Cardinalism pp 289-306 | Cite as

The Fundamental Cardinalist Approach and Its Prospects

Part of the Theory and Decision Library book series (TDLA, volume 19)


I would like to stress two very essential points on the cardinalist approach.


Cash Holding Positive Theory American School Economic Science Cardinal Utility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allais, Maurice (1943) A la Recherche d’une Discipline Economique (To the Search for an Economic Discipline), Paris, 1943; republished as Traité d’Economie Pure (Treatise on Pure Economics), 1952; third edition as Traité d’Economie Pure. Editions Clément Juglar, Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Allais, Maurice (1952a) ‘Fondements d’une théorie positive des choix comportant un risque et critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine’ (Foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk, and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School), Econométrie, Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Vol. XL, Paris, 1953, pp. 257-332. (See also pp. 34-35, 37-39, 40, 47-48, 151-163, 194-197 and 245-247.) This memoir was republished in Vol. 144 of the Annales des Mines, special issue, 1955, and again as a separate volume, under the same title by the Imprimerie Nationale 1955.Google Scholar
  3. Allais, Maurice (1952b) ‘Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine’ (The behavior of rational man facing risk: Criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School) in Econometrica, 21(4), October 1953, pp. 503–546 (summarised version of the 1952 Memoir).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allais, Maurice (1952c) ‘La psychologie de l’homme rationnel devant le risque — La théorie et l’expérience’, Journal de la Société de Statistique de Paris, January–March 1953, pp. 47-73.Google Scholar
  5. Allais, Maurice (1976) The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School, English translation of the (1952) Memoir, in Allais and Hagen, 1979, pp. 27-145.Google Scholar
  6. Allais, Maurice (1977) ‘The so-called Allais’ paradox and rational decisions under uncertainty’, in Allais and Hagen, 1979, pp. 437-699.Google Scholar
  7. Allais, Maurice (1983) ‘The foundations of the theory of utility and risk; some central points of the discussions at the Oslo Conference’, in Hagen and Wenstop (Eds.), Progress in Decision Theory, Reidel, 1984, pp. 3-131.Google Scholar
  8. Allais, Maurice (1984), ‘The cardinal utility and its determination, hypothesis, methods and empirical results’, Theory and Decision, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  9. Allais, Maurice and Hagen, Ole (1979) Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais’ Paradox; Contemporary Discussions and Rational Decisions under Uncertainty with Allais’ Rejoinder, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, p. 715.Google Scholar
  10. Pieron, Henri (1927) Psychologie Expérimentale, A. Colin, Paris, p. 220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations