Skip to main content

Abstract

The root problem in deposit insurance today may be described as a scandal in bank and government accounting. In tough times, the valuation and itemization principles that accountants and regulators use contain reporting options that encourage large opportunity losses to be hidden from public view. They also let discretionary nonrecurring profits be recorded in ways that can overstate current profits and net worths for years on end. The rosy bias in these readings and in projections that are based upon them have much in common with the rigged scales dishonest butchers use to overcharge their clients. With a show of apparent precision, they systematically and repeatedly mismeasure the obligations deposit insurance is putting on to taxpayers’ bill.

This chapter is a revised version of a paper published by the Brookings Institution from Assessing Bank Reform, edited by Robert Litan, 1993. Reprinted with permission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Department of the Treasury, and Federal Reserve System, “Risk-Based Capital Standards: Joint Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making,” 12 C.F.R. pt. 325, 12 C.F.R. pt. 3, and 12 C.F.R. pts. 208 and 225, Washington, D.C., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTague, Jim, “2, 000 Failures? Much Media Ado Over Very Little,” The American Banker, vol. 157, October 13, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee, “The FDIC’s Proposed Schedule of Risk Sensitive Premiums,” Statement no. 83, June 1, 1992a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee, “Rule Proposed by Bank Regulators to Control Interest Rate Risk,” Statement no. 87, September 14, 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kane, E.J. (1994). Taxpayer Loss Exposure in the Bank Insurance Fund. In: Kaufman, G.G. (eds) Reforming Financial Institutions and Markets in the United States. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1404-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1404-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4616-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1404-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics