Advertisement

Pain Relief: Ethical Issues and Catholic Teaching

  • Kevin D. O’Rourke
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 41)

Abstract

When caring for a sick person, a physician seeks to cure the person by eliminating or alleviating the illness, disease or injury which causes dysfunction on the part of the patient. But the physician also assumes the responsibility to alleviate the pain which results from the original disease or injury, or from the therapy which is directed toward cure. For several centuries, physicians were more able to assuage pain than they were to remove or alleviate the source of it. In the latter half of this century remarkable progress has been made in alleviating and removing pain. Determining which medications to use, to relieve serious pain, and how much to use, is now a subspecialty in contemporary medicine (Bonica, 1990; Loeser, 1989). The use of medication to relieve pain however, gives rise to two ethical issues: 1) pain medication may impair a patient’s cognitive function, thus making it difficult for the person to prepare for death; 2) pain medication may hasten death. This presentation will study the two ethical issues in light of the teaching of the Catholic Church and explain the reasoning underlying this teaching.

Keywords

Pain Relief Down Syndrome Pain Medication Moral Obligation Double Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American Association of Retired Persons: (1986), Elder Abuse Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Angell, M.: 1988, ‘Euthanasia’, The New England Journal of Medicine 319(20), 1348–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Associated for Study of Pain (I.S.A.P.): 1980, ‘Pain terms: A list with definitions and notes on usage’ Pain, 8, 249–252.Google Scholar
  4. Bonica, J.: 1990, ‘History of pain concepts and therapies’, in Bonica, J. (ed.), The Management of Pain, Len and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 2–18.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, J.: 1980, ‘Toward understanding the principle of double effect’, (90) Ethics, 527.Google Scholar
  6. Congregation for Doctrine of the Faith: 1975, ‘The reality of life after death’, in Flannery, A. (ed.), 1982 Vatican Council II: More Documents, Costello, New York, pp. 500–504.Google Scholar
  7. Congregation for Doctrine of the Faith:’, Declaration on Euthanasia, United States Catholic Conference, Washington, D. C., 6.Google Scholar
  8. Connery, J.: 1981, ‘Catholic ethics, has the norm for role making changed?’ Theological Studies, 42(2), 232–250.Google Scholar
  9. Goldber, R.: 1987, ‘The right to die: The case for and against passive euthanasia’, Disability Handicap and Society, 2(1) 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphry, D.: 1986, The Right to Die: Understanding Euthanasia, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Humphry, D., et al.: 1988, ‘Aid in dying: The right to die or the right to kill — a public forum’, International Review of Natural F amity Planning.Google Scholar
  12. Hyers, T., et al.: 1986, ‘Withholding and withdrawing ventilations’, American Review of Respiratory Distress, 143(6), 1327–1331.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiko, R. et al.: 1986, ‘Clinical Analgesic Studies and Sources of Variation in Analgesic Responses to Morphine’, in Foley, K., Inturrisi, C. (eds.), Opioid Analgesics in the Management of Clinical Pain, Raven Press, New York, pp. 14–24.Google Scholar
  14. Loeser, J. and Kelly, J. (eds.): 1989, Managing the Chronic Pain Patient: Theory and Practice at the University of Washington Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. May, W., et al.: 1990, ‘Criteria for withholding and withdrawing treatment’, Linacre Quarterly, v.5:7 n.3, p.81.Google Scholar
  16. Pitman, B. F.: 1990, ‘Approaches to palliative care: Notes of a death watcher’, in Foley, K, Bionca, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Cancer Pain, Raven Press, New York, pp. 393–397.Google Scholar
  17. Pless, J.: 1983, ‘The story of baby doe’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 604.Google Scholar
  18. Pontifical Council: 1980, Cor Unum, ‘Questions of ethics regarding fatally ill and the dying’, in K. O’Rourke and P. Boyle (eds.), 1989, Medical Ethics: Sources of Catholic Teaching, CHA, 219, 305.Google Scholar
  19. Pope John Paul II: 1984, ‘The Christian Meaning of Suffering’, in Origins, 13, 609–619.Google Scholar
  20. Pope Pius XII: 1944, ‘Christian principles of the medical profession’, in O’Rourke, K. and Boyle, P. (eds.), 1989, Medical Ethics Sources of Catholic Teaching, CHA, pp.217–302.Google Scholar
  21. Pope Pius XII: 1957, ‘Address to Anesthesiologists’, in O’Rourke, K. and Boyle, P. (eds.),’, Medical Ethics Sources of Catholic Teaching, CHA, pp. 217–302.Google Scholar
  22. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1983, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment, U.S. Government Printing Office, 80.Google Scholar
  23. Rahner, K.: 1965, On the Theology of Death, Herder and Herder, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, R. and Horan, D: 1987, ‘Termination of medical treatment: Imminent legislative issues’, Catholic Lawyer, 31(2) 99–11.Google Scholar
  25. Schneiderman, L. J. and Spragg, R.: 1988, ‘Ethical decisions in discontinuing mechanical ventilation’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 318(5) 984–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Twycross, R. and Lack, S.: 1983, Symptom Control in Far Advanced Cancer: Pain Relief, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  27. Vertafridda, V. et al.: 1987, ‘A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief’, Cancer, 59 n.4, 850–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanzer, S. et al.: 1989, ‘The physicians’ responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 320(13) 844–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Welie, J: 1989, ‘Euthanasia in the Netherlands’, unpublished article.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin D. O’Rourke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations