Abstract
According to standard assumptions of generative theory, operators are subject to the following universal principle of scope interpretation:
-
(1)
An operator c-commands its scope.1
Sentences are checked for principle (1) when they enter the semantic interpretive component of grammar. Principle (1) is either satisfied in syntax already: at D-structure, by base-generation, or S-structure, as a result of Move WH; or is only met at LF, the abstract level of representation directly feeding into semantic interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, W. and de Mey, S. (eds.): 1986, Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Ackerman, F.: 1984, ‘Verbal Modifiers as Argument Taking Predicates: Complex Verbs in Hungarian’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 25, 3–71.
Ackerman, F. and Komlósy, A.: 1983, ‘Néhány lépés a magyar szórend megértése felé’, ms., Linguistic Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
Barker, M.: 1985, ‘Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Farkas, D.: 1986, ‘Focus in Hungarian’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 77–97.
Gabbay, D. and Moravcsik, J.: 1974, ‘Branching Quantifiers, English and Montague Grammar’, Theoretical Linguistics 1.1.
Higginbotham, J. and May, R.: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’, The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.
Horvath, J.: 1981, ‘Aspects of Hungarian Syntax and the Theory of Grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, CA.
Horvath, J.: 1985, Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian, Foris, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Huang, J.: 1982, ‘Logical Relations in Chinese, and the Theory of Grammar’,Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Hunyadi, L.: 1981, ‘A nyelvi polaritás kifejezése a magyarban’, dissertation for the candidate’s degree, Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen.
Hunyadi, L.: 1982, ‘Remarks on the Syntax and Semantics of Topic and Focus in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 107–136.
Kálmán, L. et al.: 1986, aa‘Hocus, Focus, and Verb Types in Hungarian Infinitive Constructions’, in: Abraham and Mey (eds.), 129–142.
Kenesei, I.: 1989, ‘Logikus-e a magyar szórend?’, Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XVII, 105–152.
Kiss, K.: 1986,aa ‘The Order and Scope of Operators in the Hungarian Sentence’, in: Abraham and Mey (eds.), 181–214.
Kiss, K.: 1987a, ‘Configurationality in Hungarian’, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, and Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Kiss, K.: 1987b, ‘Eliminating the Configurationality Parameter’ unpublished, Linguistic Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
Kiss, K.: 1987c, ‘Még egyszer a magyar mondat hangsúlyozásárol es intonációjáról’, Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (to appear).
May, R.: 1977, ‘The Grammar of Quantification’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
May, R.: 1983, Logical Form Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reinhart, T.: 1976, ‘The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Szabolcsi, A.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of Topic-Focus Articulation’, in: J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Matematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.
Szabolcsi, A.: 1983a, ‘Focussing Properties, or the Trap of First Order’, Theoretical Linguistics 10, 2.
Szabolcsi, A.: 1983b, ‘The Possessor that Ran Away from Home’, The Linguistic Review 3, 89–102.
Szabolcsi, A.: 1986, ‘From the Definiteness Effect to Lexical Integrity’, in: W. Abraham and S. de Mey (eds.), 321–348.
Williams, E.: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 277–295.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiss, K.É. (1992). Logical Structure in Syntactic Structure: The Case of Hungarian. In: Huang, CT.J., May, R. (eds) Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1636-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3472-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive