Skip to main content

On the Relative Extensions of Modally Qualified Terms

  • Chapter
The Logic of Gersonides

Part of the book series: The New Synthese Historical Library ((SYNL,volume 40))

  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

31. The aunqualifieda terma is more inclusive than the assertoric or non-contingent term, and, in fact, it encompasses each of them. For example, b’moving’ without qualificationb is true of ‘necessarily moving’ and 4assertorically, not non-contingently, moving’. But an unqualified term does not encompass the possible term since the possible term is true of what is not actually that term. For example, ‘possibly moving’ is true of what is not moving, but for which it is possible to move, but ‘moving’ without qualification is not true of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. ha-gebul be-muhlat, ‘the term simpliciter’.

    Google Scholar 

  2. mitno’e’a be-muhlat. Gersonides generally expresses modal qualification in two ways: in the first, shown here, the modal qualifier follows the term it qualifies (in our translation the order is inverted); in the second, the modal term introduces a subordinate clause, as in ’ efshar she-yihyeh mitno‘e’a (translated as ‘will possibly be moving’, ‘may be moving’) or ’tefshar she-yitno‘e’a (translated as ‘will possibly move’, or ‘may move’). Gersonides seems to favor the former when speaking formally, and the latter when speaking loosely and on an ontological level. But this is not a hard and fast rule.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See I.1 above.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lit.: ‘is true with’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Averroes, Middle Commentary on the De Interpretation, fols. 58r-v (23a16-18); cf. C. De Interpretatione, 96v-98v.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ha-’efshari ha-’amiti.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manekin, C.H. (1992). On the Relative Extensions of Modally Qualified Terms. In: The Logic of Gersonides. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2614-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2614-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5155-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2614-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics