Beyond Husserl: Bracketing “All Possible Worlds”

  • Cornelis A. Van Peursen
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 36)


Beyond Husserl? The title seems pretentious, unless it be taken in the sense so frequently expressed by Husserl himself when he said that he would like to start his philosophy all over again. He said this to Eugen Fink, not long before he died, and he, indeed, began his philosophy all over again when he started his Logical Investigations and again when he wrote his Formal and Transcendental Logic or, later, his Krisis and even in the various notes in which he wrestled with the far reaching but always ambiguous notion of the Passive Synthesis.


Religious Experience Personal Knowledge Pure Possibility Universal Rationality Concrete World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. W. Leibniz, Lettre à Arnauld, 1686. Werke (ed. Gerhardt) II, pp. 54–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Scholtz, Metaphysik als strenge Wissenschaft (Cologne: 1941), p. 140.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.g., E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie I (The Hague: 1956), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie II (The Hague: 1959), p. 50; cf. p. 416, E. Phil. I, pp. 256–257.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie III (The Hague: 1952), p. 142.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie I (The Hague: 1950), p. 312; E. Husserl, Krisis (The Hague: 1954), p. 147.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Husserl, Krisis, (The Hague: 1954), p. 190.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Husserl, Krisis, (The Hague: 1954), pp. 376, 385; cf. T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, rev. ed. (Chicago, Lordon: 1970), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. R. Poprer, “Replies to My Critics” in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper (La Salle, Ill.: 1974), pp. 984–986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (London: 1958), pp. 65, 300–303.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. R. Popper, J. Eccles, The Self and Its Brain (Heidelberg, London, New York: 1977), pp. 209, 210.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Husserl, Krisis, (The Hague: 1954), pp. 114–116; E. Husserl Erste Philosophie II, The Hague: 1959, pp. 101–110; Zeitbwe-wusstsein (The Hague: 1966), p. 75.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. van Peursen, “La notion du temps et de l’ego transcendental chez Husserl” in Husserl. Cahiers de Royaumont (Paris: 1959). English transl, in C. A. van Peursen, Phenomenology and Reality (Pittsburgh: 1972), pp. 67–91.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie I, (The Hague: 1950), p. 191.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. A. van Peursen, “Ars inveniendi in Leibniz,” Studia Leibnitiana XVIII (1986), 183–194, esp. 187.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Th. Nickles, “Introduction” in Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, ed. Th. Nickles (Dordrecht: 1980), pp. 1–59, esp.; 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Polanyi, H. Prosch, Meaning (Chicago, London: 1975), 194–197.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus (London: 1922), 5. 4731. Cf. Husserl, e.g., Formale und transzendentale Logic (The Hague: 1974), pp. 208–209.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, rev. ed. (London: 1968), p. 59.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E.g., M. H. Segall, D. T. Campbell, M. J. Herskovits, The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception (New York: 1966); B. Berlin, P. Kay, Basic Colour Terms (Berkeley: 1969). E. H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion, rev. ed. (London: 1961).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Husserl, Krisis, (The Hague: 1954), pp. 141–142, 347: E. Husserl, Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität III (The Hague: 1973), pp. 613–617.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Levinas, “Phenomenology and the Non-Theoretical” in Facts and Values, M. C. Doeser, J. N. Kraayeds. (Dordrecht: 1986), pp. 109–119, esp. 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Bunge, Treatise in Basic Philosophy, Vol. 3 (Dordrecht: 1977), p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Rorty, The Mirror of Nature (Oxford: 1980), pp. 174, 319.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Putnam, Realism and Reason (Cambridge: 1983), pp. 234–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Hesse, The Structure of Scientific Inference (Berkeley, London: 1974), p. 302.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Schapp, Philosophie der Geschichten (Leer: 1959), 12.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. A. van Peursen, Wirklichkeit als Ereignis (Freiburg, Munich: 1971), pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Husserl, Krisis, (The Hague: 1954), pp. 114–116; C. A. van Peursen, “La notion du temps et de l’ego transcendental chez Husserl” in Husserl. Cahiers de Royaumont (Paris: 1959).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Ricoeur, “Life, a Story in Search of a Narrator” in Facts and Values, pp. 121–132, esp 130-132.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie I (The Hague: 1950), p. 248.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelis A. Van Peursen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeydenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations