Abstract
The introduction of Holter monitoring almost 30 years ago was a major advance with respect to arrhythmia diagnosis and management, permitting medical personnel to identify transient arrhythmias, correlate symptoms with a multiplicity of rhythm disorders, and assess the effectiveness of any therapeutic interventions. Holter studies have also been used to evaluate pacing system function, often identifying a multiplicity of abnormalities, commonly transient and commonly not associated with symptoms. Thus, some physicians have recommended that Holter studies should be a routine component of a pacing system evaluation [1–4]. The Holter study commonly provides a variety of different formats for the same data. An individual study may comprise a continuous display of the rhythm at a compressed format, often showing 1 h of rhythm on a single page, an expansion of the rhythm for symptomatic events, counts of the number of ectopic beats which may be further separated by morphology and rhythm sequences, as well as heart rate trends. For all the elegance of the current Holter recordings, knowledgeable personnel need to review the final result and often relabel individual complexes which are misinterpreted by the automatic recognition algorithms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Famularo MA, Kennedy HL. Ambulatory electrocardiography in the assessment of pacemaker function. Am Heart J 1982: 104: 1086–94.
Janosik DL, Redd RM, Buckingham TA et al. Utility of ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting pacemaker dysfunction in the early postimplantation period. Am J Cardiol 1987: 60: 1030–1035.
Ursell S, El-Sherif N. Electrocardiography of single chamber pacemakers. Value of Holter monitoring for follow-up of pacemaker patients. In: Saksena S, Goldschalger N, editors. Electrical Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990: 220–204.
Van Gelder LM, Bracke FALE, El Gamal MIH. Fusion or confusion on Holter recording. PACE 1991: 14: 760–763.
Kruse I, Markowitz T, Ryden L. Timing markers showing pacemaker behavior to aid in the follow-up of a physiologic pacemaker. PACE 1983: 6: 801–805.
Olson W, McConnell M, Sah R et al. Pacemaker diagnostic diagrams. PACE 1985; 8: 691–700.
Levine PA, Schüller H, Lindgren A. Pacemaker ECG. Utilization of pulse generator telemetry. Solna, Sweden: Siemens Elema AB, 1988.
Levine PA, Sholder J, Duncan JL. Clinical benefits of telemetered electrograms in the assessment of DDD function. PACE 1984; 7: 1170–1177.
Clarke M, Allen A. Use of telemetered electrograms in the assessment of normal pacemaker function. J Electrophysiol 1987; 1: 388–395.
Sarmiento JJ. Clinical utility of telemetered intracardiac electrograms in diagnosing a design dependent lead malfunction. PACE 1990; 13: 188–95.
Luceri RM, Castellanos A, Thurer RJ. Telemetry of intracardiac electrograms; Applications in spontaneous and induced arrhythmias. J Electrophysiol 1987; 1: 417–424.
Levine PA. The complementary role of electrogram, event marker and measured data telemetry in the assessment of pacing system function. J Electrophysiol 1987; 1: 404–416.
Stangl K, Wirtzfeld A, Sichart U et al. The combined use of hysteresis and Holter functions improves diagnosis and therapy in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1988; 11: 1698–1702.
Sanders R, Martin R, Frumin H et al,. Data storage and retrieval by implantable pacemakers for diagnostic purposes. PACE 1984; 7: 1228–1233.
Levine PA, Lindenberg BS. Diagnostic data: An aid to the follow-up and assessment of the pacing system. J Electrophysiol 1987; 1: 396–403.
Levine PA. Utility and clinical benefits of extensive event counter telemetry in the follow-up and management of the rate-modulated pacemaker patient. Sylmar, CA: Siemens Pacesetter, 1992.
Hayes DL, Higano ST, Eisinger G. Utility of rate histograms in programming and follow-up of a DDDR pacemaker. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 495–502.
Levine PA, Sholder JA, Florio J. Obtaining maximal benefit from a DDDR pacing system: A reliable yet simple method for programming the sensor parameters of Synchrony. Sylmar, CA: Siemens Pacesetter, 1990.
Newman D, Dorian P, Downar E et al. Use of telemetry functions in the assessment of implanted antitachycardia device efficiency. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 616–621.
Wang PJ, Mandalakas N, Clyne C et al,. Accuracy of rhythm classification using a data log system in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE 1991; 14: 1911–1916.
Luceri RM, Puchferran RL, Brownstein SL et al. Improved patient surveillance and data acquisition with a third generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator. PACE 1991; 14: 1870–1874.
Hurwitz JL, Hook BG, Flores BT, Marchlinski FE. Importance of abortive shock capability with electrogram storage in cardioverter-defibrillator devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 895–900.
Almeida HF, Buckingham TA. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks secondary to sensing lead failure: Utility of stored electrograms. PACE 1993; 116: 407–4011.
Leitch J, Klein G, Yee R et al. Feasibility of an implantable arrhythmia monitor. PACE 1992; 15: 2232–2235.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levine, P.A. (1994). Holter and pacemaker diagnostics. In: Aubert, A.E., Ector, H., Stroobandt, R. (eds) Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0872-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0872-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4377-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0872-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive