Advertisement

Optimum Design of Laminated Composite Structures

  • Raphael T. Haftka
  • Zafer Gürdal
Part of the Solid Mechanics And Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 11)

Abstract

Because of their superior mechanical properties compared to single phase materials, laminated fibrous composite materials are finding a wide range of applications in structural design, especially for lightweight structures that have stringent stiffness and strength requirements. Designing with laminated composites, on the other hand, has become a challenge for the designer because of a wide range of parameters that can be varied, and because the complex behavior and multiple failure modes of these structures require sophisticated analysis techniques. Finding an efficient composite structural design that meets the requirements of a certain application can be achieved not only by sizing the cross-sectional areas and member thicknesses, but also by global or local tailoring of the material properties through selective use of orientation, number, and stacking sequence of laminae that make up the composite laminate. The increased number of design variables is both a blessing and a curse for the designer, in that he has more control to fine-tune his structure to meet design requirements, but only if he can figure out how to select those design variables. The possibility of achieving an efficient design that is safe against multiple failure mechanisms, coupled with the difficulty in selecting the values of a large set of design variables makes structural optimization an obvious tool for the design of laminated composite structures.

Keywords

Design Variable Fiber Orientation Stiffened Panel Laminate Composite Structure Lamination Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Joncs, R. M., Mechanics of Composite Materials, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp. 45–57, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Tsai, S. W., and Pagano N. J., “Invariant Properties of Composite Materials,” in Composite Materials Workshop, (Eds. Tsai, S.W., Halpin, J.C., Pagano, N.J.) Technomic Publishing Co., Westport, pp. 233–253, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Caprino, G., and Crivelli-Visconti, I., “A Note on Specially Orthotopic Laminates,” J. Comp. Matls., 16, pp. 395–399, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gunnink, J. W., “Comment on A Note on Specially Orthotopic Laminates,” J. Comp. Matls., 17, pp. 508–510, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kandil, N., and Verchery, G., “New Methods of Design for Stacking Sequences of Laminates,” Proceedings of the International Conference on “ Computer Aided Design in Composite Material Technology,” Eds. Brebbia, C. A., de Wilde, W. P., and Blain, W. R., pp. 243–257, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schmit, L. A., and Farshi, B., “Optimum Laminate Design for Strength and Stiffness,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 7, pp. 519–536, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Park, W. J., “An Optimal Design of Simple Symmetric Laminates Under the First Ply Failure Criterion,” J. Comp. Matls., 16, pp. 341–355, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Massard, T. N., “Computer Sizing of Composite Laminates for Strength,” J. Reinf. Plastics and Composites, 3, pp. 300–345, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tsai, S. W., and Hahn, H. T., Introduction to Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, Pa., pp. 315–325, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tsai, S. W., “Strength Theories of Filamentary Structures,” in R. T. Schwartz and H. S. Schwartz (eds.), Fundamental Aspects of Fiber Reinforced Plastic, Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 3–11, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Brandmaier, H. E., “Optimum Filament Orientation Criteria,” J. Composite Materials, 4, pp. 422–425, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Miki, M., “Material Design of Composite Laminates with Required In-Plane Elastic Properties,” Progress in Science and Engineering of Composites, Eds., T. Hayashi, K. Kawata, and S. Umekawa, ICCM-IV, Tokyo, Vol. 2, pp. 1725–1731, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Miki, M., “A Graphical Method for Designing Fibrous Laminated Composites with Required In-plane Stiffness,” Trans. JSCM, 9, 2, pp. 51–55, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schmit, L. A., and Farshi, B., “Optimum Design of Laminated Fibre Composite Plates,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 11, pp. 623–640, 1977.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Miki, M., “Optimum Design of Laminated Composite Plates Subject to Axial Compression,” Composites’ 86: Recent Advances in Japan and the United States, Eds., Kawata, K., Umekawa, S., and Kobayashi, A., Proc. Japan-U.S. CCM-III, Tokyo, pp. 673–680, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bert, C. W., “Optimal Design of a Composite-Material Plate to Maximize its Fundamental Frequency,” J. Sound and Vibration, 50(2), pp. 229–237, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Rao, S. S., and Singh K., “Optimum Design of Laminates with Natural Frequency Constraints,” J. Sound and Vibration, 67(1) pp. 101–112, 1979.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mesquita, L., and Kamat, M. P., “Optimization of Stiffened Laminated Composite Plates with Frequency Constraints,” Eng. Opt., 11, pp. 77–88, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Cheng Kengtung, “Sensitivity Analysis and a Mixed Approach to the Optimization of Symmetric Layered Composite Plates,” Eng. Opt., 9, pp. 233–248, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Pedersen, P., “On Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design of Specially Orthotropic Laminates,” Eng. Opt., 11, pp. 305–316, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Muc, A., “Optimal Fiber Orientation for Simply-Supported, Angle-Ply Plates Under Biaxial Compression,” Comp. Struc, 9, pp. 161–172, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Shin, Y. S., Haftka, R. T., Watson, L. T., and Plaut, R. H., “Design of Laminated Plates for Maximum Buckling Load”, J. Composite Materials, 23, pp. 348–369, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Miki, M., and Sugiyama, Y., “Optimum Design of Laminated Composite Plates Using Lamination Parameters,” Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC 32th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Baltimore, MA., Part I, pp. 275–283, April, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Gürdal, Z. and Haftka, R. T., “Optimization of Composite Laminates,” presented at the NATO Advanced Study Intitute on Optimization of Large Structural Systems, Berchtesgaden, Germany, Sept. 23-Oct. 4, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Haftka, R.T., and Walsh, J.L., “Stacking-Sequence Optimization for Buckling of Laminated Plates by Integer Programming, AIAA Journal (in Press).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Schrage, L., Linear, Integer and Quadratic Programming with LINDO, 4th Edition, The Scientific Press, Redwood City CA., 1989.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Nagendra, S., Haftka, R. T., and Gürdal, Z., “Optimization of Laminate Stacking sequence with Stability and Strain Constraints,” submitted for presentation at the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 33th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX., April, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Lombardi, M., “Ottimizzazione di Lastre in Materiale Composito con l’uso di un Metodo di Annealing Simulato,” Tesi di Laurea, Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Pavia, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Le Riche, R., and Haftka, R.T., “Optimization of Laminate Stacking-Sequence for Buckling Load Maximization by Genetic Algorithm,” submitted for presentation at the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 33th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX., April, 1992.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Stroud, W. J., and Agranoff, N., “Minimum-mass Design of Filamentary Composite Panels Under Combined Loadings: Design Procedure Based on Simplified Buckling Equations,” NASA TN D-8257, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Timoshenko, S., Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1936.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Stein, M., and Mayers, J., “Compressive Buckling of Simply Supported Curved Plates and Cylinders of Sandwich Construction,” NACA TN 2601, 1952.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Advanced Composites Design Guide. Vols. I-V, Third Edition, U.S. Air Force, Jan. 1973.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Lekhnitskii, S. G., Anisotropic Plates. Translated by Tsai, S. W., and Cheron, T., Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., Inc., New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Hague, D. S., and Glatt, C.R., “A Guide to the Automated Engineering and Scientific Optimization Program, AESOP,” NASA CR-73201, April 1968.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Stroud, W. J., Agranoff, N., and Anderson, M. S., “Minimum-Mass Design of Filamentary Composite Panels Under Combined Loads: Design Procedure Based on a Rigorous Buckling Analysis,” NASA TN D-8417, July 1977.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Wittrick, W. H., and Williams, F. W., “Buckling and Vibration of Anisotropic or Isotropic Plate Assemblies Under Combined Loadings,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 16, 4, pp. 209–239, April 1974.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Plank, R. J., and Williams, F. W., “Critical Buckling of Some Stiffened Panels in Compression, Shear and Bending,” Aeronautical Q., XXV, Part 3, pp. 165–179, August 1974.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Vanderplaats, G. N., “CONMIN — A Fortran Program for Constrained Function Minimization, User’s Manual,” NASA TM X-62, 282, 1973.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Stroud, W. J., and Anderson, M. S., “PASCO: Structural Panel Analysis and Sizing Code, Capability and Analytical Foundations,” NASA TM 80181, November 1981.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Anderson, M. S., Stroud, W. J., Durling, B. J., and Hennessy, K. W., “PASCO: Structural Panel Analysis and Sizing Code, User’s Manual,” NASA TM 80182, November 1981.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Giles, G. L., and Anderson, M. S., “Effects of Eccentricities and Lateral Pressure on the Design of Stiffened Compression Panels,” NASA TN D-6784, June 1972.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Swanson, G. D., and Gürdal, Z., “Structural Efficiency Study of Graphite-Epoxy Aircraft Rib Structures,” J. Aircraft, 27(12), pp. 1011–1020, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Stroud, W.J., Greene, W.H., and Anderson, M.S., “Buckling Loads of Stiffened Panels Subjected to Combined Longitudinal Compression and Shear: Results Obtained With PASCO, EAL, and STAGS Computer Programs,” NASA TP 2215, January 1984.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Williams, F.W., and Kennedy, D., “User’s Guide to VICON, VIPASA with Constraints,” Department of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, August, 1984.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Williams, F.W., and Anderson, M.S., “Incorporation of Lagrangian Multipliers into an Algorithm for Finding Exact Natural Frequencies or Critical Buckling Loads,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 25,8, pp. 579–584, 1983.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Butler, R., and Williams, F.W., “Optimum Design Features of VICONOPT, an Exact Buckling Program for Prismatic Assemblies of Anisotropic Plates,” Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Long Beach, CA, Part 2, pp. 1289–1299, 1990.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Dickson, J. N., Cole, R. T., and Wang, J. T. S., “Design of Stiffened Composite Panels in the Postbuckling Range,” In Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Eds. Lenoe, E. M., Oplinger, D. W., and Burke, J. J., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 313–327, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Dickson, J. N., and Biggers, S. B., “Design and Analysis of a Stiffened Composite Fuselage Panel,” NASA CR-159302, August 1980.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Shin, D.K., Gürdal, Z., and Griffin, O. H. Jr., “Minimum-Weight Design of Laminated Composite Plates for Postbuckling Performance”, Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 32th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, Part I, pp. 257–266, 1991.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Bushnell, D., “PANDA2 — Program for Minimum Weight Design of Stiffened, Composite, Locally Buckled Panels,” Comput. Struct., 25(4), pp. 469–605, 1987.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Shirk, M. H., Hertz, T. J., and Weisshaar, T. A., “Aeroelastic Tailoring — Theory, Practice, and Promise,” J. Aircraft, 23(1), pp. 6–18, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Lynch, R. W., and Rogers, W. A., “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Materials to Improve Performance,” Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/SAE, 17th Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, King of Prussia, PA., May 5–7, pp. 61–68, 1976.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    McCullers, L. A., “Automated Design of Advanced Composite Structures,” Proceedings of the ASME Structural Optimization Symposium, AMD-7, pp. 119–133, 1974.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    McCullers, L. A., and Lynch, R. W., “Dynamic Characteristics of Advanced Filamentary Composite Structures,” AFFDL-TR-73-111, vol. II, Sept. 1974.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Haftka, R. T., “Structural Optimization with Aeroelastic Constraints: A Survey of US Applications,” Int. J. of Vehicle Design, 7 (3/4), pp. 381–392, 1986.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    McCullers, L. A., and Lynch, R. W., “Composite Wing Design for Aeroelastic Tailoring Requirements,” Air Force Conference on Fibrous Composites in Flight Vehicle Design, Sept. 1972.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Fant, J. A., “An Advanced Composite Wing for the F-16,” paper presented at the 22nd National SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, San Diego, pp. 773–783, April 1977.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Gimmestad, D., “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Composite Winglet for KC-135,” AIAA Paper No. 81-0607, presented at the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 22nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Atlanta, GA., Part 2, pp. 373–376, April 1981.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Wilkinson, K., Markowitz, J., Lerner, E., George, D., and Batill, S. M., “FASTOP: A Flutter and Strength Optimization Program for Lifting Surface Structures,” J. Aircraft, 14(6), pp. 581–587, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Neill, D.J., Johnson, E.H., and Canfield, R., “ASTROS—A Multidisciplinary Automated Structural Design Tool,” J. Aircraft, 27, 12, pp. 1021–1027, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Vanderplaats, G. N., “ADS — A Fortran Program for Automated Design Synthesis,” NASA-CR-177985, Sept. 1985.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Stroud, W. J., “Optimization of Composite Structures,” NASA TM 84544, August 1982.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Nagendra, S., Haftka, R. T., Gürdal, Z., and Starnes, J. H., Jr., “Design of a Blade-Stiffened Composite Panel with a Hole,” Composite Structures, Vol. 18(3), pp. 195–219, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael T. Haftka
    • 1
  • Zafer Gürdal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace and Ocean EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Engineering Science and MechanicsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations