Skip to main content

Carbon Sequestration Versus Fossil Fuel Substitution: Alternative Roles for Biomass in Coping With Greenhouse Warming

  • Chapter
Global Climate Change

Abstract

Displacing fossil fuel with biomass grown sustainably and converted into useful energy with modern conversion technologies would be more effective in decreasing atmospheric CO2 than sequestering carbon in trees. Some industrial restructuring would be required to bring about a major energy role for biomass. However, the prospect that electricity and liquid fuel from biomass could often be less costly than from coal and petroleum makes this strategy for coping with greenhouse warming inherently easier to implement than many alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. J. Dyson, “Can We Control the Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere?” Energy, 2, pp. 287–291, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Marland, The Prospect of Solving the CO 2 Problem through Global Reforestation, U.S.-DOE/OER Report DOE/NBB-0082, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Houghton, “The Future Role of Tropical Forests in Affecting the Carbon Dioxide Concentration of the Atmosphere,” Ambio, 19(4), pp. 204–209, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Policy Options for Stabilizing the Global Climate, D. A. Lashoff, and D. A. Tirpak, eds., draft report to Congress, February 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. O. Hall and F. Rosillo-Calle, “CO2 Cycling by Biomass: Global Bioproductivity and Problems of Devegetation and Afforestation,” Chapter 9 in Balances in the Atmosphere and the Energy Problem, E. W. A. Lingemon, European Physical Society Symposium, Geneva, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. C. Trexler, Reforesting the United States to Combat Global Warming, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. L. Wright, R. L. Graham, A. F. Turhollow, “Short-Rotation Woody Crop Opportunities to Mitigate Carbon Dioxide Buildup,” presented at the North American Conference on Forestry Responses to Climate Change, Washington, D.C., May 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. F. Wiersum and P. Ketner, “Reforestation: a Feasible Contribution to Reducing the Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Content?” in Climate and Energy, P. A. Okken, R. Swart, and S. Zwerver, eds., pp. 107–124, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Kulp, The Phytosystem as a Sink for Carbon Dioxide, EPRI Report EN-6786, May 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Myers, “The Greenhouse Effect: A Tropical Forestry Response,” Biomass, 18, pp. 73–78, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Postel and L. Heise, Reforesting the Earth, Worldwatch Paper No. 83, Washington, D.C., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Moulton and K. R. Richards, Costs of Sequestering Carbon through Tree Planting and Forest Management in the United States, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ICF, Inc., Preliminary Technology Cost Estimates of Measures Available to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2010, study prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. B. Botkin, “Can We Plant Enough Trees to Absorb all the Greenhouse Gases?” presented at the University of California Global Climate Change Workshop No.2: Energy Policies to Address Global Climate Change, University of California at Davis, September 6-8,1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. O. Hall, “Carbon Flows in the Biosphere: Present and Future,” Journal of the Geological Society, 146, pp. 175–181, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. D. Nordhaus, “The Cost of Slowing Climatic Change: A Survey,” The Energy Journal, 12(1), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Dudek and A. LeBlanc, “Offsetting New CO2 Emissions: A Rational First Greenhouse Policy Step,” Contemporary Policy Issues, 8, pp. 29–42,1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, eds., Climate Change: the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, Chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Resources Institute, World Resources 1990-91, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Kuusela, “Forest Products-World Situation,“ Ambio, 16(2,3), pp. 80–85,1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. A. Hendriks, K. Blok, and W. C. Turkenburg, “The Recovery of Carbon Dioxide from Power Plants,” in Climate and Energy: The Feasibility of Controlling CO 2 Emissions, P. A. Okken, R. I. Swart, and S. Zwerver, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. A. Hendriks, K. Blok, and W. C. Turkenburg, “Technology and Cost of Recovery and Storage of Carbon Dioxide from an Integrated Gasifier Combined Cycle Plant,” unpublished manuscript, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. H. Williams, “Innovative Approaches to Marketing Electric Efficiency,” in Electricity: Efficient End Use and New Generation Technologies and Their Planning Implications, T. B. Johansson, B. Bodlund, and R. H. Williams, eds., Lund University Press, Lund, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Mills, D. Wilson, and T. B. Johansson, “Beginning to Reduce Greenhouse-Gas Emissions Need Not Be Expensive,” invited theme paper for the Second World Climate Conference, Geneva, 29 October-7 November, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Blok, E. Worrell, R. A. W. Albers, R. F. A. Cuelenaere, and W. C. Turkenburg, “The Cost-Effectiveness of Energy Conservation from the Point of View of Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” paper prepared for the 13th World Energy Engineering Congress, Atlanta, 10-12 October, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chem Systems, Inc., Assessment of Cost of Production of Methanol from Biomass, report to the Solar Energy Research Institute, December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Office of Policy, Planning and Analysis, U.S. Dept. of Energy, The Potential of Renewable Energy, An Interlaboratory White Paper, SERIffP-260-3674, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. D. Larson and R. H. Williams, “Biomass-Gasifier Steam-Injected Gas Turbine Cogeneration,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 112, pp.157–163, April 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. M. Ogden, R. H. Williams, and M. E. Fulmer, “Cogeneration Applications of Biomass Gasifier/Gas Turbine Technologies in the Cane Sugar and Alcohol Industries: Getting Started with Bioenergy Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Proceedings of the Conference on Energy and Environment in the 21st Century, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. D. Larson, “Biomass-Gasifier/Gas Turbine Applications in the Pulp and Paper Industry: An Initial Strategy for Reducing Electric Utility CO2 Emissions,” Proceedings of the Ninth EPRI Conference on Coal Gasification Power Plants, Palo Alto, CA, 17-19 October, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Assessment of Costs and Benefits of Flexible and Alternative Fuel Use in the U.S. Transportation Sector. Technical Report Three: Methanol Production and Transportation Cost, August 1989, based on a study prepared for the DOE’s Office of Policy, Planning and Analysis, by Chern Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. T. Gladstone and F. T. Ledig, “Reducing Pressure on Natural Forests Through High-Yield Forestry,” in Forest Ecology and Management, 35, pp. 69–78, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Siren, L. Sennerby-Forsse, and S. Ledin, “Energy Plantations-Short Rotation Forestry in Sweden,” in Biomass: Regenerable Energy, D. O. Hall and R. P. Overend, eds., John Wiley and Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. C. Hummel, W. Palz, and G. Grassi, eds., “Main Conclusions and Proposals,” in Biomass Forestry in Europe: A Strategy for the Future, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. G. R Cannell, “Physiological Basis of Wood Production,” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 4, pp. 459–490, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Production Yearbook, vol. 41, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. O. J. Parrish, D. O. Wolf, W. L. Daniels, J. S. Cundiff, and D. H. Vaughan, “A FiveYear Screening Study of Herbaceous Energy Crops,” Energy from Biomass and Wastes XIV, D.L. Klass, ed., Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. R. Cushman and A. F. Turhollow, “Selecting Herbaceous Energy Crops for the Southeast and Midwest/Lake States,” Energy From Biomass and Wastes XIV, D.L. Klass, ed., Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  39. W. Fulkerson et al., Energy Technology R&D: What Could Make a Difference? A Study by the Staff of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, vol. 2, Supply Technology, ORNL-6541N2/P2, December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Office of Technology Assessment, Energy from Biological Processes, Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Green Mountain National Forest, Developing Markets for Low Quality Wood: The Wood Supply in Bennington County and Southwestern Vermont, Summary Report, October 5, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. E. Earl, Forest Energy and Economic Development, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 1988, DOE/EIA-0219(88), United States Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  44. C. H. Strauss and L. L. Wright, “Woody Biomass Production Costs in the United States: An Economic Summary of Commercial Populus Plantation Systems,” Solar Energy, 45(2), pp. 105–110, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. C. H. Strauss, S. C. Grado, P. R. Blankenhorn, and T. W. Bowersox, “Economic Valuations of Multiple Rotation SRIC Biomass Plantations,” Solar Energy, 41(2), pp. 207–214,1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Formulation of Response Strategies, report prepared for IPCC by Working Group III, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, eds., Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, Policymakers Summary.

    Google Scholar 

  48. W. Vergara, N. E. Hay, and C. W. Hall, Natural Gas: Its Role and Potential in Economic Development, Westview Special Studies in Natural Resource and Energy Management, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. R. Bolton and D. O. Hall, “Photochemical Conversion and Storage of Solar Energy,” Annual Review of Energy, 4, pp. 353–401, 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. J. Coombs, D.O. Hall, and P. Chartier, Plants as Solar Collectors: Optimizing Productivity for Energy: An Assessment Study, Solar Energy R&D in the European Community, Series E, Volume 4: Energy from Biomass, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  51. “The Noordwijk Declaration on Atmospheric Pollution and Climatic Change,” Ministerial Conference on Atmospheric and Climatic Change, Noordwijk, the Netherlands, November 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. Grainger, “Estimating Areas of Degraded Tropical Lands Requiring Replenishment of Forest Cover,” International Treecrops Journal, 5, pp. 1–2, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  53. W. M. Hao, M. H. Liu, and P. J. Crutzen, “Estimates of Annual and Regional Releases of CO2 and Other Trace Gases from Fires in the Tropics,” in Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Fire Ecology, J. J. Goldhammer, ed., Springer, Berlin, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. New Farm and Forest Products Task Force, New Farm and Forest Products-Responsive to the Challenges and Opportunities Facing American Agriculture, Report to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. J. Weinberg and R. H. Williams, “Energy from the Sun,” Scientific American, 262(9), September 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  56. F. T. Ledig, “Improvement of Eucalyptus for Fuel and Fiber in California,” in Biomass Production by Fast-Growing Trees, J. S. Pereira and U. Landsberg, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  57. I. Stjernquist, “Modern Wood Fuels,” in Bioenergy and the Environment, J. Pasztor and L. A. Kristoferson, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  58. C. P. Mitchell, “Nutrients and Growth Relations in Short-Rotation Forestry,” Biomass, 22, pp. 91–105, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. D. S. DeBell, C. D. Whitesell, and T. H. Schubert, “Using N2-Fixing Albizia to Increase Growth of Eucalyptus Plantations in Hawaii,” Forest Science, 35(1), pp. 64–75, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  60. S. Linder, “Nutritional Control of Forest Yield,” in Nutrition of Trees, Marcus Wallenberg Foundation Symposia, 6, Falun, Sweden, pp. 62–87, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. P. Kimmins, “Modelling the Sustainability of Forest Production and Yield for a Changing and Uncertain Future,” The Forest Chronicle, 6, pp. 271–280, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  62. S. G. Nilsson, “Density and Species Richness of Some Forest Bird Communities in South Sweden,” Oikos, p. 392–401, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J.C. Corman, Systems Analysis of Simplified IGCC Plants, report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, N.Y., ET-14928-13, September 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  64. A. A. Pitrilo and L. E. Graham, “DOE Activities Supporting IGCC Technologies,” in Proceedings of a Conference on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Plants for Canadian Utility Applications, Ch. 1A, Canadian Electrical Association, Montreal, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  65. A. Ahlstrom Corporation, “Sydkraft AB, Sweden and A. Ahlstrom, Finland Goes Ahead with Unique Gasification Process,” press release, November 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  66. R. H. Williams, “Low-Cost Strategies for Coping with CO2 Emission Limits,” The Energy Journal, 11(3), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  67. D. O. Hall and R. P. Overend, eds., Biomass: Regenerable Energy, Wiley, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  68. D. C. Rinebolt, “Biomass Energy: A Maturing Technology,” Biologue, 6(5), pp. 20–23, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, D.O., Mynick, H.E., Williams, R.H. (1991). Carbon Sequestration Versus Fossil Fuel Substitution: Alternative Roles for Biomass in Coping With Greenhouse Warming. In: White, J.C., Wagner, W., Beal, C.N. (eds) Global Climate Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2914-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2914-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-444-01647-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2914-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics