Skip to main content

Fuzzy Components in Community Level Comparisons

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Handbook of vegetation science ((HAVS,volume 11))

Abstract

The conventions of traditional plant community analysis assume an arrangement of the community components in discrete populations. While this assumption is in line with the notion of absolute discreteness in classical taxonomy in the sense that no organism may belong to more than one taxon, it is not on all fours with reality. The assumption of overlapping populations is indeed more realistic by virtue of the fact that organisms will show affinities to other organisms not in their taxa and not in their community. Starting from this fundamental fact, and observing that by practicing the assumption of absolute discreteness leads to an over-abundance of zeros (absences) in the data and through this to increased levels of indeterminacy in community comparisons, it makes sense to us to pass from an absolutely discrete taxonomy to one which has provisions for similarity-based population overlap. In one case, the field records use discrete taxa which are replaced in the analysis by their fuzzy set equivalents; the latter which emphasize a posteriori taxon similarities. Fuzzy sets of this kind form the basis of a new similarity measure which we propose for community level comparisons. We describe this measure and illustrate it by example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barkman, J.J. 1988. New systems of plant growth forms and phenological plant types. In: M.J.A. Werger, P.J.M. van der Aart, H.J. During and J.T.A. Verhoeven (eds.) Plant Form and Vegetation Structure; Adaptation, Plasticity and Relation to Herbivory. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M. 1988. Some fuzzy approaches to phytosociology: ideals and instances. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 23: 239–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, P. 1957. Biogeography; An Ecological Perspective. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. and V. Zuccarello. 1986. Ordination based on classification: yet another solution? Abstracta Botanica 10: 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. and V. Zuccarello. 1988. Syntaxonomy: a source of useful fuzzy sets for environmental analysis? Coenoses 3: 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsili-Libelli, S. 1989. Fuzzy clustering of ecological data. Coenoses 4: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1988. Detecting vegetation patterns. ISI Atlas of Science 1: 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1991 On character-based plant community analysis: choice, arrangement, comparison, (see Chapter 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., E. Feoli, D. Lausi and P. Nimis. 1986. Estimation of character structure convergence (divergence) in plant communities; a nested hierarchical model. Coenoses 1: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. and M. Orlóci. 1985. Comparison of communities without the use of species: model and example. Annali di Botanica 43: 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. and V. De Patta Pillar. 1989. On sample size optimality in ecosystem survey. Biometrie-Praximetrie 29: 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. and S.L. Stofella. 1986. The taxon-free approach to the study of plant communities. Annals of Arid Zone 25; 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D.W. 1986. Ordination on the basis of fuzzy set theory. Vegetatio 66: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildi, O. and L. Orlóci. 1990. Numerical Exploration of Community Patterns. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve, F. 1942. The desert vegetation of North America. Botanical Review 8: 195–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Feoli L. Orlóci

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Patta Pillar, V., Orlóci, L. (1991). Fuzzy Components in Community Level Comparisons. In: Feoli, E., Orlóci, L. (eds) Computer assisted vegetation analysis. Handbook of vegetation science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3418-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3418-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5512-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3418-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics