Advertisement

To Peep or not to Peep Ards Patients?

  • V. M. Ranieri
  • N. T. Eissa
  • C. Corbeil
  • J. Milic-Emili
Part of the Developments in Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology book series (DCCA, volume 25)

Abstract

PEEP was introduced in 1967 in the treatment of ARDS (1). Suter et al. (2) introduced the concept of “best PEEP” to describe the optimal level of PEEP at which static compliance was the highest. This level was also associated with maximum oxygen delivery and minimum dead space. In general- the beneficial effects of PEEP are thought to be achieved by reeruiting collapsed alveoli and restoring the functional residual capacity (FRC) toward normal (3,4). However, while PEEP is known to increase the endexpiratory lung volume (EELV) in ARDS patients (3,4), with the exception of the studies of Gattinoni's group (5,6) there are no systematic studies in which the recruitment of collapsed lung units due to PEEP has been quantified. Hence, the question remains whether this increase in lung volume simply reflects a displacement of EELV along a fixed static volume pressure (V-P) curve of the respiratory system with concomitant alveolar overinflation or is associated with an upward shift of the static P-V eurve caused by recruitment of previously eollapsed lung units. Assessment of stabe thoracopulmonary V-P curves with the “super-syringe” method has been proposed for diagnosis, staging and management of ARDS patients (7). However, the long time required to perform V-P curves with this method introduces significant errors due to continuing gas exchange.

Keywords

Lung Volume Acute Respiratory Failure Functional Residual Capacity Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Alveolar Recruitment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashbaugh D.G., Bigelow D.B., Petty T.L., Levine B.E.: Acute respiratory disease in adults. Lancet 2:319–23, 1967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suter P.M., Fairley H.B., Isenberg M.D.: Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. N Engl J Med 292: 284–9,1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falke K.I., Pontoppidan H., Kumar A., et al: Ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. I Clin Invest 51:2315–23,1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benito S., Lemaire F.: Pulmonary pressure-volume relationship in acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: role of positive end expiratory pressure. I Crit Care 5:27–34,1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gattinoni L., Pesenti A., Avalli L., et al: Pressure-volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:730–6, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gattinoni L., Pesenti A., Bombino M., et al: Relationships between lung computed tomographic density, gas exchange, and PEEP in acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 69:824–32, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matamis D., Lemaire F., Hart A., et al: Total respiratory pressurevolume curves in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 86: 58–66,1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gattinoni L., Mascheroni D., Basilico E., et al: Volume/pressure curve of total respiratory system in paralyzed patients: artifacts and correction factors. Int Care Med 13: 19–25, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mead I., Collier C.: Relation of volume history of lungs to respiratory mechanics in anesthetized dogs. I Appl Physiol 14: 669–78, 1959Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ranieri V.M., Eissa N.T., Corbeil C., et al: Effects of PEEP on alveolar recruitment and gas exchange on ARDS patients. Am Rev Respir Dis (In Press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy P., Similowski T., Corbeil C., et al: A method for studying the static volume-press ure curves of the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation. I Crit Care 4:83–9, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corbridge T.C., Wood L.D., Crawford G.P., et al: Adverse effects of Iarge tidal volume and low PEEP in canine acid aspiration. Am Rev Respir Dis 142:311–5, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiiski R., Takala I., Kari A., Milic-Emili I.: Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hickling K.G., Henderson S.I., Iackson R.: Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 16:372–7, 1990Google Scholar
  15. ]5.
    Falke K.I.: Do changes in lung compliance allow the determination of “optimal PEEP”? Anaesthetist 29:165–168, 1980Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rossi A., Gottfried S.B., Zocchi L., et al: Measurement of static compliance of the total respiratory system in patients with acute respiratory failure during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:672–7, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matamis D., Lemaire F., Half A., et al: Redistribution of pulmonary blood flow induced by positive end-expiratory pressure and dopamine infusion in acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 129:39–44,1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stoller I.K., Kacmarek R.M.: Ventilatory strategies in the management of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Chest Med 4:755–72, 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. M. Ranieri
  • N. T. Eissa
  • C. Corbeil
  • J. Milic-Emili

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations