Skip to main content

Science and God: The Topology of the Kantian World

  • Chapter
Kant and Contemporary Epistemology

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 54))

  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

Kant is known as the great mediator between opposing scientific and philosophical systems; for instance, between the Cartesians and the Leibnizians in respect of the competing notions of momentum and energy; or again, between the empiricist and rationalist tradition of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In a very similar way we find Kant attempting to mediate between sceptical and religious positions. On the one hand, he seeks to show that the traditional arguments for the existence of God, the ontological, cosmological and physico-theological proofs, cannot be sustained.Yeton the other hand, we find him simultaneously defending the language and accompanying convictions of religious consciousness. Nor is this a purely ‘linguistic’ matter, as the reference to language might suggest. On the contrary, the imagery of a God whose purposes work themselves out in the context of the order of nature as well as of morality is for Kant an essential element through which reality is to be defined, emerging under the sovereign command of reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. LeibnizPhilosophical Papers and Letters, 2 vols., trans. and ed. L.E. Loemker, (Chicago, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For an account of the ‘reduction-realization’ approach see the author’sKant and the Dynamics of Reason(Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, U.S.A.), 1992, ch. 3, ‘Reduction-Realization: A Key to the Structure of Kant’s Thought’, pp. 53–103, and ch. 4, ‘Realism and Realization in a Kantian Light’, pp. 104–34. For a general account of Kant’s philosophy, see myMetaphysics and the Philosophy of Science(Blackwell, Oxford, 1969; University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1988), ch. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For Husserl, cf. hisDie Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologieed. W. Biemel (Martinus Nijhoff, 1962), especially paras. 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ak. ed., I, 385–416. Trans. in F.E. EnglandKant’s Conception of God(London, Unwin, 1929), pp. 212–52. See also the translation of NDby John Reuscher in Kant’s Latin Writings, ed. L.W. Beck, (New York/Bern/Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1986), pp. 57–109.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘A’ and ‘b’ respectively denote the First and Second editions of Kant’sCritique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (Macmillan, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the connection between ‘causality’ and ‘empirical sequence’ cf. also my ‘Causality, Causal Laws and Scientific Theory in the Philosophy of Kant’, inThe British Journal for the Philosophy of ScienceXVI No. 63 (1965), 187–208; and Note 3 above, ch. 9, ‘The Kantian “Dynamic of Reason”, with special reference to the Place of Causality in Kant’s system’, pp. 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. alsoCPrR, p. 44, trans. Lewis White Beck (Bobbs-Merrill, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  9. My own translation. Note that where Kant says: “I could not realize this thought [Ich konnte diesen Gedanken nicht realisieren]”, Beck translates: “I could not give content to this supposition” (Beck translation p. 50)—evidence that philosophical positions can influence an author’s translation!

    Google Scholar 

  10. I have also used the translation by J.H. Bernard (Hafner, New York, 1951), p. 33, though with modifications.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “ This essay has also been published in Vol. xxx, SupplementThe Southern Journal of Philosophy, 1991, Memphis State University: ‘System and Teleology in Kant’s Critique of Judgement, and it forms ch. 14 of the author’s Kant and the Dynamics of Reason: Essays on the Structure of Kant ‘s Philosophy(Blackwell, Oxford, UK & Cambridge U.S.A., 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buchdahl, G. (1994). Science and God: The Topology of the Kantian World. In: Parrini, P. (eds) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0834-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0834-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4359-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0834-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics