Abstract
This review of attempts to prioritize national energy technology R&D investments suggests a model for an ideal approach. It involves estimating the energy significance of R&D success as well as the economic, environmental, and energy security improvements which can result for each of a very broad range of energy technologies and technology areas. Also, the possible cost and time scale of R&D should be estimated as well as its risk and the need for government support or stimulation. The portfolio should be assessed against scenarios of future possible circumstances both good and bad. A second step should be to assess the importance of basic or cross-cutting research.
None of the past attempts at R&D prioritization reviewed in this paper were successful in performing all of these steps particularly, the last one. It is perhaps naive to believe the ideal model will even be achieved, but recent advances in interactive Personal Computer software and hardware can improve the results and the understanding of results by groups of experts and decision makers as well.
Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-ACO5-840R21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fulkerson, W., S. I. Auerbach, A. T. Crane, D. E. Kash, A. M. Perry, and D. B. Reister. Energy Technology R&D: What Could Make a Difference? ORNL-6541/V1, ORNL-6541/V2/P1, ORNL-6541/V2IP2, ORNL-6541/V2/P3. 1989.
National Energy Strategy. Washington, D.C., February 1991. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. First Edition 199 1/1992.
Ray, D. L. “The Nation’s Energy Future,” WASH-1281, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. December 1973.
U.K. DOE (United Kingdom, Department of Energy). Energy Technologies for the United Kingdom: 1986 Appraisal of Research, Development and Demonstration, Energy Paper 54, February 1987; and Background Papers Relevant to the 1986 Appraisal of U.K. Energy Research, Development and Demonstration, ETSU-R-43; reports compiled by Chief Scientist Group, Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell Laboratory. 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fulkerson, W. (1994). Energy Technology R&D Investment Analysis. In: de Almeida, A.T., Rosenfeld, A.H., Roturier, J., Norgard, J. (eds) Integrated Electricity Resource Planning. NATO ASI Series, vol 261. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1054-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1054-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4458-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1054-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive