Skip to main content

Medical technology assessment and reimbursement policy of implantable devices in Belgium: possibilities and limitations for the future

  • Chapter
Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

The Belgian health care system is based on a mixture of public and private initiatives. It is financed by social contributions proportional to income (70%) and by state subsidies (30%) in a Bismarck model of national solidarity and compulsory health insurance covering the whole of the 10 million population. The administration of the system is exclusively assigned to five recognized sickness funds, and its policy-making structure is built on an advisory and consensus mechanism between government officials, health insurers, and interest groups of providers and institutions. In order to coordinate and supervise a uniform application of insurance cover by the sickness funds a National Institute of Health and Disability Insurance (R.I.Z.I.V.) was created in 1963. Health care delivery is paid through the reimbursement of a per diem price for the hospital and of a fee-for-service for the provider. It is obvious that this output-financed health care system in Belgium has led to an increase of services offered and a generalized purchase of the latest and most expensive technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fogoros RN, Fiedler SB, Elson JJ. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in drug-refractory ventricular tachy-arrhythmias. Ann Int Med 1987; 107: 635–641.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tchou PJ, Kadri N, Andersen J, Caceres JA, Jazayeri M, Akthar M. Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator and survival of patients with left ventricular dysfunction and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Ann Int Med 1988; 109: 529–534.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder AM et al. Longterm outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 1353–1361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van den Oever R. Arrhythmia technology. The insurer’s point of view. In: Andries E, Brugada P, Stroobandt R, editors. How to face ‘the faces’ of cardiac pacing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992: 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brugada P, Van Royen M, Andries E, van den Oever R. The Belgian system to control indications for the implantable defibrillator: a model for other European countries?. Eur J Med 1993; 2: 86–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. OECD. The reform of health care: a comparative analysis of seven countries. Health Policy Studies no. 2. OECD, Paris, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saksena S, Camm AJ. Implantable defibrillators for prevention of sudden death. Technology at a medical and economic crossroad. Circulation 1992; 85: 2316–2321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saksena S. The social and economic impact of the new implantable cardioverter defibrillator technology. In: Alt E, Klein H, Griffin JC, editors. The implantable cardioverter/defibrill-ator. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 293–299.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen GC, Manolis AS, Sonnenberg FA, Deskanski JR, Mark Estes NA, Pauker SG. Cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Effect of improved battery life and comparison with amiodarone therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1323–1334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien BJ, Buxton MJ, Rushby JA. Cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a preliminary analysis. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 241–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidbüchel H, Ector H. Cost-benefit analysis of arrhythmia technology. In: Andries E, Brugada P, Stroobandt R, editors. How to face ‘the faces’ of cardiac pacing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992: 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hauer RNW, Wever EFD, Cryns HJGM. Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: cost effectiveness. Pace 1993; 16: 559–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeevanandam V, Bielefeld MR, Auteri JS et al. The implantable defibrillator: an electronic bridge to cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1992; 86(11): 276–279.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kottke TE, Stanton MS, Bailey KR, Decker WW, Hammill SC. A population-based estimate of candidacy rates for the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 77–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Den Oever, R. (1994). Medical technology assessment and reimbursement policy of implantable devices in Belgium: possibilities and limitations for the future. In: Aubert, A.E., Ector, H., Stroobandt, R. (eds) Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0872-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0872-0_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4377-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0872-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics