Skip to main content

Assessment in Context: The Alternative to Standardized Testing

  • Chapter
Changing Assessments

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 30))

Abstract

A familiar scene almost anywhere in the United States today: Several hundred students file into a large examination hall. They sit nervously, waiting for sealed packets to be handed out. At the appointed hour, booklets are distributed, brief instructions are issued, and formal testing begins. The hall is still as students at each desk bear down on number two pencils and fill in the bubbles which punctuate the answer sheets. A few hours later, the testing ends and the booklets are collected; several weeks later, a sheet bearing a set of scores arrives at each student’s home and at the colleges to which the students have directed their scores. The results of a morning’s testing become a powerful factor in decisions about the future of each student.

Research described in this chapter has been supported by the Grant Foundation, the Lilly Endowment, the Markle Foundation, the McDonnell Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, the Van Leer Foundation, and the U.S. Center for Technology in Education of the Bank Street College of Education. For their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, I am indebted to Bernard Gifford, Drew Gitomer, Catherine O’ Connor, Robert Steinberg, and Joseph Walters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiken, W. 1942. The story of the Eight Year Study. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. 1987. Inspection time and the development of intelligence. Paper delivered to British Psychological Society Conference, Sussex University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. 1982. Revisiting children’s drawings of simple rhythms: A function for reflection-in-action. In U-shaped behavioral growth, ed. S. Strauss. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S., and D. Baer. 1965. Child development. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., and T. Simon. 1905. Methodes nouvelles pour le diagnostique du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L’annee psychologique II:245–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N., and G. Dworkin. 1976. The IQ controversy. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. 1987. The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. 1978. The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:173–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Herrnstein, R. 1975. Psychology. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buros, O. 1978. The eighth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, New Jersey: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carini, P. 1987. Another way of looking. Paper presented at the Cambridge School Conference, Weston, Massachusetts, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. 1985. Intellectual development: Birth to adolescence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman. In press. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Cognition and instruction: issues and agendas, ed. L. Resnick. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. 1984. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., and R. Snow. 1977. Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irving ton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K. P., and T. Angelo. 1988. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1988. Society, culture, and persons: A systems view of creativity. In The nature of creativity, ed. R. Steinberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., and R. Robinson. 1986. Culture, time, and the development of talent. In Conceptions of giftedness, ed. R. Sternberg and J. Davidson. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. 1987. Structure and magic in discipline-based arts education. In Proceedings of a National Invitational Conference, Los Angeles: The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. 1967. Intelligence assessment: A theoretical and experimental approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology 37:81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. 1979. The nature and measurement of intelligence. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. 1980. Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W. 1980. A theory of cognitive development. Psychological Review 87:477–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1975. The shattered mind. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1982. Art, mind, and brain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1985. The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1986. The development of symbolic literacy. In Toward a greater understanding of literacy, ed. M. Wrolstad and D. Fisher. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1987a. Developing the spectrum of human intelligence. Harvard Education Review 57:187–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1987b. An individual-centered curriculum. In The schools we’ve got, the schools we need. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1988a. Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In The nature of creativity, ed. R. J. Sternberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1988b. Mobilizing resources for individual-centered education. In Technology in education: Looking toward 2020, ed. R. Nickerson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1989a. Balancing specialized and comprehensive knowledge. In Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count, ed. T. Sergiovanni. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1989b. The school of the future. In The reality club, ed. J. Brockman. New York: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1989c. Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL. Studies in Art Education 30 (2): 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., and C. Wolf. 1988. The fruits of asynchrony: Creativity from a psychological point of view. Adolescent psychiatry 15:106–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., V. Howard, and D. Perkins. 1974. Symbol systems: A philosophical, psychological and educational investigation. In Media and symbols, ed. D. Olson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. 1978. Cognitive development. Annual Review of Psychology 29:297– 332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getty Center for Education in the Arts. 1985. Beyond creating: The Place for art in American schools. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. 1976. Languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. 1981. The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., ed. 1978. On competence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G. 1988. The world we created at Hamilton High. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. 1981. Darwin on man. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. 1985. Giftedness and moral responsbility: Creative thinking and human survival. In The gifted and talented: developmental perspectives, ed. F. Horowitz and M. O’Brien. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist 5:444–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. 1967. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, T., and H. Gardner. 1986. From testing intelligence to assessing competences: A pluralistic view of intellect. The Roeper Review 8:147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. 1987. Cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, B. 1962. The tyranny of testing. New York: Crowel-Collier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. 1972. Inequality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. 1980. Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. 1987. Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In Speed of information processing and intelligence, ed. P. Vernon. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., and N. Kogan. 1970. Individual variation in cognitive processing. In Handbook of child psychology, ed. P. Mussen. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. 1983. Process and achievement revisited. In Toward a holistic developmental psychology, ed. S. Wapner and B. Kaplan. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. 1982. Culture and intelligence. In Handbook of human intelligence, ed. R. J. Steinberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. 1942. Philosophy in a new key. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. 1980. What’s special about experiments as contexts for thinking? Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 2:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkus, U., D. Feldman, and H. Gardner. 1988. Dimensions of mind in early childhood. In The psychological bases of early childhood, ed. A. D. Pelligrini. Chichester, U. K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. 1988. Validity. In Educational measurement. 3d ed., ed. R. Linn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. 1988. Children flourish here: 8 teachers and a theory changed a school world. Education Week 7 (18): 1,18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. 1981. The mind’s best work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. 1983. Piaget’s theory. In Manual of child psychology, ed. P. Mussen. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D., and C. Finn. 1987. What do our seventeen-year-olds know? New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. 1987. The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher 16 (9): 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. 1982. Integrating context and cognitive development. In Advances in developmental psychology, vol. 2, ed. M. Lamb and A. Brown. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. 1986. Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In Practical Intelligence, ed. R. Sternberg and R. K. Wagner. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. 1984. Horace’s compromise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. 1986. Mechanisms of memory. Science 232:1612–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. 1977. Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. 1985. Beyond IQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., ed. 1988. The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. 1982. U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. 1938. Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzgiris, I., and J. McV. Hunt. 1966. An instrument for assessing infant intellectual development. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. 1971. The intelligence/creativity distinction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. 1985. Creativity testing and giftedness. In The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives, ed. F. Horowitz and M. O’Brien. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, J., and H. Gardner. 1986. The crystallizing experience. In Conceptions of giftedness, ed. R. Sternberg and J. Davidson. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler-Sherman, C., H. Gardner, and D. H. Feldman. 1988. A pluralistic view of early assessment: The Project Spectrum approach. Theory into Practice 27 (1): 77– 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. 1985. Success in college. New York: College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zessoules, R., D. Wolf, and H. Gardner. 1988. A better balance: ARTS PROPEL as an alternative to discipline-based art education. In Beyond discipline-based art education, ed. J. Burton, A. Lederman, and P. London. North Dartmouth, MA: University Council on Art Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in Context: The Alternative to Standardized Testing. In: Gifford, B.R., O’Connor, M.C. (eds) Changing Assessments. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5318-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2968-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics