Skip to main content

Abstract

The electric utility industry has entered a new era, one characterized by competition between utility-owned and independent power, by long-term movements of power from one region to another, and by the development of short-term markets in which many buyers shop for the lowest-cost power.4 The greater use of market forces, encouragement of new suppliers, and increasing reliance on economy power sales, plus recent precedents in power company mergers, have placed new demands on the electric power transmission systems throughout the world. Efficient use of the transmission system in a market context calls for changes in the institutions that govern transmission transactions. In the United States, “the most debated public policy issue involving the electric utility industry of the 1990s will likely be that of transmission access and the use of the bulk power system” (“Transmission,” 1990, p. 12).

This is an abridged version of (Hogan (1992a)). Thornton Bradshaw Professor of Public Policy and Management, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and director, Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc., Cambridge, MA. I have benefitted from repeated conversations on transmission pricing with members of the Harvard Utility Forum, colleagues and clients at Putnam, Hayes and Bartlett, and many others including Robert Arnold, Homer Brown, Douglas Bohi, Roger Bohn, Bernard Cherry, Charles Cicchetti, Ron Clark, Gordon Corey, James Cunningham, Charles Davies, Ken Fleming, Richard Flynn, Mark Friese, James Groelinger, George Gross, Kenneth Haase, George Hall, Steve Henderson, Steve Herod, Eric Hirst, Terry Howson, Robert Irwin, Joseph Keppinger, Henry Lee, William Lindsay, Cathy Mannion, David Marshall, John Macadam, James Malinowski, John Meyer, Thomas Milburn, Ray Orson, Howard Pifer, Douglas Powell, Martin Rosevear, Bart Smith, Charles Stalon, Irwin Stelzer, Donald Stock, Hodson Thornber, and Max Wilkinson. The idea of using contract networks for defining long-term rights grew out of intensive discussions with Sarah Johnson, Thomas Parkinson, Larry Ruff, and Michael Schnitzer. Support has come in part from the Harvard Utility Forum. The author is a consultant on electric transmission issues for Duquesne Light Company, the British National Grid Company, and Electricorp of New Zealand. The views presented in this chapter are not necessarily attributable to any of those mentioned, and the remaining errors are solely the responsibility of the author.

Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody doen anything about it.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, Ashley C, and Terrence L. Barnich. 1991. “Transmission and Ratebase: A Match Not Made in Heaven.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, June 1, pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, M. 1990. “Electricity Wheeling and Incentive Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2: 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 1989. The Transmission Task Force’s Report to the Commission: Electricity TransmissionRealities, Theory, and Policy Alternatives. Washington, DC: FERC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. 1990. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission: Technical Reference.” Discussion Paper E-90-17. Energy and Environmental Policy Center, Harvard University, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. 1992a. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4 (September): 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. 1992b. “An Efficient Concurrent Auction Model for Firm Natural Gas Transportation Capacity.” INFOR (Information Systems and Operational Research), 30(3) (August): 240–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P.L. 1989. “Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform, and Structural Change in the Electric Power Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (pp. 125–208). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K., J.S. Henderson, and P.A. Nagler. 1987. Some Economic Principles for Pricing Wheeled Power. NRRI-87-7. Columbus, OH: National Regulatory Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Electric Reliability Council. 1989. 1989 Reliability Assessment. Princeton, NJ: NERC, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. 1990. “Movement Towards an Efficient and Equitable Transmission Policy.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, July 19, pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, E.G. 1988. “Pricing of Transmission Services: Long-Run Aspects.” Report to Trans Power, Canterbury University, New Zealand, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, E.G., and D.P.M. Sell. 1988a. “A Framework for Transmission Pricing.” Report to Trans Power, Arthur Young, New Zealand, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, E.G., and D.P.M. Sell. 1988b. “Pricing and Operation of Transmission Services: Short-Run Aspects.” Report to Trans Power, Canterbury University and Arthur Young. New Zealand, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueger, G. 1990. “The FERC’s Transmission Task Force Report: Where Do We Go from Here?” Public Utilities Fortnightly, February 1, pp. 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R., and B. Golub. 1984. “Estimating Effective Concentration in Deregulated Wholesale Electricity Markets.” Rand Journal of Economics, 15(1) (Spring): 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F.C., M.C. Caramanis, R.D. Tabors, and R.E. Bohn. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Transmission: A Continuing Controversy.” 1990. Public Utilities Fortnightly, July 19, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Mas. 1989. “Power Monopolies and the Challenge of the Market: American Theory and British Practice.” Discussion Paper E-89-12, Energy and Environmental Policy Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorpette, G. 1989. “Moving Power Through the Northeast Corridor.” IEEE Spectrum (August): 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hogan, W.W. (1994). Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission. In: Einhorn, M.A. (eds) From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics