Skip to main content

Tests of Dynamic Specification and Homogeneity in a Demand System

  • Chapter
Aggregation, Consumption and Trade

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics ((ASTA,volume 27))

Abstract

Two common findings in empirical analyses of static demand systems are a rejection of the homogeneity postulate together with significant positive serial correlation in the residuals. The thesis of this paper is that these findings reflect an inadequate dynamic specification of the demand functions. An Almost (AI) Demand System is specified which incorporates habits and durability into the utility function and is applied to British data for the period 1954–1980. A static AI model is also estimated. While the static form strongly contradicts homogeneity and symmetry and suffers from serially correlated residuals, homogeneity and symmetry are easily acceptable in the dynamic form and there is no evidence of serially correlated residuals.

The early phase of Muellbauer’s contribution to this research was supported by the E.S.R.C. under the Research Programme in Quantitative and Comparative Macroeconomics, grant number HR 6235, and more recently under grant BO0220012 for research on “The Roles of Expectational Variables and Feedback Mechanisms in Econometric Models” (with David Hendry). The Institute of Fiscal Studies supported Pashardes’s contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, G. & R. Blundell (1983): “Testing restrictions in a flexible dynamic system:An application to consumers’ expenditure in Canada,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.50, 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, C. (1985): “Homogeneity and endogeneity in demand systems,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 27, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barten, A. & E. Geyskens (1975): “The negativity condition in consumer demand,” European Economic Review, Vol. 6, 227–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R. & R. Smith (1984): “Separability, endogeneity and conditional demand models,”Mimeo, University of Manchester, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., P. Pashardes & G. Weber (1989): “What do we learn about consumer demand patterns from micro-data?” Institute for Fiscal Studies, Micro-to-Macro, Discussion Paper series No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronsard, C. & L. Salvas-Bonsard (1984), “On price endogeneity in complete demand systems,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 24, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, K. & D. Jorgenson (1979): “Testing the integrability of consumer demand functions,”European Economic Review, Vol. 12, 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. S. (1957): “A dynamic approach to the theory of consumer demand,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J., D. Hendry, F. Srba & S. Yeo (1978): “Econometric modelling of the aggregate relationship between consumers’ expenditure and income in the United Kingdom,”Economic Journal, Vol. 88, 899–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1977), “Involuntary savings through unanticipated inflation,” American Economic Review, Vol. 67, 899–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1981): “Theoretical and empirical approaches to consumer demand under rationing,” in A. S. Deaton (ed), Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behaviour in Honour of Sir Richard Stone, Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. & J. Muellbauer (1980b): “An almost ideal demand system,” American Economic Review, Vol. 70, 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (1952): “Irreversible demand functions,” Econometrica, Vol. 20, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D., L. Lau & T. Stoker (1982): “The Transendental logarithmic model of aggregate consumer behaviour,” in R. Basmann & G. Rhodes Jr. (eds.) Advances in Econometrics.Vol. 1. Greenwich, JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. (1959): “Separable utility and aggregation,” Econometrica, Vol. 27, 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. (1967): “Tastes, habits and choices,” International Economic Review, Vol. 8,218–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. (1981): “Some Engel curves,” in A. S. Deaton (ed.), op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H. S. & L. Taylor (1966, 1970 2nd ed.): Consumer Demand in the United States 1929–70, Analysis and Projections, Cambridge, Mass.; Harvard Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, N. (1984): “Microeconometric evidence on the neoclassical model of demand,” Journal of Econometrics, 25, 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen, K. (1978): “Why is demand homogeneity so often rejected?” Economic Letters,Vol. 1, 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L. (1982): “A note on the fundamental theorem of exact aggregation,” Economic Letters,Vol.9, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer, J. (1976): “Community preferences and the representative consumer,”Econometrica, Vol. 44, 979–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashardes, P. (1986): “Myopic and forward looking behaviour in a dynamic demand system,”International Economic Review, 27, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1972): “A dynamic version of the linear expenditure model,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, 450–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1978): “The demand for leisure and money,” Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1025–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1983): Applied Demand Analysis, Amsterdam and Oxford: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. & F. Spinnewyn (1982): “Rationality versus myopia in dynamic demand systems,”Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 1, 3–33, JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1970): “Habit formation and dynamic demand functions,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, 745–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1976): “Habit formation and long run utility functions,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 13, 292–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1978): “Endogenous tastes in demand and welfare analysis,” American Economic Review, Vol. 78 (papers and proc), 374–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. & R. Wales (1969): “Estimation of the linear expenditure system,” Econometrica,Vol. 37,611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, A. (1980): “Macroeconomics and reality,” Econometrica, Vol. 3, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinnewyn, F. (1979): “The cost of consumption and wealth in a model with habit formation,”Economic Letters, Vol. 2, 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinnewyn, F. (1981): “Rational habit formation,” European Economic Review, Vol. 15,92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, T. (1986): “Simple tests of distributional effects on macroeconomic equations,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, 763–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (1954): “Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: An application to the pattern of British demand,” Economic Journal, Vol. 64, 511–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. & G. Croft-Murray (1959): Social Accounting and Economic Models, London:Bowes and Bowes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. & D. Rowe (1957): “The market demand for durable goods,” Econometrica, Vol. 25,423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. & D. Rowe (1958): “Dynamic demand functions: Some econometric results,”Economic Journal, Vol. 68, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. & D. Weiserbs (1972): “On the estimation of dynamic demand functions,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, L. (1951): De invloed van de wooraden op her consumentendrag, Amsterdam:Poortpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, L. (1975): Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Weizsacker, C. C. (1971): “Notes on endogenous changes of tastes,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3, 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiserbs, D. (1983): “Dynamic demand systems with flexible functional forms,” Mimeo,Institut de Recherches Economiques, Université Catholique de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muellbauer, J., Pashardes, P. (1992). Tests of Dynamic Specification and Homogeneity in a Demand System. In: Phlips, L., Taylor, L.D. (eds) Aggregation, Consumption and Trade. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1795-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1795-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4790-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1795-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics