Skip to main content

Major characters and enoplan systematics

  • Conference paper
Advances in Nemertean Biology

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 89))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The history of enoplan systematics is briefly reviewed. Various taxonomic characters significant at the generic level and above are discussed, with comments on their application to traditional classifications and to recently propounded theories and new approaches to enoplan classification schemes. Several new characters are introduced and their potential significance examined. Finally, a revised classification scheme is presented which leaves open some of the phylogenetic questions about which there is presently much debate but, at the same time, provides secure higher taxa to contain the many forms and groups currently undergoing revision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berg, G., 1972. Studies on NipponnemertesFriedrich, 1968 (Nemertini, Hoplonemertini). I. Redescription of Nipponnemertes pulcher(Johnston, 1837) with special reference to intraspecific variation of the taxonomical characters. Zool. Scr., 1: 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G., 1985. Studies on NipponnemertesFriedrich (Nem-ertini, Hoplonemertini). II. Taxonomy of Nipponnemertes pulcher(Johnston) and some other species. Zool. Scr., 14: 239 - 246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, A., 1914–15. Uniporus, ein neues Genus der Familie Drepanophoridae Verrill. Bergens Mus. Aarbok, No. 6: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, A., 1917. Die pelagischen Nemertinen. Bergens Mus. Skr. ny Raek., 3, 1: 1–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, O., 1891. Nemertinen des Golfes von Neapel. Nachr. Königl. Gesellsch. Wiss. Gottingen. aus 1891: 286–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, O., 1895. Die Nemertinen des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, 22: 1–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, O., 1897–1907. Nemertini. In: Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Bd. 4, Supplement, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, 0., 1904. Nemertini. Das Tierreich, 20: 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. J. & G. A. Harrison, 1960. Phyletic weighting. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 135: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carus, J. V., 1885. Prodromus faunae Mediterraneae sive descripto annimalium maris Mediterranei incolarum quam comparata silva rerum quatenus innotuit adiectis locis et nominibus vulgaribus corumque auctoribus in commodum zoologorum. Vol. I. Coelenterata, Echinodermata, Vermes, Arthropoda. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagshandlung (E. Koch ), Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, W. R., 1901. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition. XX. The Nemerteans. Proc. Wash. acad. Sci. 3: 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, W. R., 1904. Nemerteans of the Pacific Coast of North America. Part II. Harriman Alaska ser. 11: 111–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, W. R., 1905. Nemerteans of the west and northwest coasts of America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, 47: 1–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe W. R., 1926. The pelagic nemerteans. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 49: 1–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, W. R., 1943. Biology of the nemerteans of the Atlantic coast of North America. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 35: 129–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, F. B., 1993. The genus ValdivianemertesStiasny-Wijnhoff 1923 (Nemertea, Enopla, Hoplonemertea): nomenclatural status and proper systematic position. Hydro-biologia 266: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1935. Studien zur Morphologie, Systematik und Okologie der Nemertinen der Kieler Bucht. Arch. Naturgesch., 4: 293–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1940. Einige neue Hoplonemertinen aus der Ostsee. Kieler Meeresforsch. 3: 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1955. Beitrage zu einer Synopsis der Gattungen der Nemertini monostilifera nebst Bestimmungsschlussel. Z. wiss. Zool., 158: 133–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1957. Beitrage zur kenntnis der Arktischen Hoplonemertinen. Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 119: 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1968. Sagaminemertes, eine bemerkenswerte neue Gattung der Hoplonemertinen und ihre systematische Stellung. Zool. Anz. 180: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H., 1970. Nemertinen aus Chile. Sarsia 40: 1–80. Gering, G., 1912. Neue Nemertinen der schwedischen Westkuste. Zool. Anz. 39: 520–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering, G., 1913. Neue Nemertinen der schwedischen Westkuste. Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst. 34: 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., 1972. Nemerteans. London, Hutchinson, 224 pp. Gibson, R., 1982. Nemertea. In: Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, ed. S. P. Parker, Vol. 1, pp 823–846. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., 1988. Evolutionary relationships between mono-and polystiliferous hoplonemerteans: Nipponnemertes(Cratenemertidae), a ‘missing link’ genus? Hydrobiologia 156: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., 1989. The macrobenthic nemertean fauna of Hong Kong. In: Morton, B. S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Hong Kong Univ. Press, Hong Kong Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., 1990a. Classification of the Nemertea Enopla: response to Sundberg’s critique and cladistic analysis. Zool. Scr. 19: 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., 1990b. The macrobenthic nemertean fauna of the Albany region, Western Australia. In: Proceedings of the Third International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Albany, Western Australia, eds. F. E. Wells, D. I. Walker, H. Kirkman, and R. Lethbridge, Vol. I, pp 89–194. Western Australian Museum, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. & F. B. Crandall, 1989. The genus AmphiporusEhrenberg (Nemertea, Enopla, Monostiliferoidea). Zool. Scr., 18: 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. & F. B. Crandall, 1991. Amphiporus Ehrenberg (Nemertea): Proposed designation of Planaria lact(orea Johnston, 1828 as the type species. Bull. zool. Nomenclature, 48: 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., J. Moore & F. B. Crandall, 1982. A new semi-terrestrial nemertean from California. J. Zool., Lond. 196: 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 263 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubrecht, A. A. W., 1879. The genera of European nemerteans critically revised, with description of several new species. Notes Leyden Mus. 1: 193–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, F., 1954. Some nemerteans from the coasts of the Kü Peninsula. Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab. 4: 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, F., 1960. Studies on the comparative embryology of nemerteans with special reference to their interrelationships. Publs Akkeshi mar. biol. Stn No. 10: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, F., 1972. Axial changes in the nemertean egg and embryo during development and its phylogenetic significance. J. Zool., Lond. 168: 521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, F., 1985. Foregut formation of the nemerteans and its role in nemertean systematics. Am. Zool. 25: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, A. & J. Lützen, 1988. Ultrastructure and morphological interpretation of the circulatory system of nemerteans (Phylum Rhynchocoela). Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 147: 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, G., 1827–28. Contributions to the British fauna. Zool. J. 3: 321–336, 486–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsteuer, E., 1963. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Systematik und Anatomie der adriatischen Nemertinen (Genera Tetrastemma, Oerstedia, Oerstediella). Zool. Jb. Abt. Anat. 80: 555–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsteuer, E., 1967. New marine nemerteans from Nossi Be, Madagascar. Results of the Austrian Indo-Westpacific Ex- pedition 1959/60 Part VIII. Zool. Anz. 178: 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsteuer, E., 1973. A new polystiliferous hoplonemertean, Curranemertes natansgen. et sp.n., from the Caribbean Sea (Nemertina, Polystilifera Reptantia). Zool. Scr., 2: 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsteuer, E., 1974. Description of Poseidonemertes caribensis sp. n., and discussion of other taxa of Hoplonemertini Monostilifera with divided longitudinal musculature in the body wall. Zool. Scr. 3: 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korotkevich, V. S., 1955. Pelagicheskie nemertinui dalnevostochnuikh morei SSSR. Izday. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 58: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korotkevich, V. S., 1964. Pelagic nemerteans of Antarctic and temperate waters of the southern hemisphere. Biol. Rep. Soy. Antartic Exped. 1955–58, 2: 134–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, W. C., 1873–74. A Monograph of the British Annelids. Part I, Nemerteans. London, Ray Society. 1873–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, T. H., 1897. Descriptions of new metanemerteans with notes on other species. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst. 10: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1981. The Geonemertesproblem (Nemertea). J. Zool., Lond. 194: 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1985. The evolution and comparative physiology of terrestrial and freshwater nemerteans. Biol. Rev. 60: 257–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1988a. Marine relatives of terrestrial nemerteans: the genus ProsadenoporusBürger, 1890 (Hoplonemertea). Hydrobiologia 156: 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. & R. Gibson, 1988b. Further studies on the evolution of land and freshwater nemerteans: generic relationships among the paramonostiliferous taxa. J. Zool., Lond. 216: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenburg, J., 1986. Redescription of a brooding nemertine, Cyanophthalma obscura(Schultze) gen. et Comb. n., with observations on its biology and discussion of the species of Prostomatella and related taxa. Zool. Scr. 15: 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantin, C. F. A., 1969. The genus Geonemertes. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., Zool. 18: 263–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riser, N. W., 1988. Arhynchonemertes axi gen.n., sp.n. (Nemertinea) - an insight into basic bilaterian organology. Fortschritte Zool. 36: 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riser, N. W., 1989. Speciation and time-relationships of the nemertines to the acoelomate metazoan bilateria. Bull. mar. Sci. 45: 531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, M., 1851. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Turbellarien. Greifswald, C. A. Koch, 78 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, M., 1853. Zoologische Skizzen. Z. wiss. Zool. 4: 178–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. & R. R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiasny-Wijnhoff, G., 1923. On Brinkmann’s system of the Nemertea Enopla and Siboganemertes webenn. gen. n. sp. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 67: 627–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiasny-Wijnhoff, G., 1926. The Nemertea Polystilifera of Naples. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 7: 119–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiasny-Wijnhoff, G., 1936. Die Polystilifera der Siboga expedition. Monographie XXII aus: Uitkomsten op Zoologisch, Botanisch, Oceanographisch en Geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indie 1899–1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiden, E. J. Brill. 1936. Stricker, S. A., 1985. The stylet apparatus of monostiliferous hoplonemerteans. Am. Zool. 25: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, P., 1979. Statistical analysis of variation in characters in Tetrastemma laminariae(Nemertini) with a redescription of the species. J. Zool., Lond. 189: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, P., 1990. Gibson’s reclassification of the enoplan nemerteans (Enopla, Nemertea): a critique and cladistic analysis. Zool. Scr. 19: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, P., 1991. A proposal for renaming the higher taxonomic categories in the phylum Nemertea. J. Nat. Hist. 25: 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrill, A. E., 1892. The marine nemerteans of New England and adjacent waters. Trans. Conn. acad. Arts Sci., 8: 382–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnhoff, G., 1912. Die systematik der Nemertinen. Zool. Anz. 40: 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnhoff, G., 1914. The proboscidian system in nemertines. Q. J. Microsc. Sci., 60, Part II: 273–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

R. Gibson J. Moore P. Sundberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crandall, F.B. (1993). Major characters and enoplan systematics. In: Gibson, R., Moore, J., Sundberg, P. (eds) Advances in Nemertean Biology. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 89. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2052-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2052-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4909-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2052-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics