Advertisement

End Products of Cometary Evolution: Cometary Origin of Earth-Crossing Bodies of Asteroidal Appearance

  • G. W. Wetherill
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 167)

Abstract

Because there is no necessary connection between the time required to remove the volatile component of a cometary nucleus by solar heating (physical lifetime) and the dynamical lifetime of a comet, it is possible that a comet may evolve into an observable object of asteroidal appearance. Almost all comets have dynamical lifetimes much shorter than their physical lifetimes and in these cases complete loss of volatiles will not occur. Mechanisms do exist, however, whereby a small but significant fraction of comets will have longer dynamical lifetimes, permitting them to evolve first into Jupiter-family short period comets and then into comets with relatively safe decoupled orbits interior to Jupiter’s orbit. Observed Jupiter-family objects of asteroidal appearance (e.g., 1983SA) are much more likely to be of cometary rather than asteroidal origin. “Decoupling” is facilitated by several mechanisms: perturbations by the terrestrial planets, perturbations by Jupiter and the other giant planets (including resonant perturbations) and non-gravitational orbital changes caused by the loss of gas and dust from the comet. The dynamical time scale for decoupling is probably 105–106 years and almost all decoupled comets are likely to be of asteroidal appearance. Once decoupled, the orbits of the resulting Apollo-Amor objects will evolve on a longer (107–108 year) time scale, and the orbital evidence for these objects having originally been comets rather than asteroids will nearly disappear. Statistically, however, a large fraction of the bodies in deep Earth-crossing orbits with semi-major axes ≳ 2.2 AU are likely to be cometary objects in orbits that have not yet diffused into the steady state distribution. For plausible values of the relevant parameters, estimates can be made of the number of cometary Apollo-Amor “asteroids,” the observed number of Earth-crossing active and inactive short period comets, and the production rate of short period comets. These estimates are compatible with other theoretical and observational inferences that suggest the presence of a significant population of Apollo objects that formerly were active comets.

Keywords

Monte Carlo Calculation Terrestrial Planet Cometary Nucleus Orbital Evolution Secular Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J. R. (1965) The origin of meteorites as small bodies. II. The model, III. General considerations, Astrophys. J. 141, 1536–1556.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campins, H., A’Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., and Millis, R. L. (1988) The nucleus of comet P/Tempel 2, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 20 (abstract).Google Scholar
  3. Duncan, M., Quinn, T., and Tremaine, S. (1987) The formation and extent of the solar system comet cloud, Astrophys. J. 94, 1330–1338.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Duncan, M., Quinn, T., and Tremaine, S. D. (1988) The origin of short period comets, Astrophys. J. 328, L69–L73.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Everhart, E. (1972) The origin of short period comets, Astrophys. Lett. 10, 131–135.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Everhart, E. (1977) The evolution of comet orbits as perturbed by Uranus and Neptune, in A. H. Delsemme (ed.), Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites University of Toledo, Toledo, pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
  7. Fernández, J. A. (1980) On the existence of a cometary belt beyond Neptune, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 192, 481–491.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernández, J. A., and W.-H. Ip (1983) On the time evolution of the cometary influx in the region of the terrestrial planets, Icarus 54, 377–387.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández, J. A. (1985) Dynamical capture and physical decay of short-period comets, Icarus 64, 308–319.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Grieve, R. A. F., and Dence, M. R. (1979) The terrestrial cratering record II. The crater production rate, Icarus 38, 230–242.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Havnes, O. (1967) The effect of repeated close approaches to Jupiter on short-period comets, Icarus 12, 331–337.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hills, J. G. (1981) Comet showers and the steady-state infall of comets from the Oort cloud, Astron. J. 86, 1730–1740.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lecar, M., and Franklin, F. A. (1973) On the original distribution of the asteroids, I, Icarus 20, 422–436.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsden, B. G. (1985) Nongravitational forces on comets: The first fifteen years, in A. Carusi and G. B. Valsecchi (eds.), Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsden, B. G. (1986) I.A.U. Catalogue of cometary orbits. Smithsonian Astrophysical Obs., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  16. Milani, A., Hahn, G., Carpino, M., and Nobili, A. M. (1989) Dynamics of planet-crossing asteroids: Classes of orbital behaviour. Project Spaceguard, Icarus 78, 212–269.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Öpik, E. J. (1951) Collision probabilities with the planets and the distribution of interplanetary matter, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 54A, 165–199.Google Scholar
  18. Öpik, E. J. (1961) The survival of comets and cometary material, Astron. J. 66, 381–382.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Öpik, E. J. (1963) Survival of comet nuclei and the asteroids, Advan. Astron. Astrophys. 2, 219–262.Google Scholar
  20. Scholl, H., and Froeschlé, C. H. (1986) The effects of the secular resonances v 16 and v 5 on asteroid orbits, Astron. Astrophys. 170, 134–144.Google Scholar
  21. Sekanina, Z. (1969) Dynamical and evolutionary aspects of gradual deactivation and disintegration of short-period comets, Astron. J. 74, 1223–1234.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sekanina, Z. (1971) A core-mantle model for cometary nuclei and asteroids of possible cometary origin, in T. Gehreis (ed.), Physical Studies of Minor Planets, NASA SP-267, pp. 423–428.Google Scholar
  23. Shoemaker, E. M. (1977) Astronomically observable crater-forming projectiles, in D. J. Roddy, R. O. Pepin and R. B. Merrill (eds.), Impact and Explosion Cratering Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 617–628.Google Scholar
  24. Shoemaker, E. M., Williams, J. G., Helin, E. F., and Wolfe, R. F. (1979) Earth-crossing asteroids: orbital classes, collision rates with Earth, and origin, in T. Gehreis (ed.), Asteroids, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 253–282.Google Scholar
  25. Shoemaker, E. M., and Wolfe, R. F. (1984) Evolution of the Uranus-Neptune planetesimal swarm, Lunar Planet. Sci. XV, 780–781.ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Stagg, C. R., and Bailey, M. E. (1989) Stochastic capture of short-period comets, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. In press.Google Scholar
  27. Torbett, M. V. (1989) Chaotic motion in a comet disk beyond Neptune: The delivery of short-period comets, Preprint.Google Scholar
  28. Weissman, P. R. (1980) Physical loss of long-period comets, Astron. Astrophys. 85, 191–196.ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Weissman, P. R. (1986) The Oort cloud and the galaxy, in R. Smoluchowski, J. N. Bahcall and M. S. Matthews (eds.), The Galaxy and the Solar System, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 204–237.Google Scholar
  30. Weissman, P. R., A’Hearn, M. F., McFadden, L. A., and Rickman, H. (1989) Evolution of comets into asteroids, in press, in R. Binzel, T. Gehrels and M. S. Matthews (eds.), Asteroids II, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  31. Weissman, P. R. (1989) The cometary impactor flux at the Earth. Preprint of ms. submitted to Proceedings of the conference on global catastrophes in Earth history, Snowbird, Utah, October 1988. In press.Google Scholar
  32. Wetherill, G. W. (1968a) Dynamical studies of asteroidal and cometary orbits and their relation to the origin of meteorites, in L. H. Ahrens (ed.), Origin and Distribution of the Elements, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 423–443.Google Scholar
  33. Wetherill, G. W. (1968b) Relationships between orbits and sources of chondritic meteorites, in P. Millman (ed.), Meteorite Research, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 573–589.Google Scholar
  34. Wetherill, G. W. (1979) Steady-state population of Apollo-Amor objects, Icarus 37, 96–112.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wetherill, G. W. (1985) Asteroidal source of ordinary chondrites, Meteoritics 20, 1–22.ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Wetherill, G. W. (1987) Dynamic relationships between asteroids, meteorites, and Apollo-Amor objects, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. of London A323, 323–337.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wetherill, G. W. (1988) Where do the Apollo objects come from? Icarus 76, 1–18.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wetherill, G. W. (1989) Cratering of the terrestrial planets by Apollo objects, Meteoritics 24, 15–22.ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. Wetherill, G. W., and Williams, J. G. (1968) Evaluation of the Apollo asteroids as sources of stone meteorites, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 635–648.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wetherill, G. W., and Williams, J. G. (1979) Origin of Differentiated Meteorites, in L. H. Ahrens (ed.), Origin and Distribution of the Elements Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
  41. Whipple, F. L. (1950) A comet model I. The acceleration of comet Encke, Astrophys. J. 111, 375–394.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whipple, F. L. (1951) A comet model II. Physical relations for comets and meteors, Astrophys. J. 113, 464–474.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, J. G. (1973) Meteorites from the asteroid belt? (abstract), Eos 54, 233.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, J. G. and Faulkner, J. (1981) The positions of secular resonant surfaces, Icarus 46, 390–399.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wisdom, J. (1983) Chaotic behavior and the origin of the 3/1 Kirkwood gap, Icarus 56, 51–74.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wisdom, J. (1985) Meteorites may follow a chaotic route to Earth, Nature 315, 731–733.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeomans, D. K. (1988) A new look at cometary nongravitational forces, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 20, 841–842.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. W. Wetherill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Terrestrial MagnetismCarnegie Institution of WashingtonWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations