Advertisement

The Meaning of ‘Radical Foundation’ in Husserl: The Outline of an Interpretation

  • Maria José Cantista
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 34)

Abstract

In this work1 I shall attempt to analyze the fertility of Husserl’s thinking, putting into perspective the successive metamorphoses which the notion of foundation, of the return to the very roots of all signification, comprehends. Obviously, this is a possible reading — among many others — and is inspired by a certain inflection of the central meaning of phenomenology within its own history.

Keywords

Transcendental Idealism Inspire Motive Cartesian Meditation Radical Foundation Intentional Consciousness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, Le Philosophe et son ombre (Paris: Gallimard, 1967), pp. 242–243.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    P. Landsberg, “Husserl et l’idée de la philosophie,” Rev. Int. Phil. 1 (1939), p. 321.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. xv.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Merleau-Ponty, Le philosophe et son ombre, (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 244.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    M.-J. Cantista, “A filosofia: que trabalho?”, Cadernos de Filosofia 1 (1989), pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    E. Husserl, Meditaciones Cartesianas (Mexico City: F.C.E., 1942), p. 68.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    E. Husserl, Meditaciones Cartesianas (Mexico City: F.C.E., 1942), p. 152.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, “L’oeil et l’esprit,” in Les Temps Modernes 184–185 (1961), p. 193.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, “L’oeil et l’esprit,” in Les Temps Modernes 184–185 (1961), p. 195.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, “L’oeil et l’esprit,” in Les Temps Modernes 184–185 (1961), 193Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. iv.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. viii.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. viii.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, La Structure du comportement (Paris: P.U.F., 1967), pp. 122ff.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. ix.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. ix.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. x.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. x.Google Scholar
  19. 20a.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 77.Google Scholar
  20. 20b.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 419.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 76.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 419, n.1.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    On the influence of Husserl’s last study on the thinking of Merleau-Ponty, cf. M. J. Cantista, Sentido y Ser en Merleau-Ponty (Pamplona: EUNSA, 1982), pp. 79–97. The “pioneering” readings of Husserl by Merleau-Ponty should be stressed, particularly those of: Erfahrung und Urteil, Ideen II and III, Krisis, Möglichkeit einer Ontologie der Lebenswelt, Möglichkeit einer Ontologie des Menschen, Ursprung der Geometrie, and Umsturz der Kopernikanischer Lehre.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Merleau-Ponty, Le philosophe et son ombre, (Paris: Gallimard, 1945), p. 284.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Fink, “L’Analyse intentioneile et le problème de la pensée spéculative,” in Problèmes actuelles de la phénoménologie (Desclée, 1952), p. 71.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merleau-Ponty, Le philosophe et son ombre, (Desclée, 1952), p. 265.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Fink, “Das Problem der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1 (1939), p. 265.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. Fink, “Das Problem der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1 (1939), pp. 266f.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Fink, “Das Problem der Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1 (1939), p. 269.Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    Marc Richir, “La défenestration,” L’arc 46 (1971), pp. 31ff.Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, Le visible et l’invisible (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), p. 61.Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Résumés de cours (Paris: 1988), p. 165.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, Le visible et l’invisible (Paris: 1988), pp. 233f.Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, Signes (Paris: Gallimard, 1960), p. 49.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    Cf. M. Merleau-Ponty, Signes (Paris: Gallimard, 1960), p. 53.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Cf. G. Vattimo, O fim da modernidade (Lisbon: Presença, 1987).Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    A. Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (Portuguese trans.: A cultura inculta [Publ. Europa-América, Mem Martins, 1989]). In the very introduction, and on the mentality of the American university student, he asserts critically that relativism is necessary to openness and that is the virtue, the only virtue, which all primary education for the last fifty years has been dedicated to instilling. Bloom also notes that openness, and relativism makes it the only plausible position vis-a-vis the various claims to truth and the various ways of living and the various sorts of human beings — is the great knowledge of our time. The true believer is the one who represents the real danger. Cf. p. 25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria José Cantista
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OportoPortugal

Personalised recommendations