Skip to main content

The Selection of a Sampling Interval for Digitisation: How Fine is Fine Enough?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Digitised Optical Sky Surveys

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library ((ASSL,volume 174))

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

A critical property of digitized sky surveys prepared from photographic materials is the sample interval, δ, used by the microdensitometer. At issue is a tradeoff between coarse sample intervals that, while economical, do not allow the faithful reproduction of the information in photographic material, and fine intervals, which can record all of the information, but at a prohibitive cost. We investigate these issues by conducting Fourier analyses of images characteristic of the imaging process in the absence of noise and by examining the properties of object inventories for a test field digitized at a range of sampling intervals. Both analyses indicate that 15μm is an adequate sampling interval for modern Schmidt plates on Type III emulsions.

The Space Telescope Science Institute is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bunclark, P.S., Irwin, M.J., 1984. ‘Astronomy with Schmidt-type Telescopes’, IAU Colloquium No. 78, p. 147, ed. M. Capaccioli, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, J.E., Postman, M., Oke, J.B., Hoessel, J., Schneider, D.P., 1990. Work in progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, B.M., et al., 1989. ‘Digitised Optical Sky Surveys’, CDS Bull., No. 37, p. 5, ed. C. Jaschek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, B.M., Sturch, C.R., McLean, B.J., Russell, J.L., Jenkner, H., Shara, M.M., 1990. Astron. J., 99, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stobie, R.S., Okamura, S., Davenhall, A.C., MacGillivray, H.T., 1984. Occ. Rept. R.O.E., 14, 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdes, F., 1989. Private communication, NOAO Computer Support Division.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Laidler, V.G., Lasker, B.M., Postman, M. (1992). The Selection of a Sampling Interval for Digitisation: How Fine is Fine Enough?. In: MacGillivray, H.T., Thomson, E.B. (eds) Digitised Optical Sky Surveys. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 174. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2472-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2472-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5091-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2472-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics