Abstract
Most of us have from childhood had strongly realistic intuitions in the sense that we believe the physical world to exist independently of whether or not it is observed or can be observed; similarly, we feel quite certain that the properties things have do not depend for their exemplification on whether we cognize them or not. Almost everyone believes that the moon is there without looking to check, and that it would have the mountains it has even if it were not possible to send a space shuttle around it. So facts about the physical world are not something we produce but exist independently of our mental capacities. This view underlies our everyday dealings with the natural world and other human beings, but it has also played a crucial role in the presuppositions underlying most scientific activity. Thus the aim of science has been to produce an objective description of the world to the extent that its nature and structure is undisturbed by human interests, emotions and values. At length, after a great deal of labor, scientists have succeeded in constructing an objective picture of the world according to which physical reality consists of entities which are built out of atoms and the forces at work among them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Essays, p. 5.
J. Faye, The reality of the future, pp. 85 ff.
See C. Wright, Realism, Meaning and Truth, Oxford 1987, p. 5 and pp. 148-49.
S.A. Pedersen, “Kan matematiske og fysiske teorier tolkes realistisk?” (May mathematical and physical theories be interpreted realistically?), Nyere dansk filosofi, Philosophia 1984, 1–19.
W.H. Newton-Smith, The Rationality of Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1981, p. 40 f.
H. Folse, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr, p. 237.
Ibid., pp. 234-37.
Ibid., pp. 231-32 and 243-45.
APHK, p. 26.
H. Folse, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr, pp. 237–40 and 243-45.
Ibid., p. 240.
Idem.
Ibid., p. 238; cf. p. 257 also.
See some of Folse’s more recent papers, “Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism”, PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. I, ed. by A. Fine and P. Machamer, East Lansing, PSA, 1986, 96–104; “Niels Bohr’s Concept of Reality”, Symposion on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1987: The Copenhagen Interpretation 60 Years After the Come Lecture — Joensuu, Finland, August 6-8,1987, by Pekka Lahti and Peter Mittelstaedt, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore 1987, 161-79; and “Complementarity and our Knowledge of Nature”, Nature, Cognition, and System, Vol 2, ed. by Mark Carvallo, Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990.
ATDN, pp. 102–03, italics mine.
Ibid., p. 93.
E. Mach, Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklungsgeschichte, Darmstadt 1976, pp. 466–67.
E. Mach, Erkenntnis und Irrtum, Darmstadt 1976, pp. 8 ff.
H. Folse, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr, pp. 247 ff.
Niels Bohr Archive, BSC: 27. Letter of 2 March 1953 from Niels Bohr to Max Born in which Bohr quotes Born from a preprint of the article “The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”.
Niels Bohr Archive, BSC: 25. Letter of 2. March 1953 from Niels Bohr to Max Born.
Niels Bohr Archive, BSC: 27. Letter of 10 March 1953 from Max Born to Niels Bohr.
Niels Bohr Archive, BSC: 27. Letter of 26 March 1953 from Niels Bohr to Max Born.
H. Høffding, “Om Réalisme i Videnskab og Tro” (On Realism in Science and Faith), Mindre Arbejder, I, p. 7.
Den menneskelige Tanke, p. 106.
Idem.
APHK, pp. 78–79.
ATDN, p. 18.
Essays, p. 7; cf. p. 3. also.
See M. Dummett, “Realism”, Synthese, 52 (1982), 55–112, pp. 94 ff.
APHK, p.67.
Essays, p. 1.
Ibid., p. 4.
APHK, p. 72; cf. also Essays, p. 3.
APHK, p. 80.
Ibid., p. 26.
See, for instance, M. Dummett, “The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic”, Truth and other Enigmas, Duckworth, London 1978, 215–247.
APHK, p. 11.
Ibid., p. 67.
Ibid., p. 68.
See, for instance, W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass. 1964, pp. 16 f. and p. 44
Aa. Petersen, Quantum Physics and the Philosophical Tradition, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge 1968, pp. 135–37.
Ibid., p. 138.
Idem.
Ibid., p. 147 f.
Ibid., pp. 163-64.
Ibid., 149.
Ibid., pp. 185 ff.
APHK, p. 90.
Essays, p. 6.
See, for instance, APHK, p. 73.
“The Causality Problem in Atomic Physics”, p. 19; see also pp. 23-24.
D. Murdoch, Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics, p. 107.
Ibid, p. 151 and p. 230.
APHK, p. 51.
D. Murdoch, Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics, p. 192.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faye, J. (1991). Chapter VIII. In: Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. Science and Philosophy, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3200-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3200-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5411-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3200-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive