Skip to main content

Beneficence and Moral Requirements

  • Chapter
  • 84 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 55))

Abstract

One task of moral theory is to specify criteria for the correct application of moral concepts, and thereby to provide bases for sound moral appraisals. As I noted in my introductory remarks, the proper objects of moral appraisal include both acts and persons; and since this book is concerned with the extent to which appraisals of either kind rest on other-interested considerations, something needs to be said about the nature of act--and of person-appraisals--and particularly about certain differences which can be drawn between and within the two categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. HA. Prichard, Moral Obligation (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1949), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. William Frankena, Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Beneficence/Benevolence,” p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joel Feinberg, Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See above, pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross, The Right and the Good, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter Five.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Immanuel Kant, The Doctrine of Virtue,trans. by Mary Gregor (New York: Harper and Row, 1964, pp. 40–41).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 49, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michael Stocker, “Supererogation and Duties,’ in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Moral Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kant, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montague, P. (1992). Beneficence and Moral Requirements. In: In the Interests of Others. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2777-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2777-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5233-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2777-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics