Abstract
Somatic cells can undergo mitotically transmitted changes in state that do not result from permanent changes in genetic constitution. These alterations in cellular heredity are called epigenetic changes to emphasize their role in the somatic transmission of developmental (i.e. epigenetic) information and to distinguish them from rare, spontaneous mutations (Nanney 1958). Epigenetic changes are defined operationally as directed cell-heritable, phenotypic changes that are potentially reversible and not transmitted meiotically (Meins 1980& Lutz 1980). It is likely that the earlier distinction made between mitotic and meiotic transmission, particularly in plants, is artificial. Forms of heritable variation such as paramutation (Brink 1973), phases of transposable-element activity (Fedoroff et al. 1989), and genomic imprinting (Surani 1991) have the properties typical of epigenetic changes, but are inherited both mitotically and meiotically. More recently, Holliday (1987) coined the term epimutation to denote heritable variation resulting from modifications of DNA due to methylation of cytosines. Jorgensen (1993) has suggested applying this term more broadly to meiotically transmitted states with a developmental basis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boller T (1985) Induction of hydrolases as a defense reaction against pathogens. UCLA Symp Mol Cell Biol N S 22: 247–262.
Brink RA (1973) Paramutation. Ann Rev Genet 7: 129–152.
de Carvalho F, Gheysen G, Kushnir S, van Montagu M, Inzé D & Castresana C (1992) Suppression of β-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. EMBO J 11: 2595–2602.
Delbrück M (1949) Discussion following the paper by TM Sonneborn and GH Beale. Colloq Int Centre Nat Recherche Sci, Paris 7: 25.
Elkind Y, Edwards R, Mavandad M, Hedrick S, Ribak O, Dixon RA & Lamb CJ (1990) Abnormal plant development and down-regulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in transgenic tobacco containing a heterologous phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 9057–9061.
Fedoroff N, Masson P & Banks J-A (1989) Mutations, epimutations, and the developmental programming of the maize suppressor-mutator transposable element. BioEssays 10: 139–144.
Goring DR, Thomson L & Rothstein SJ (1991) Transformation of a partial nopaline synthase gene into tobacco suppresses the expression of a resident wild-type gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1770–1774.
Grierson D, Fray RG, Hamilton AJ, Smith CJS & Watson CF (1991) Does co-suppression of sense genes in transgenic plants involve antisense RNA? TIBTECH 9: 122–123.
Hart CM, Fischer B, Neuhaus J-M & Meins F Jr (1992) Regulated inactivation of homologous gene expression in transgenic Nicotiana sylvestris plants containing a defense-related tobacco chitinase gene. Mol Gen Genet 235: 179–188.
Holliday R (1987) The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science 238: 163–170.
Jablonka E, Lachmann M & Lamb MJ (1992) Evidence, mechanisms and models for the inheritance of acquired characters. J Theor Biol 158: 245–268.
Jorgensen R (1990) Altered gene expression in plants due to trans interactions between homologous genes. TIBTECH 8: 340–344.
Jorgensen R (1991) Beyond antisense — How do transgenes interact with homologous plant genes? TIBTECH 9: 266–267.
Jorgensen R (1992) Silencing of plant genes by homologous transgenes. AgBiotech News Info 4: 265N-273N.
Jorgensen R (1993) The germinal inheritance of epigenetic information in plants. Phil Trans R Soc London B 339: 173–181.
Linn F, Heidmann I, Saedler H & Meyer P (1990) Epigenetic changes in the expression of the maize A1 gene in Petunia hybrida: role of numbers of integrated gene copies and state of methylation. Molec Gen Genet 222: 329–336.
Matzke M & Matzke AJM (1993) Genomic imprinting in plants: parental effects and trans-inactivation phenomena. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44: 53–76.
Matzke MA, Primig M, Trnovsky J & Matzke AJM (1989) Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J 8: 643–649.
Meins F Jr (1983) Heritable variation in plant cell culture. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 34: 327–346.
Meins F Jr (1989) A biochemical switch model for cell-heritable variation in cytokinin requirement. In: Goldberg R (ed) Molecular Basis of Plant Development (pp 13–24). Alan R. Liss, New York.
Meins F Jr & Binns AN (1978) Epigenetic clonal variation in the requirement of plant cells for cytokinins. In: Subtelny S & Sussex IM (eds) The Clonal Basis for Development (pp 185–201). Academic Press, New York.
Meins F Jr & Binns AN (1979) Cell determination in plant development. Bioscience 29: 221–225.
Meins F Jr & Lutz J (1980) Epigenetic changes in tobacco cell culture. In: Rubenstein I et al. (eds) Emergent Techniques for the Improvement of Crops (pp 220–236). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Meins F Jr, Neuhaus J-M, Sperisen C & Ryals J (1992) The primary structure of plant pathogenesis-related glucanohydrolases and their genes. In: Boller T & Meins F Jr (eds) Genes Involved in Plant Defense (pp 245–282). Springer Verlag, Vienna/New York.
Meyer P, Linn F, Heidmann I, Meyer zAH, Niedenhof I & Saedler H (1992) Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of a maize Al gene construct in transgenic petunia and its colour phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 231: 345–352.
Mittelsten Scheid O, Paszkowski J & Potrykus I (1991) Reversible inactivation of a transgene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molec Gen Genet 228: 104–112.
Mol J, van Blokland R & Kooter J (1991) More about co-suppression. TIBTECH 9: 182–183.
Monod J & Jacob F (1961) General conclusions: telenomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 26: 389–401.
Nanney DL (1958) Epigenetic control systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44: 712–717.
Napoli C, Lemieux C & Jorgensen R (1990) Induction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2: 279–289.
Neuhaus J-M, Ahl-Goy P, Hinz U, Flores S & Meins F Jr (1991a) High-level expression of a tobacco chitinase gene in Nicotiana sylvestris. Susceptibility of transgenic plants to Cercospora nicotianae infection. Plant Molec Biol 16: 141–151.
Neuhaus J-M, Sticher L, Meins F Jr & Boiler T (1991b) A short C-terminal sequence necessary and sufficient for the targeting of chitinases to the plant vacuole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10362–10366.
Shinshi H, Mohnen D & Meins F Jr (1987) Regulation of a plant pathogenesis-related enzyme: inhibition of chitinase and chitinase mRNA accumulation in cultured tobacco tissues by auxin and cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 89–93.
Shinshi H, Neuhaus J-M, Ryals J & Meins F Jr (1990) Structure of a tobacco endochitinase gene: evidence that different chitinases genes can arise by transposition of sequences encoding a cysteine-rich domain. Plant Molec Biol 14: 357–368.
Smith CJS, Watson CF, Bird CR, Ray J, Schuch W & Grierson D (1990) Expression of a a truncated tomato polygalacturonase gene inhibits expression of the endogenous gene in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 224: 477–481.
Sperisen C, Ryals J & Meins F Jr (1991) Comparison of cloned genes provides evidence for intergenomic exchange of DNA in the evolution of a tobacco glucan endo-1,3-β-glucosidase gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1820–1824.
Sticher L, Hofsteenge J, Milani A, Neuhaus J-M & Meins F Jr (1992) Vacuolar chitinases of tobacco: a new class of hydroxyproline-containing proteins. Science 257: 655–657.
Surani MA (1991) Genomic imprinting: developmental significance and molecular mechanisms. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1: 141–246.
van Buuren M, Neuhaus J-M, Shinshi H, Ryals J & Meins F Jr (1992) The structure and regulation of homeologous tobacco endochitinase genes of Nicotiana sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis origin. Mol Gen Genet 232: 460–469.
van der Krol AR, Mur LA, Beld M, Mol JNM & Stuitje AR (1990) Flavonoid genes in Petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a supression of gene expression. Plant Cell 2: 291–299.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meins, F., Kunz, C. (1994). Silencing of Chitinase Expression in Transgenic Plants: An Autoregulatory Model. In: Paszkowski, J. (eds) Homologous Recombination and Gene Silencing in Plants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1094-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1094-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4478-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1094-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive