Abstract
The phenomenological reduction, as conceived by Husserl, is the sustained reflective revelation of the human quest for meaningfulness, the reflective investigation of the meaning of meaning, the meaning of “minding” (meinen), the “sense” (Sinn) or significance of the human activity of “meaning bestowal” (Sinngebung), understood as the “projection” of meaning upon the World in an effect to discover a transcendent Meaning “beyond” and uniting human meanings thus created. The phenomenological reduction involves the attempt to describe the necessary structures of consciousness, the attempt, that is, to investigate those structures of experience which are not merely contingent “projections”, “creations” or “inventions”. In complete consistency with this project, Viktor Frankl asserts that “the meaning of our existence is not invented by ourselves, but [is] rather detected”.1 Indeed, as Dr. Frankl points out:
... logos, or “meaning”, is not only an emergence from existence but rather something confronting existence. If the meaning that is waiting to be fulfilled by man were really nothing but a mere expression of self, or no more than a projection of his wishful thinking, it would immediately lose its demanding and challenging character; it could no longer call man forth or summon him.2
That Husserlian phenomenology is a “theory” (theoria), hence, a “vision”, of meaning and of meaningfulness, a “vision” of what it means to be “full” of meaning, is generally recognized even by those who take issue with the methodological praxis or “theoretical” results of phenomenology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
V.E. Frankl, Man’s Searchfor Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy (New York: Washington Square Press, 1970), p. 157.
Edmund Husserl, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. by W. R. Gibson (New York: Macmillan, 1931), p. 123.
As Husserl reflects: “We say, for example, of that which, in its nonsimilarity, Stands out from a homogeneous background and comes to prominence that it “strikes” us, and this means that it displays an affective tendency toward the ego”. Edmund Husserl, Experìence and Judgement: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, trans. by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks, ed. by Ludwig Landgrebe (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. 76. Again: “ what is obtrusive comes more or less close to the ego: it obtrudes on me. ... In proportion to the intensity of the obtrusiveness, what is obtrusive has greater proximity to, or remoteness from, the ego”. Ibid., p. 77.
Paul Ricoeur, “Philosophy of Will and Action”, in Erwin W. Strauss and Richard Meridith, eds., Phenomenology of Will and Action (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1967), p. 16.
Ralph Barton Perry, Realms of Value: A Critique of Human Civilization (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), pp. 2–3.
Edmund Husserl, The Phenomenology of Internat Time Consciousness, trans. by James S. Churchill, ed. by Martin Heidegger (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964), p. 126.
Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. by David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), pp. 163–164.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laycock, S.W. (1993). Meanings and Ideals: Elements of an Husserlian Axiology. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Manifestations of Reason: Life, Historicity, Culture Reason, Life, Culture Part II. Analecta Husserliana, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1677-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1677-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4733-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1677-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive