Advertisement

Strategic Management Simulations: the German Case

  • Klaus Breuer
  • Siegfried Streufert
Chapter
Part of the Evaluation in Education and Human Services book series (EEHS, volume 43)

Abstract

This chapter initially considers the rationale and potential value of games and simulations for managerial and executive assessment. Several shortcomings of existing techniques are discussed. In contrast, characteristics of the Strategic Management Simulations (SMS) are described in terms of applicability, reliability, construct validity, predictive validity and other factors. This chapter provides validity information about a German version of the SMS system via a case analysis procedure with two German samples.

Keywords

Basic Sample Corporate Training Cognitive Complexity Informative Message Simulation Participant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breuer, K. (1990). Lernen mit computersimulierten komplexen dynamischen Systemen. Lechner, E. and Zielinski, J. (Eds.) Wirkungssysteme und Reformansätze in der Pädagogik. Frankfurt: Lang, 341–351.Google Scholar
  2. Breuer, K. and Kummer, R. (1990). Cognitive effects from process learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breuer K. and Günterberg, A. (1991). Firma: Die betriebswirtschaftliche Simulation eines Produktionsbetriebs. Duisburg: CoMet.Google Scholar
  4. Dörner, D. and Reither, F. (1978). Über das Problemlösen in sehr komplexen Realitätsbereichen. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 25, 527–551.Google Scholar
  5. Dörner D., Kreuzig, H.W., Reither, F. and Stäudel, T. (Eds.) (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  6. Fromkin, H.L. and Streufert, S. (1976). Laboratory Experimentation. Dunnette, M. (Ed.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 415–465.Google Scholar
  7. Funke, U. (1991). Die Validierung einer computergestützten Systemsimulation zur Diagnose von Problemlösekompetenz. Schuler, H. and Funke, U. (Eds.) Eignungsdiagnostik in Forschung und Praxis. Stuttgart: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie, 114–122.Google Scholar
  8. Gagné, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: CBS College Publis ing.Google Scholar
  9. Lienert, G. (1989). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. München and Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  10. Mandl, H. and Huber, G.L. (1978) (Eds.). Kognitive Komplexität. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.Google Scholar
  11. McDaniel, E. and Lawrence, C. (1990). Levels of cognitive complexity: An approach to the measurement of thinking. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O'Neil, H.F. Jr. (1978). Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schöpf, K. (1991). Pilotstudie zur Validierung der Strategischen Management Simulation SHAMBA in der deutschen Fassung. Paderborn: Diplomarbeit.Google Scholar
  14. Schroder, H.M., Driver, M.J. and Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing: Individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Schuler, H. and Funke, U. (1991) (Eds.). Eignungsdiagnostik in Forschung und Praxis. Stuttgart: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.Google Scholar
  16. Stein Greenblatt, C. (1988). Designing games and simulations. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Streufert, S. (1991). Zur Simulation komplexer Entscheidungen. Fisch, R. and Boos, M. (Eds.) Vom Umgang mit Komplexität in Organisationen: Konzepte — Fallbeispiele — Strategien. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 197–214.Google Scholar
  18. Streufert, S. (1993). Validated assessment with the SMS management simulations. Twenty-first International Congress of the Assessment Center Method. Development Dimensions International, 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Streufert, S. and Nogami, G.Y. (1989). Cognitive style and complexity: Implications for I-O Psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 93–143.Google Scholar
  20. Streufert, S., Pogash, R. and Piasecki, M. (1989). Simulation based assessment of managerial competence: Reliability and validity. Personnel Psychology, 41, 537–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Streufert, S., Pogash, R., Piasecki, M., Nogami, G.Y. and Swezey, R. (1988). Computer assisted training of complex managerial performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Streufert, S., Pogash, R., Piasecki, M. and Post, G. (1990). Age and management team performance. Psychology and Aging, 5, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Streufert, S. and Streufert, S.C. (1978). Behavior in the complex environment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Streufert, S. and Swezey, R. (1985). Simulation and related research methods in environmental psychology. Singer, J. and Baum, A. (Eds.) Advances in Environmental Psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, 99–118.Google Scholar
  25. Streufert, S. and Swezey, R. (1986). Complexity, managers and organizations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Suedfeld, P. (1992). Cognitive managers and their critics. Political Psychology, 13, 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tennyson, R.M. and Breuer, K. (1991). Complex-dynamic simulations to improve higher-order thinking strategies. Journal of Structural Learning, 11, 1–12.Google Scholar
  28. Thornton HI, G.C. and Cleveland, J.N. (1990). Developing managerial talent through simulation. American Psychologist, 45, 190–199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Breuer
    • 1
  • Siegfried Streufert
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Law and EconomicsJohannes Gutenberg-UniversitätMainz
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral SciencePennsylvania State University, College of MedicineHershey
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyPennsylvania State University (Main Campus)PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations