Advertisement

Interaction between contraction and coronary flow: Experiment

  • Jos A. E. Spaan
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 124)

Abstract

It is clear from the preceding two chapters, that a universally accepted model of the coronary circulation has not yet been formulated. This implies that the mechanics of interaction between cardiac contraction and coronary flow are not yet properly understood.

Keywords

Coronary Flow Left Ventricular Pressure Waterfall Model Unstressed Volume Microsphere Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ashikawa K, Kanatsuka H, Suzuki T, Takishima T (1984) A new microscope system for the continuous observation of the coronary microcirculation in the beating canine left ventricle. Microvasc. Res. 28: 387–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Aversano T, Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty JM Jr (1984) Preloadinduced alterations in capacitance-free diastolic pressure-flow relationships. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 15): H410–H417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Azuma T, Oka S (1971) Mechanical equilibrium of blood vessel walls. Am. J. Physiol. 221: 1310–1321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bache RJ, Cobb FR (1977) Effect of maximal coronary vasodilation on transmural myocardial perfusion during tachycardia in the awake dog. Circ. Res. 41: 648–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bellamy RF (1978) Diastolic coronary pressure-flow relations in the dog. Circ. Res. 43: 92–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bellamy RF, O’Benar JD (1984) Cessation of arterial and venous flow at a finite driving pressure in porcine coronary circulation. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 15): H525–H531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bruinsma P, Arts T, Dankelman J, Spaan JAE (1988) Model of the coronary circulation based on pressure dependence of coronary resistance and compliance. Basic Res. Cardiol. 83: 510–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Canty JM Jr, Klocke FJ, Mates RE (1987) Characterization of capacitance-free pressure-flow relations during single diastoles in dogs using an RC model with pressure-dependent parameters. Circ. Res. 60: 273–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Canty JM Jr, Klocke FJ, Mates RE (1985) Pressure and tone dependence of coronary diastolic input impedance and capacitance. Am. J. Physiol. 248 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 17): H700–H711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Carew TE, Covell JW (1979) Effect of intramyocardial pressure on the phasic flow in the intraventricular septal artery. Cardiovasc. Res. 10: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chadwick RS, Tedgui A, Michel JB, Ohayon J, Levy BI (1990) Phasic regional myocardial inflow and outflow: comparison of theory and experiments. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 27): H1687–H1698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Chilian WM, Marcus ML (1982) Phasic coronary flow velocity in intramural and epicardial coronary arteries. Circ. Res. 50: 775–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Chilian WM, Marcus ML (1984) Coronary venous outflow persists after cessation of coronary arterial inflow. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 16): H984–H990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dankelman J, Stassen HG, Spaan JAE (1990) Coronary circulation mechanics. In: Coronary circulation. Basic mechanism and clinical relevance. Eds. Kajiya F, Klassen GA, Spaan JAE, Hoffman JIE. Springer-Verlag Tokyo: 75–87.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Dole WP, Bishop VS (1982) Influence of autoregulation and capacitance on diastolic coronary artery pressure-flow relationships in the dog. Circ. Res. 51: 261–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Downey JM, Kirk ES (1975) Inhibition of coronary blood flow by a vascular waterfall mechanism. Circ. Res. 36: 753–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Eng C, Jentzer JH, Kirk ES (1982) The effects of the coronary capacitance on the interpretation of diastolic pressure-flow relationships. Circ. Res. 50: 334–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Flynn AE, Coggins DL, Aldea GS, Austin RE, Goto M, Husseini W, Hoffman JIE (1989) Ventricular contraction increases subepicardial blood flow: evidence for a deep myocardial pump. FASEB J. 3: A1305.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Goto M, Tsujioka K, Ogasawara Y, Wada Y, Tadaoka S, Hira-matsu O, Yanaka M, Kajiya F (1990) Effect of blood filling in intramyocardial vessels on coronary arterial inflow. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 27): H1042–H1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hanley FL, Messina LM, Grattan MT, Hoffman JIE (1984) The effect of coronary inflow pressure on coronary vascular resistance in the isolated dog heart. Circ. Res. 54: 760–772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Heineman FW, Grayson J (1985) Transmural distribution of intramyocardial pressure measured by micropipette technique. Am. J. Physiol. 249 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 18): H1216–H1223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Hoffman JIE, Spaan JAE (1990) Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation. Physiol. Rev. 70: 331–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ito Y, Kitamura K, Kuriyama H (1979) Effect of acetylholine and catecholamines on the smooth muscle cell of the porcine coronary artery. J. Physiol. Lond. 294: 595–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kajiya F, Tsujioka K, Goto M, Wada Y, Ghen XL, Nakai M, Tadaoka S, Hiramatsu O, Ogasawara Y, Mito K, Tomonaga G (1986) Functional characteristics of intramyocardial capacitance vessels during diastole in the dog. Circ. Res. 58: 476–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kanatsuka H, Ashikawa K, Komaru T, Suzuki T, Takishima T (1990) Diameter change and pressure-red blood cell velocity relations in coronary microvessels during long diastoles in the canine left ventricle. Circ. Res. 66: 503–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Klassen GA, Zborowska-Sluis DT (1979) The eifect of myocardial force on coronary transmural flow distribution. Cardiovasc. Res. 13: 365–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty JM Jr, Eclit AK (1985) Coronary pressure-flow relationships. Controversial issues and probable implications. Circ. Res. 56: 310–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty JM Jr, Eclit AK (1985) Response to the article by Spaan on ‘Coronary diastolic pressure-flow relation and zero flow pressure explained on the basis of intramyocardial compliance’(Circ. Res. 56: 293–309, 1985) Circ. Res. 56: 791–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Klocke FJ, Weinstein IR, Klocke JF, Eclit AK, Kraus DR, Mates RE, Canty JM, Anbar RD, Romanowski RR, Wallmeyer KW, Echt MP (1981) Zero-flow pressures and pressure-flow relationships during single long diastoles in the canine coronary bed before and during maximum vasodilation. J. Clin. Invest. 68: 970–980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N (1989) Can coronary systolicdiastolic flow difference be predicted by left ventricular pressure of time varying intramyocardial elastance? Basic Res. Cardiol. 84: 149–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Krams R (1988) The effect of cardiac contraction on coronary flow. Introduction to a new concept. PhD Thesis. Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Krams R, Sipkema P, Zegers J, Westerhof N (1989) Contractility is the main determinant of coronary systolic flow impediment. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H1936–1944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Lee J, Chambers DE, Akizuki S, Downey JM (1984) The role of vascular capacitance in the coronary arteries. Circ. Res. 55: 751–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Magder S (1990) Starling resistor versus compliance which explains the zero-flow pressure of a dynamic arterial pressure-flow relation?. Circ. Res. 67: 209–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Marzilli M, Goldstein S, Sabbah HN, Lee T, Stein PD (1979) Modulating effect of regional myocardial performance on local myocardial perfusion in the dog. Circ. Res. 45: 634–640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Mates RE, Klocke F J, Canty JM Jr (1987) Impedance to coronary flow. In: Activation, Metabolism and Perfusion of the Heart. Eds. Sideman S, Beyar R. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Messina LM, Hanley FL, Uhlig PN, Baer RW, Grattan MT, Hoffman JIE (1985) Effects of pressure gradients between branches of the left coronary artery on the pressure axis intercept and the shape of steady state circumflex pressure-flow relations in dogs. Circ. Res. 56: 11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Parsons WJ, Rembert JC, Bauman RP, Greenfield Jr JC, Paintadosi CA (1990) Dynamic mechanisms of cardiac oxygenation during brief ischemia and reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. 259 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 28): H1477–H1485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Spaan JAE (1985) Coronary diastolic pressure-flow relation and zero flow pressure explained on the basis of intramyocardial compliance. Circ. Res. 56: 293–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Spaan JAE (1985) Response to the article by Klocke et al. on ‘Coronary pressure-flow relationships: controversial issues and probable implications’. (Circ. Res. 56: 310–323, 1985). Circ. Res. 56: 789–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Spaan JAE (1979) Does coronary resistance change only during systole? Circ. Res. 45: 838–839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Tsujioka K, Goto M, Hiramatsu O, Wada Y, Ogasaware Y, Kajiya F (1990) Functional characteristics of intramyocardial capacitance vessels and their effects on coronary arterial inflow and venous outflow. In: Coronary circulation. Basic mechanism and clinical relevance. Springer-Verlag Tokyo.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Tangelder GJ, Slaaf DW, Reneman RS Skeletal muscle microcirculation and changes in transmural and perfusion pressures. Prog. Appl. Microcirc. 5: 93–108.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Tomonaga G, Tsujioka K, Ogasawara Y, Nakai M, Mito K, Hiramatsu O, Kajiya F (1984) Dynamic characteristics of diastolic pressure-flow relation in the canine coronary artery. In: The Coronary Sinus. Eds. Mohl W, Wolner E, Glogar D. Steinkoff Verlag Darmstadt, Springer-Verlag New York: 79–85.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    VanWinkle DM, Swafford AN, Downey JM (1990) The subendocardial extravascular resistance in dog hearts is independent of ventricular lu-menal pressure. FASEB J. 4: A946.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Vergroesen I, Noble MIM, Spaan JAE (1987) Intramyocardial blood volume change in first moments of cardiac arrest in anesthetized goats. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 22): H307–H316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Watanabe J, Maruyama Y, Satoh S, Keitoku M, Takashima T (1987) Effects of the pericardium on the diastolic left coronary pressure-flow relationship in the isolated dog heart. Circulation 75: 670–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Westerhof N (1990) Physiological hypotheses-Intramyocardial pressure. A new concept, suggestions for measurement. Basic Res. Cardiol. 85: 105–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jos A. E. Spaan
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiovascular Research Institute Amsterdam (CRIA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations