Skip to main content

On the Foundations of Prescriptive Decision Analysis

  • Chapter
Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 3))

Abstract

In the recent past, there has been significant interest in the interactions among normative, descriptive, and prescriptive theories of decision making. The volumes by Bell, Raiffa, and Tversky 1988) and Fishburn and LaValle (1989) present numerous viewpoints on these theories. An important aspect of this work is research on sets of axioms for normative decision making. Increasingly, these axioms have tried to account for human characteristics of decision making that have been descriptively observed. Contributions to this work include Bell (1982), Machina (1982), Becker and Sarin (1987), Fishburn (1988), and Luce (1988). Sarin (1988) and Keller (1992) both summarize many key issues of this work. However, these works rarely address the axioms appropriate for prescriptive decision making. That is the main concern of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, J.L., and R.K. Sarin (1987). “Lottery Dependent Utility.” Management Science, 33, 1367–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.E. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.” Operations Research, 30, 961–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H., and A. Tversky (Eds.), (1988). Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A. (1967). “Cardinal Welfare, Individual Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Comment.” Journal of Political Economy, 75, 765–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1988). “Expected Utility: An Anniversary and a New Era.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1988). Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., and I.H. LaValle (Eds.), (1989). Choice Under Uncertainty. Baltzer Scientific Publishing Company, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R.A. (1992). “In Praise of the Old Time Religion.” In W. Edwards (Ed.), Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. (1980). Siting Energy Facilities. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and R.L. Winkler (1985). “Evaluating Decision Stretegies for Equity of Public Risks.” Operations Research, 33, 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L.R. (1989). (1992). “Properties of Utility Theories and Related Empirical Phenomena.” In W. Edwards (Ed.), Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaValle, I.H. (1992). “Small Worlds and Sure Things: Consequentialism by the Back Door.” In W. Edwards (Ed.), Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. (1988). “Rank-dependent, Subjective Expected-utility Representations.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom.” Econometrica, 50, 277–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H., and R. Schlaifer (1964). “The Foundations of Decision Under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition.” Journal of American Statistical Association, 59, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1931). “Truth and Probability.” In R.B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Harcourt Brace, New York.Reprinted in

    Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Kyburg and N.E. Smokier (Eds.), (1964), Studies in Subjective Probability. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, R.P. (1985). “Measuring Equity in Public Risk.” Operations Research, 33, 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, R.P. (1988). “Analytical Issues in Decision Methodology.” In L Horowitz (Ed.), Decision and Organizational Theory. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. (2nd ed.) Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keeney, R.L. (1992). On the Foundations of Prescriptive Decision Analysis. In: Edwards, W. (eds) Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2952-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2952-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-9227-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2952-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics