Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Product Modularity

  • Chapter
Management of Design

Abstract

Modularity arises from the division of a product into independent components. This independence allows a firm to standardize components and to create product variety. Product modularity is frequently stated as a goal of good design practice, yet has not been as carefully studied as some other current design practices such as design-for-assembly. As firms strive to rationalize their product lines and to provide ever increasing variety at lower cost, modularity is becoming a focus of attention. The goal of this paper is to define modularity, to explore some of the benefits and costs of modularity, and to propose a set of research questions. The paper is the result of preliminary research and is more a starting point than a set of refined conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, Christopher, Notes on the Synthesis of Form Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kim B. and Takahiro Fujimoto, Product Development Performance,Harvard Business School Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kim B., “The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution,” Research Policy, (14) p. 235–251,1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David H., “Modular Design— A Special Case in Nonlinear Programming,” Operations Research, Vol. 11, p. 637–647,1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel DI, John, “Managing Complexity,” The McKinsev Quarterly, Spring 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Rebecca M. and Kim B. Clark, “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, (35) p. 9–30,1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary, and John Hillkirk, Xerox: American Samurai, MacMillan Publishing, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, H., “Logistics in Manufacturing: A Way to Beat the Competition,” Assembly Automation, (7) p. 175–178,1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, James L. and Daniel E. Whitney, Concurrent Design of Products and Processes, McGraw-Hill 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Bruce and John Templeman, “Built to Last—Until it’s Time to Take it Apart,” Business Week, September 17,1990, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, Gerhard and Wolfgang Beitz (Edited by Ken Wallace), Engineering Design, The Design Council, London 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B.J. H, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, Roy and Paul Gardiner, “Robustness and Product Design Families,” in Mark Oakley (Editor), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Methods. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S. and M. Uzumeri, “Product Change and Variety: The Case of the Sony Walkman,” RPI mimeo 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftel, Tim, “A Simplex-Like Algorithm for the Continuous Modular Design Problem,” Operations Research, Vol. 25, No. 5, p. 789–807,1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaftel, Timothy L. and Gerald L. Thompson “An Integer Approach to Modular Design,” Operations Research, Vol. 19, p. 130–134,1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, Gordon V, “Models for Managing the Redesign and Manufacture of Product Sets.” Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management (3) p. 85–104, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Manufacturing Engineers Manufacturing Insights Videotape Series: Design for Manufacturing, 1990, SME P.O. Box 930, Dearborn, Michigan 48121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Nam P., The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Karen, “Modularity and Component Sharing as a Product Design and Manufacturing Strategy,” MIT Sloan School of Management, SM Thesis 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K.T. and W.P. Seering, “Function Sharing in Mechanical Design,” Design Studies (11) p. 223–234, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K.T. and W.P. Seering, “Synthesis of Schematic Descriptions in Mechanical Design,” Research in Engineering Design, (1) p. 3–18,1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, Eric, “Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable,” Research Policy. (19) p. 407–418,1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sriram Dasu Charles Eastman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ulrich, K. (1994). Fundamentals of Product Modularity. In: Dasu, S., Eastman, C. (eds) Management of Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4609-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1390-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics