Skip to main content

A Conceptual Regulatory Framework of Transmission Access in Multiutility Electric Power Systems

  • Chapter
From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

There is an ample consensus about the existence of significant economies of scale in the coordination (which does not necessarily imply centralization) of the operation and capacity expansion planning of electric power systems. It is believed that, in order to capture all the coordination-related economies of scale, very large systems have to be considered. A figure of several tens of gigawatts (GW) of installed generating capacity has been mentioned as the minimum size that is needed to exhaust these economies (see Joskow and Schmalensee, 1983). Recent studies within the context of the European Union (EU) internal market for electricity seem to indicate that much larger systems may still benefit from coordination practices. These systems will typically encompass several utilities and, in most cases, they may also involve a number of different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, A.M., L.L. Garver, J.N. Maughn, P.J. Palermo, and W.L. Stillinger. 1991. “Summary of Panel: Long-Term Impact of Third-Party Transmission Use.” Paper presenteda at the IEEE 1991 PES Winter Meeting, paper 91 WM 007-5 PWRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D.R. 1991. “Inter-Utility Communications Within WSCC.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6(4) (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. 1988. “Competition, Marginal Cost Tariffs and Spot Pricing in the Chilean Electric Power Sector.” Energy Policy (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramanis, M.R.E. Bohn, and F.C. Schweppe. 1982. “Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory.” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-101, no. 9 (September).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission des CommunautĂ©s EuropĂ©ennes. 1991. “Rapports des ComitĂ©s Consultatifs sur l’Accès de Tiers aux RĂ©seaux Electriques.” Direction General de l’Energie (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conejo, A., M. Rivier, and I.J. PĂ©rez-Arriaga. 1992. “Application of the Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition to Decentralized Optimal Dispatch of Interconnected Electric Power Systems.” Paper presented at the 20th ReuniĂłn Nacional de EstadĂ­stica e InvestigaciĂłn Operativa, September (in Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Current Operational Problems Working Group. 1991. “Operating Problems with Parallel Flows.” IEEE Committee Report, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6(3): 1024–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edison Electric Institute. 1986. “The Vital Link: Electric Transmission and the Public Interest.”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W.W. 1990. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” 1990. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P.L., and R. Schmalensee. 1983. Markets for Power. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. 1992. “Network Security: System Exchanges EMS Information.” Electrical World (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivier, M., and I.J. PĂ©rez-Arriaga. 1993. “Computation and Decomposition of Spot Prices for Transmission Pricing.” Paper presented at the 11th Power Systems Computation Conference, Avignon, France, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivier, M., I.J. PĂ©rez-Arriaga, and J. Luengo. 1990. “JUANAC: A Model for Computation of Spot Prices in Interconnected Power Systems.” Paper presented at the 10th PSCC Conference, Graz, Austria, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F.C. 1988a. “Mandatory Wheeling: A Framework for Discussion.” Paper presented at the IEEE 1988 PES Summer Power Meeting, paper 88 SM 690–0, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F.C. 1988b. “A Spot Price Based Transmission Marketplace.” Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F.C, M. Caramanis, R.D. Tabors, and R.E. Bohn. 1988. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

PĂ©rez-Arriaga, I.J. (1994). A Conceptual Regulatory Framework of Transmission Access in Multiutility Electric Power Systems. In: Einhorn, M.A. (eds) From Regulation to Competition: New frontiers in electricity markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1368-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics