertisement

Strategies to Increase the Efficiency of Membrane Aerated and Perfused Animal Cell Bioreactors by an Improved Medium Perfusion

  • H. D. Blasey
  • V. Jäger

Abstract

A bioreactor system based on internal membrane aeration and perfusion was used to cultivate a variety of mammalian and insect cell lines for the production of recombinant proteins, monoclonal antibodies or biomass. The efficiency of this reactor system is evaluated with respect to maximum cell concentration, productivity and membrane lifetime in order to give some fundamental data for comparison with other stirred tank perfusion bioreactors. Due to the membrane capacities for aeration and perfusion, eight to thirty fold increases in cell concentration compared to batch cultivation in culture flasks could be obtained routinely with unchanged cell viabilities.

For further increase of the efficiency of the perfusion system several strategies have been developed. Different membrane materials and pore sizes have been investigated and the membrane lifetime has been prolonged by backflushing and membrane precoating.

Keywords

Perfusion System Hollow Fiber Membrane Oxygen Transfer Rate Bioreactor System Membrane Fouling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blasey H.D. and Winzer U. (1989) ‘Low protein serum-free medium for antibody production in stirred bioreactors’, Biotechnol. Lett 11, 455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eibl, H. and Lands, W.E.M. (1969) ‘A new sensitive determination of phosphate’ Anal. Biochem. 30, 51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fane, A.G.; Fell, C.J.D. and Kim, K.J. (1985) ‘The effect of surfactant pretreatment on the ultrafiltration of proteins’, Desalination 53, 37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hill, B.T. and Whatley, S. (1975) ‘A simple, rapid assay for DNA’ FEBS Lett. 56, 20–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Himmelfarb, P.; Thayer, P.S. and Roberts, D.W. (1969) ‘Spin filter culture: The propagation of mammalian cells in suspension’, Science 164, 555–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim, K.J.; Fane, A.G. and Fell C.J.D. (1988) ‘The performance of ultrafiltration membranes pretreated by polymers’, Desalination 70, 229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lehmann, J.; Piehl, G.W. and Schulz, R. (1987) ‘Bubble free cell culture aeration with porous moving membranes’, Develop. biol. Standard., Vol. 66, S. Karger, Basel, pp. 227–240Google Scholar
  8. Lehmann, J.; Vorlop, J. and Büntemeyer, H. (1988) ‘Bubble-free reactors and their development for continuous culture with cell recycle’, in R.E. Spier and J.B. Griffiths (eds.) ‘Animal Cell Biotechnology Vol. 3’, Acad. Press, London, pp. 221–237Google Scholar
  9. Lucki-Lange, M. and Wagner, R. (1991) ‘Conditions for the production of recombinant IL-2 in stirred suspension culture using a protein-free medium’, in R.E. Spier, J.B. Griffiths, B. Meignier (eds.), ’Production of Biologicals from Animal Cells in Culture. Research, Developments and Achievements’, Butterworths Pub., Kent, in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. Mizrahi, A. (1975) ‘Pluronic polyols in human lymphocyte cell lines cultures’, J. Clin. Microbiol. 2, 11–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rebsamen, E; Goldinger, W.; Scheirer, W.; Merten, O.-W. and Palfi, G.E. (1987) ‘Use of a dynamic filtration method for separation of animal cells’, Develop. biol. Standard. 66, 273–277Google Scholar
  12. Shintani, Y.; Iwamoto, K. and Kitano, K. (1988) ’ Polyethylene glycols for promoting the growth of mammalian cells’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27, 533–537Google Scholar
  13. Takazawa, Y.; Tokashiki, M.; Murakami, H.; Yamada, K and Omura, H. (1988) ‘High-density culture of mouse-human hybridoma in serum-free defined medium’, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 31, 168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tokashiki, M.; Hamamoto, K and Takazawa, Y. (1988) ‘Perfusion culture of hybridoma cells recycling higher-molecularweight components’, Hakkokogaku 66, 31–35Google Scholar
  15. Tolbert, W.R.; Feder, J. and Kimes, R.C. (1981) ‘Large-scale rotating filter perfusion system for high-density growth of mammalian suspension cultures’ In Vitro 17, 885–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Varecka, R. and Scheirer, W. (1987) ‘Use of a rotating wire cage for retention of animal cells in a perfusion fermentor’, Develop. biol. Standard 66, 269–272Google Scholar
  17. Velez, D.; Miller, L. and Macmillan, J.D. (1988) ‘Use of tangential flow filtration in perfusion propagation of hybridoma cells for production of monoclonal antibodies’ Biotechnol Bioeng. 33, 938–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Blasey
    • 1
  • V. Jäger
    • 1
  1. 1.Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Forschung mbHBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations