Abstract
A major goal of discussions on societal steering within the field of Public Administration is to diminish steering pretentions. Unrealistic expectations concerning the possibilities for societal steering dissipate in these discussions. The monocentric perspective on steering is corrected by pointing out that the government is not the only, nor the central steering authority (Van Vught, 1986). Government operates in a policy arena of mutually dependent actors who are trying to realize their own private goals and who each have their own means of influencing other actors (Ringeling and Hufen, 1990). This perspective on steering, defined as the polycentric perspective, helps to explain the disappointing results of steering by government. The possibilities for making recommendations regarding the improvement of steering results based on research conducted from a polycentric perspective are however limited. Often one has to confine oneself to the recommendation to lower expectations concerning steering results. At times, researchers even resort to using the monocentric perspective when formulating recommendations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Twist, M.J.W., Termeer, C.J.A.M. (1991). Introduction to Configuration Approach: A Process Theory for Societal Steering. In: in ’t Veld, R.J., Schaap, L., Termeer, C.J.A.M., van Twist, M.J.W. (eds) Autopoiesis and Configuration Theory: New Approaches to Societal Steering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3522-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3522-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5558-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3522-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive