Reason, Phenomenology, Pluralism

  • Viktor Moltschanov
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 39)


Reason and criticism of reason — this topic is widely discussed in current philosophy. But what is reason? To what extent is the task to define reason, i.e., to delineate its borders, reasonable? And in what sense is it reasonable?


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Husserl, Analysen zur passiven Synthesis/Husserliana 11 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966), p. 436.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press, 1970), p. 297.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Husserl, Analysen . . . , op. cit., p. 436.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Heidegger, Essays in Metaphysics: Identity and Differences, trans. Kurt F. Leidecker (New York: Philosophical Library Inc, 1960).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic, trans. Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969), p. 274.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., pp. 274–275.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Husserl. Logical Investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay, Vol. II (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970), p. 279.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Husserl, The Crisis . . . , op. cit., p. 294.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid., p. 289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viktor Moltschanov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations