Elements of Structural Optimization pp 347-386 | Cite as

# Dual and Optimality Criteria Methods

## Abstract

In most of the analytically solved examples in Chapter 2, the key to the solution is the use of an algebraic or a differential equation which forms the optimality condition. For an unconstrained algebraic problem the simple optimality condition is the requirement that the first derivatives of the objective function vanish. When the objective function is a functional the optimality conditions are the Euler-Lagrange equations (e.g., Eq. (2.2.13)). On the other hand, the numerical solution methods discussed in chapters 4 and 5 (known as *direct search methods*) do not use the optimality conditions to arrive at the optimum design. The reader may have wondered why we do not have numerical methods that mimic the solution process for the problems described in Chapter 2. In fact, such numerical methods do exist, and they are known as optimality criteria methods. One reason that the treatment of these methods is delayed until this chapter is their limited acceptance in the optimization community. While the direct search methods discussed in Chapters 4 and 5 are widely used in many fields of engineering, science and management science, optimality criteria method have been used mostly for structural optimization, and even in this field there are many practitioners that dispute their usefulness.

## Keywords

Design Variable Lagrange Multiplier Optimality Criterion Strain Energy Density Dual Formulation## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]Mitchell, A.G.M., “The Limits of Economy of Material in Framed Structures,” Phil. Mag., 6, pp. 589–597, 1904.Google Scholar
- [2]Cilly, F.H., “The Exact Design of Statically Determinate Frameworks, and Exposition of its Possibility, but Futility,” Trans. ASCE, 43, pp. 353–407, 1900.Google Scholar
- [3]Schmit, L.A., “Structural Design by Systematic Synthesis,” Proceedings 2nd ASCE Conference on Electronic Computation, New York, pp. 105–132, 1960.Google Scholar
- [4]Reinschmidt, K., Cornell, C.A., and Brotchie, J.F., “Iterative Design and Structural Optimization,” J. Strct. Div. ASCE, 92, ST6, pp. 281–318, 1966.Google Scholar
- [5]Razani, R., “Behavior of Fully Stressed Design of Structures and its Relationship to Minimum Weight Design,” AIAA J., 3(12), pp. 2262–2268, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Dayaratnam, P. and Patnaik, S., “Feasibility of Full Stress Design,” AIAA J., 7(4), pp. 773–774, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Lansing, W., Dwyer, W., Emerton, R. and Ranalli, E., “Application of Fully-Stressed Design Procedures to Wing and Empennage Structures,” J. Aircraft, 8(9), pp. 683–688, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Giles, G.L., Blackburn, C.L. and Dixon, S.C., “Automated Procedures for Sizing Aerospace Vehicle Structures (SAVES),” AIAA Paper 72-332, presented at the AIAA/ASME/SAE 13th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 1972.Google Scholar
- [9]Berke, L. and Khot, N.S., “Use of Optimality Criteria for Large Scale Systems,” AGARD Lecture Series No. 170 on Structural Optimization, AGARD-LS-70, 1974.Google Scholar
- [10]Adelman, H.M., Haftka, R.T. and Tsach, U., “Application of Fully Stressed Design Procedures to Redundant and Non-isotropic Structures,” NASA TM-81842, July 1980.Google Scholar
- [11]Adelman, H.M. and Narayanaswami, R., “Resizing procedure for structures under combined mechanical and thermal loading,” AIAA J., 14(10), pp. 1484–1486, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Venkayya, V.B., “Design of Optimum Structures,” Comput. Struct., 1, pp. 265–309, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Siegel, S., “A Flutter Optimization Program for Aircraft Structural Design,” Proc. AIAA 4th Aircraft Design, Flight Test and Operations Meeting, Los Angeles, California, 1972.Google Scholar
- [14]Stroud, W.J., “Optimization of Composite Structures,” NASA TM-84544, August 1982.Google Scholar
- [15]Falk, J.E., “Lagrange Multipliers and Nonlinear Programming,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 19, pp. 141–159, 1967.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Fleury, C., “Structural Weight Optimization by Dual Methods of Convex Programming,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 14(12), pp. 1761–1783, 1979.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]Schmit, L.A., and Fleury, C., “Discrete-Continuous Variable Structural Synthesis using Dual Methods,” AIAA J., 18(12), pp. 1515–1524, 1980.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]Schmit, L.A., and Fleury, C., “Discrete-Continuous Variable Structural Synthesis using Dual Methods,” Paper 79-0721, Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/AHS 20th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, St. Louis, MO, April 4–6, 1979.Google Scholar
- [19]Grierson, D.E., and Lee, W.H., “Optimal Synthesis of Steel Frameworks Using Standard Sections,” J. Struct. Mech., 12(3), pp. 335–370, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]Grierson, D.E., and Lee, W.H., “Optimal Synthesis of Frameworks under Elastic and Plastic Performance Constraints Using Discrete Sections,” J. Struct. Mech., 14(4), pp. 401–420, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]Grierson, D.E., and Cameron, G.E., “Microcomputer-Based Optimization of Steel Structures in Professional Practice,” Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 4(4), pp. 289–296, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]Fleury C., and Braibant, V., “Structural Optimization: A New Dual Method Using Mixed Variables,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 23, pp. 409–428, 1986.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]Prager, W., “Optimality Criteria in Structural Design,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 61 (3), pp. 794–796, 1968.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]Venkayya, V.B, Khot, N.S., and Reddy, V.S., “Energy Distribution in an Optimum Structural Design,” AFFDL-TR-68-156, 1968.Google Scholar
- [25]Berke, L., “An Efficient Approach to the Minimum Weight Design of Deflection Limited Structures,” AFFDL-TM-70-4-FDTR, 1970.Google Scholar
- [26]Venkayya, V.B., Khot, N.S., and Berke, L., “Application of Optimality Criteria Approaches to Automated design of Large Practical Structures,” Second Symposium on Structural Optimization, AGARD-CP-123, pp. 3-1 to 3-19, 1973.Google Scholar
- [27]Gellatly, R.A, and Berke, L., “Optimality Criteria Based Algorithm,” Optimum Structural Design, R.H. Gallagher and O.C., Zienkiewicz, eds., pp. 33–49, John Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
- [28]Khot, N.S., “Algorithms Based on Optimality Criteria to Design Minimum Weight Structures,” Eng. Optim., 5, pp. 73–90, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]Venkayya, V.B., “Optimality Criteria: A Basis for Multidisciplinary Optimization,” Computational Mechanics, Vol. 5, pp. 1–21, 1989.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]Rozvany, G.I.N., Structural Design via Optimality Criteria: The Prager Approach to Structural Optimization, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, Dordrecht, Holland, 1989.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [31]Wilkinson, K. et al. “An Automated Procedure for Flutter and Strength Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles,” AFFDL-TR-75-137, December 1975.Google Scholar
- [32]Khot, N.S., “Optimal Design of a Structure for System Stability for a Specified Eigenvalue Distribution,” in New Directions in Optimum Structural Design (E. Atrek, R.H., Gallagher, K.M., Ragsdell and O.C. Zienkiewicz, editors), pp. 75–87, John Wiley, 1984.Google Scholar
- [33]Venkayya, V.B., “Structural Optimization Using Optimality Criteria: A Review and Some Recommendations,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 13, pp. 203–228, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [34]Berke, L., and Khot, N.S., “Structural Optimization Using Optimality Criteria,” Computer Aided Structural Design: Structural and Mechanical Systems (C.A. Mota Soares, Editor), Springer Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar