Skip to main content

Regional Transmission Groups: How Should They be Structured and What Should They do?

  • Chapter
From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets

Abstract

Electricity transmission raises numerous challenges of combining cooperation and competition in a coherent institutional structure. It is widely recognized that existing forms of cooperative activity are not sufficiently tuned to the rising competitive forces in the wholesale electricity market. These competitive forces motivated the transmission access provisions of the 1992 Energy Policy Act. Sorting out the details of the new access regime could entail costly and extensive litigation. As an alternative to litigation, some form of voluntary negotiated activity among industry participants may be a more efficient approach. Those interested in pursuing such a negotiation framework have focused on a notion known as a regional transmission group (RTG) as a new way of addressing the issues of common interest in electricity transmission in a regime of broader access. While there is widespread perception that new forms of cooperation are desirable, there is much less consensus on the detailed structure that such institutions should take. This chapter examines these questions with particular emphasis on the transmission capacity expansion problem. While this problem would not be the exclusive focus of an RTG, it raises questions that have not been well handled even by reform proposals addressing access issues involving only existing assets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alger, D., and M. Toman. 1990. “Market-Based Regulation of Natural Gas Pipelines.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(3): 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, R., and E. Kahn. 1992. “Transmission Planning in the Era of Integrated Resource Planning: A Survey of Recent Cases.” LBL-32231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, R., and E. Kahn. 1993. “Network Costs and the Regulation of Wholesale Competition in Electricity.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 5(4): 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, T. 1993. “MAPP MW-Mile Method: ‘The Devils Are in the Details.’ ” Paper presented at the TAPS Conference on Distance Based Transmission Pricing Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, R., R. Gutman, and P. Marchenko. 1979. “Analytical Development of Loadability Characteristics for EHV and UHV Transmission Lines.” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-98: 606–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, M. 1990. “Electricity Wheeling and Incentive Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(2): 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • “What They Said About Regional Transmission Groups.” 1993. Electricity Journal, 6(2): 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 1992. Order No. 636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, R. 1992. “Transmission Access and Pricing: What Does a Good ‘Open Access’ System Look Like?” NERA Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., E. Kahn, and M. White. 1993. “The Efficiency of Market Coordination: Evidence from Wholesale Electric Power Pools.” University of California Energy Institute Working Paper, PWP-012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. 1992. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4(3): 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P. 1992. “Supply Procurement for Uncertain Future Demand Under Regulation.” Rutgers University Advanced Workshop on Regulation and Public Utility Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E. 1993. “Regulation by Simulation: The Role of Production Cost Models in Electricity Planning and Pricing.” University of California Energy Institute Working Paper, PWP-014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E., and R. Gilbert. 1993. Competition and Institutional Change in U.S. Electric Power Regulation, University of California Energy Institute Working Paper, PWP-011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, R., and A. Leverett. In press. “A Load Flow Based Method for Calculating Embedded, Incremental and Marginal Cost of Transmission Capacity.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F., and Q. Feng. 1992. “Multi-Area Unit Commitment.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 7(2): 591–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistr, A. 1992. “A Proposal for Fundamental Reform of Transmission Pricing.” Virginia Power.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC). 1991. “Report on the Management and Operations Audit of the New York Power Pool.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Northeast Utilities. 1993. “Agreement with Respect to Regional Transmission Arrangement for the New England Power Pool.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Electricity Regulation (OFFER). 1992. “Report on Constrained-On Plant.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmero, P. 1991. “Institutional Issues Regarding Centralized Dispatch.” Appendix A in Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW), Advance Plan 6 Centralized Dispatch Study: Report (D26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, C. 1993. Regulating Power: The Economics of Electricity in the Information Age. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW). 1991a. “Advance Plan 6 Interface Study: Transmission Report (D23s).”

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW). 1991b. “Advance Plan 6 Interface Study: Resource Related Benefits of Increased Interface Transmission Capability (D22c).”

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F., M. Caramanis, R. Tabors, and R. Bohn. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern California Edison (SCE). 1992. “Draft Transmission Cost Tables.” Revised October 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern California Edison (SCE). 1993. “Transmission Cost Tables.” August 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutley, N. 1993. “Capacity Planning and Regional Transmission Groups.” Paper presented at the Wheeling and Dealing Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, B., and S. Henderson. 1991. “Market-Based Pricing of Wholesale Electric Services.” Electricity Journal, 4(10): 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Association for Transmission Systems Coordination (WATSCO). 1993. “Draft Bylaws.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC). 1993. “A Process for Regional Planning in the WSCC Region.” WSCC Regional Planning Policy Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Regional Transmission Group (WRTG). 1993. “Draft Bylaws.” September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kahn, E. (1994). Regional Transmission Groups: How Should They be Structured and What Should They do?. In: Einhorn, M.A. (eds) From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics