Skip to main content

Energy Technology R&D Investment Analysis

  • Chapter
Integrated Electricity Resource Planning

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 261))

Abstract

This review of attempts to prioritize national energy technology R&D investments suggests a model for an ideal approach. It involves estimating the energy significance of R&D success as well as the economic, environmental, and energy security improvements which can result for each of a very broad range of energy technologies and technology areas. Also, the possible cost and time scale of R&D should be estimated as well as its risk and the need for government support or stimulation. The portfolio should be assessed against scenarios of future possible circumstances both good and bad. A second step should be to assess the importance of basic or cross-cutting research.

None of the past attempts at R&D prioritization reviewed in this paper were successful in performing all of these steps particularly, the last one. It is perhaps naive to believe the ideal model will even be achieved, but recent advances in interactive Personal Computer software and hardware can improve the results and the understanding of results by groups of experts and decision makers as well.

Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-ACO5-840R21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fulkerson, W., S. I. Auerbach, A. T. Crane, D. E. Kash, A. M. Perry, and D. B. Reister. Energy Technology R&D: What Could Make a Difference? ORNL-6541/V1, ORNL-6541/V2/P1, ORNL-6541/V2IP2, ORNL-6541/V2/P3. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Energy Strategy. Washington, D.C., February 1991. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. First Edition 199 1/1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ray, D. L. “The Nation’s Energy Future,” WASH-1281, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. December 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.K. DOE (United Kingdom, Department of Energy). Energy Technologies for the United Kingdom: 1986 Appraisal of Research, Development and Demonstration, Energy Paper 54, February 1987; and Background Papers Relevant to the 1986 Appraisal of U.K. Energy Research, Development and Demonstration, ETSU-R-43; reports compiled by Chief Scientist Group, Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell Laboratory. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulkerson, W. (1994). Energy Technology R&D Investment Analysis. In: de Almeida, A.T., Rosenfeld, A.H., Roturier, J., Norgard, J. (eds) Integrated Electricity Resource Planning. NATO ASI Series, vol 261. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1054-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1054-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4458-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1054-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics