Skip to main content

Idea and Thing

The Deep Structure of Locke’s Theory of Knowledge

  • Chapter
The Logic of the Living Present

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 46))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aaron, R. I., “Locke’s Theory of Universals.” Aristotelian Society Proceedings, Vol. XXXIII, 1932/1933, 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, John Locke. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P., “.” I. C. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding, 62-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Curley on Locke and Boyle.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXXIII, 1974, 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Names of Secondary Qualities.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. LXXVII, 1977, 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. F., “Locke on the Knowledge of Material Things.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. III, 1965, 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K.-O., Transformation der Philosophie. 2 Vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Keijijougaku (Metaphysics). Translated by T. Ide. 2 Vols. Tokyo: Iwanami-shoten, 1959 & 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. M., “Meaning and Communication.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXX, 1971, 427–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, R. L., “Cambridge Platonists and Locke on Innate Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXX, 1969, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Berkeley’s Theory of Signification.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. VII, 1969, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, C. & Lewis, D., “Locke on Mixed Modes, Knowledge, and Substances.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. VIII, 1970, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L., Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, How to Do Things with Words. Second Edition. Edited by J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophical Papers. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J., The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Problem of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Metaphysics and Common Sense. London: Macmillan, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Language, Truth and Logic. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Russell and Moore. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • et al., The Revolution in Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Logical Positivism. London: The Free Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, M. R., “The Ideas of Power and Substance in Locke’s Philosophy.” I. C. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding, 77-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke’s Doctrine of Abstraction: Some Aspects of its Historical and Philosophical Significance.” R. Brandt (ed.), John Locke: Symposium Wolfenbuettel 1979, 5-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. P. & Hacker, P. M. S., An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Wittgenstein: Meaning and Understanding. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J., “Mr. Locke’s Darling Notion.” Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. XXII, 1972, 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W. H. F., “Did Berkeley Misunderstand Locke?” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 78-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R. & Gibson, R. (eds.), Perspectives on Quine. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, M. C., “Berkeley on ‘Abstract Ideas’.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 409-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., “Substance, Reality, and Primary Qualities.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 86-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, G., “Frege’s Hidden Nominalism.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXVII, 1958, 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Metaphysics of Logical Positivism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, G., The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Edited by A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop. 9 Vols. London: Nelson, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J., Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M., Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M. B., “Substances, Substrata, and Names of Substances in Locke’s EssayPhilosophical Review, Vol. LXXXV, 1976, 488–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R., The Works. Edited by T. Birch, with an introduction by D. McKie. 10 Vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle. Edited with an introduction by M. A. Stewart. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, H. M., The Early Reception of Berkeley’s Immaterialism 1710-1733. Revised Edition. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. (ed.), John Locke: Symposium Wolfenbuettel 1979. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F., Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Edited by O. Kraus. 3 Vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1968-1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, A., “Medieval Notions and the Theory of Idea.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. LXXXVII, 1987, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M., Das dialogische Prinzip. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubner, R. et al. (eds.), Zur Zukunft der Transzendentalphilosophie. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R., “Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache.” Erkenntnis, Vol. II, 1931, 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Ueber Protokollsaetze.” Erkenntnis, Vol. III, 1932/1933, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Meaning and Necessity. Second Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Logical Structure of the World & Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Translated by R. A. George. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caton, C. E., “An Apparent Difficulty in Frege’s Ontology.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXI, 1962, 462–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Philosophy and Ordinary Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A. F., What is This Thing Called Science? St Lucia, Qld.: University of Queensland Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. E., Metaphor. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copleston, F., A History of Philosophy, Vol. V. Garden City: Image Books, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. J., “Berkeley’s Attack on Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXVII, 1968, 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, M., John Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R., “Two Troublesome Claims about Qualities in Locke’s Essay.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXXIV, 1975, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, E. M., “Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXXI, 1972, 438–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D., Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Hintikka, J. (eds.), Words and Objections. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. W., “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXI, 1960, 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C., Brainstorms. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R., Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by C. Adam & P. Tannery. 12 Vols. Paris: J. Vrin, 1897-1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia. Paris: J. Vrin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, H., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Edited by W. Kranz. 3 Vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1951-1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doepke, F., “In Defence of Locke’s Principle: a Reply to Peter M. Simons.” Mind, Vol. XCV, 1986, 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K., “Reference and Descriptions.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXV, 1966, 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions.” Synthese, Vol. XXI, 1970, 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Speaking of Nothing.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXXIII, 1974, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evnine, S., Donald Davidson. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fann, K. T. (ed.), Symposium on J. L. Austin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. & Sellars, W. (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K., Against Method. London: New Left Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Realism, Rationalism & Scientific Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Problems of Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. G. N. (ed.), Logic and Language. First & Second Series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978 & 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Edited by P. Geach and M. Black. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “On the Foundations of Geometry.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXIX, 1960, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, E. J., Mace, C. A. & O’Connor, D. J., “Symposium: Abstract Ideas and Images.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume XXVII: Berkeley and Modern Problems, 1953, 121-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G., Wahrheit und Methode. Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, P., Opera Omnia. 6 Vols. Stuttgart: F. Frommann, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E., Words and Things. London: Victor Gollancz, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J., Locke’s Theory of Knowledge and its Historical Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. A., “Henry More and Robert Boyle on the Spirit of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXIII, 1962, 451–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee, D., “Locke’s Idea of ‘Idea’.” I. C. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding, 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke and the Controversy over Innate Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXIII, 1972, 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. & Strawson, P. F., “In Defense of a Dogma.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXV, 1956, 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F. & Guenthner-Reutter, M. (eds.), Meaning and Translation. London: Duckworth, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W. K. C., A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. I & II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962 & 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophical-Political Profiles. Translated by F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. M. S., “Are Secondary Qualities Relative?” Mind, Vol. XCV, 1986, 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R., Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Perception and Discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze, D. F., “Locke on ‘Particles’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. IX, 1970, 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G., “Quine on Meaning and Existence, I.” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. XXI, 1967, 124–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. London: Macmillan, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F., Werke. 20 Vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1969-1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M., Sein und Zeit. Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M., Revolutions & Reconstructions. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Texts without Types and Lumps without Laws.” New Literary History, Vol. XVII, 1983, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “On Theories and Metaphors: A Comment on Mary Hesse’s Paper.” New Literary History, Vol. XVII, 1985, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holenstein, E., Von der Hintergehbarkeit der Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D., The Philosophical Works. Edited by T. H. Green & T. H. Grose. 4 Vols. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E., “Ideen zu einer reinen Phaenomenologie und phaenomenologischen Philosophie.” Husserl E. (ed.), Jahrbuch fuer Philosophie und phaenomenologische Forschung, Vol. I, 1913, 1–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Erfahrung und Urteil. Edited by L. Landgrebe. Prague: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Erste Philosophie (1923/1924). Edited by R. Boehm. 2 Vols. Husserliana, Vol. VII & VIII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1956 & 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophie der Arithmetik. Edited by L. Eley. Husserliana, Vol. XII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vortraege. Edited by S. Strasser. Husserliana, Vol. I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Formale und transzendentale Logik. Edited by P. Janssen. Husserliana, Vol. XVII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Logische Untersuchungen, Vol. I. Edited by E. Holenstein. Husserliana, Vol. XVIII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Logische Untersuchungen, Vol. II, Part 1 & 2. Edited by U. Panzer. Husserliana, Vol. XIX/1 & XIX/2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, H., “Frege’s Ontology.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXIX, 1960, 394–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., “Locke’s Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 53-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke’s Version of the Doctrine of Representative Perception.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 125-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W., The Essential Writings. Edited by B. Wilshire, with a preface by J. M. Edie. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J., Understanding Locke. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen, J., The Development of Logical Empiricism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C., “Locke’s Examination of Malebranche and John Norris.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XIX, 1958, 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambartel, F., Theorie und Begruendung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Erfahrung und Struktur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Praktische Philosophie und konstruktive Wissenschafts-theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Mittelstrass, J. (eds.), Zum normativen Fundament der Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaeum Verlag, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Prolegomena. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A., Wittgenstein. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. & Schofield, M., The Presocratic Philosophers. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemke, E. D., “Professor Bergmann and Frege’s ‘Hidden Nominalism’.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXVIII, 1959, 507–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Essays on Bertrand Russell. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H. (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, V., Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, J. L., John Locke. New York: Philosophical Library, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, N., “The Main Thesis of Locke’s Semantic Theory.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXVII, 1968, 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A., Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, R. W. F., “The Question of Locke’s Relation to Gassendi.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XLV, 1984, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition, Enlarged. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Edited by J. Worrall & G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P., “Locke and the First Earl of Shaftesbury.” Mind, Vol. LXI, 1952, 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L., “The Nature and Sources of Locke’s Views on Hypotheses.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXVIII, 1967, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W., Opera Philosophica Omnia. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePore, E. (ed.), Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. C., “Locke on Mixed Modes, Knowledge, and Substances.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. VIII, 1970, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J., Essays on the Law of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Collated and annotated by A. C. Fraser. 2 Vols. New York: Dover, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Works of John Locke. A New Edition, Corrected. 10 Vols. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Ningenchiseiron (An Essay Concerning Human Understanding). Translated by H. Otsuki. 4 Vols. Tokyo: Iwanami-shoten, 1972-1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by A. D. Woozley. Bergenfield: Meridian, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings, Vol. I. Edited by P. H. Nidditch & G. A. J. Rogers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. & Mittelstrass, J., “Die Hintergehbarkeit der Sprache.” Kant-studien, Vol. LVIII, 1967, 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luebbe, H. (ed.), Wozu Philosophie? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F., The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbott, J. D., John Locke. London: Macmillan, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. (ed.), Philosophy and Analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L., “Locke’s Anticipation of Kripke.” Analysis, Vol. XXXIV, No. 6 (New Series No. 162), 1974, 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Problems from Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, B., Men of Ideas. London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W., “Frege’s Theory of Functions and Objects.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXII, 1953, 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Sense and Reference: A Reply.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXV, 1956, 342–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. B. & Armstrong, D. M. (eds.), Locke and Berkeley. London: Macmillan, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. E., “Locke, Malebranche and the Representative Theory.” I. C. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding, 55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., “Cartesian Selves and Lockean Substances.” Monist, Vol. LXIX, 1986, 458–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. E., “Boyle’s Conception of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXIII, 1972, 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, R., “‘Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXVI, 1965, 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiland, J. W. & Krausz, M. (eds.), Relativism: Cognitive and Moral. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J., Das praktische Fundament der Wissenschaft und die Aufgabe der Philosophie. Konstanz: Universitaetsverlag, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Die Moeglichkeit von Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Wissenschaftstheorie als Wissenschaftskritik. Frankfurt am Main: Aspekte Verlag, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Methodenprobleme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E., Philosophical Studies. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “A Defence of Common Sense.” Contemporary British Philosophy, Edited by J. H. Muirhead. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1925, 193–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Some Main Problems of Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Lectures on Philosophy. Edited by C. Lewy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. T., “Locke’s Analysis of Language and the Assent to Scripture.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXVII, 1976, 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulds, G. H., “A Note on Locke and the Knowledge of Material Things.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. IV, 1966, 325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munitz, M. K., Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl, L. & Heinrich, R. (eds.), Wo steht die Analytische Philosophie heute? Vienna: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, S. L., “Locke’s Theory of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XI, 1973, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O., “Protokollsaetze.” Erkenntnis, Vol. 3, 1932/1933, 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., The Deconstructive Turn. London: Methuen, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odegard, D., “Locke and Mind-Body Dualism.” Philosophy, Vol. XLV, 1970, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, M. J., “John Locke and the Changing Ideal of Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXI, 1970, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D., “Locke and Berkeley on the Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXX, 1969, 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.), The Theory of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J., A Hundred Years of Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, G. & Maynard, P. (eds.), Conceptual Change. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. L., “Locke on Mixed Modes, Relations, and Knowledge.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. V, 1967, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter of Spain, Tractatus Syncategorematum. Translated by J. P. Mullally. Milwaukee: The Marquette University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Tractatus (Summule Logicales). Edited by L. M. De Rijk. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, G. (ed.), Wittgenstein. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H., “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality, 215-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Reason and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Realism and Reasons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Many Faces of Realism. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Representation and Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Realism with a Human Face. Edited and introduced by J. Conant. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O., “On Frege’s Way Out.” Mind, Vol. LXIV, 1955, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Roots of Reference. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, From a Logical Point of View. Second Edition, Revised. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Theories and Things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabb, J. D., John Locke on Reflection. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajchman, J. & West, C. (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramberg, B. T., Donald Davidson’s Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, W., “Hermeneutics versus Stupidities of all Sorts: A Review-discussion of R. Rorty’s ‘Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature’.” Zeitschrift fuer allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, Vol. XIV, 1983, 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. A. J., “Boyle, Locke, and Reason.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXVII, 1966, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke’s Essay and Newton’s Principia.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXIX, 1978, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke, Newton, and the Cambridge Platonists on Innate Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XL, 1979, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanell, P., “Some Medico-Philosophical Excerpts from the Mellon Collection of Locke Papers.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXV, 1964, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanos, G. D., Quine and Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. M., “Strawson’s Objectivity Argument.” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. XXIII, 1970, 207–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Verificationism and Transcendental Arguments.” Nous, Vol. V, 1971, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Criteria and Necessity.” Nous, Vol. VIII, 1973, 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Realism and Reference.” Monist, Vol. LIX, 1976, 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Rentaito Jiyuno Tetsugaku (Philosophy of/for Solidarity and Freedom). Edited and translated by Y. Tomida. Tokyo: Iwanami-shoten, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Essays on Heidegger and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), The Linguistic Turn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • et al. (eds.), Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (ed.), Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “On Denoting.” Mind, Vol. XIV, 1905, 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Human Knowledge. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Logic and Knowledge. Edited by R. C. Marsh. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, My Philosophical Development. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “John Locke on the Human Understanding.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 14-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, S. (ed.), On Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P., The Transcendence of the EGO. New York: The Noonday Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, E. & Vossenkuhl, W. (eds.), Bedingungen der Moeglichkeit. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleichen, H. (ed.), Logischer Empirismus: der Wiener Kreis. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. P., Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R., “Russell’s Objections to Frege’s Theory of Sense and Reference.” Analysis, Vol. XVIII, 1957/1958, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Proper Names.” Mind, Vol. LXVII, 1958, 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilars, W., Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Science, Sense Impressions, and Sensa: A Reply to Cornman.” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. XXIV, 1971, 391–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankula, H. A., “Locke, Descartes, and the Science of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XLI, 1980, 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, C., A Short History of Scientific Ideas to 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soles, D. E., “Locke’s Empiricism and the Postulation of Unobservables.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XXIII, 1985, 339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Filho, D. M. de, Language and Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, D. H., “Locke, Leibniz, and Wiggins on Being in the Same Place at the Same Time.” Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXIX, 1970, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T., The History of Philosophy. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillingfleet, E., Three Criticisms of Locke. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F., Individuals. London: Methuen, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Logico-Linguistic Papers. London: Methuen, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F., The Structure of Scientific Theories. Second Edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swabey, W. C., “Locke’s Theory of Ideas.” Philosophical Review, Vol. XLII, 1933, 573–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipton, I. C. (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomida, Y., “Chikakudaihyosetsuto Bunsetsuon” (“Representative Theory of Perception and Articulate Sounds”). Eizangakuin Kenkyukiyo (The Bulletin of Eizangakuin), Vol. II, Otsu, 1979, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke-no Tanjunkannenno Aru Touitsuteki Seikaku” (“A Common Character of Locke’s Simple Ideas”). Tetsugaku (Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Japan), Vol. XXXI, Tokyo, 1981, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Tanjunkannento Chushou” (“Simple Ideas and Abstraction”). Kyotokyoikudaigaku Kiyo (The Bulletin of Kyoto University of Education), Ser. A, No. 63, 1983, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Kisozukeka Rentaika” (“Foundation or Solidarity?”). Shiso, No. 743, Tokyo, 1986, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Chokkan, Goi, Jikokeisei” (“Intuition, Vocabulary, and Self-Formation”). Riso, No. 634, Tokyo, 1987, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke-niokeru Keikentekitaishouto Monojitai” (“Experiential Objects and Things Themselves in Locke’s Essay”). Shiso, No. 787, Tokyo, 1990, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Shizenshumeito Nishuruino Honshitsu” (“Natural Kind Terms and Two Kinds of ‘Essence’ ”). Jinbun, Vol. XXXVI, Kyoto, 1990, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Locke-tetsugakuno Kakusareta Ronri (A Hidden Logic of Locke’s Philosophy). Tokyo: Keiso-shobo, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Hansoutaishugino Hitotsuno Katachi” (“Davidsonian Anti-Relativism”). Rinrigaku Kenkyu, Vol. XXI, Kyoto, 1991, 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J. O., Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G. J., J. L. Austin. London: Routledge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienpahl, P. D., “Frege’s Sinn und Bedeutung.”Mind, Vol. LIX, 1949, 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J., Paradox and Discovery. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, On Certainty. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, R. S., “Locke’s Idea of Spatial Extension.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. VIII, 313-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Locke’s Philosophy of Science and Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Locke on Modes, Substances, and Knowledge.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. X, 1972, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Locke. Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woozley, A. D., “Some Remarks on Locke’s Account of Knowledge.” I. C. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding, 141-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolton, J. W., “Locke and the Seventeenth-Century Logic of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XVI, 1955, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, John Locke and the Way of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “The Concept of Experience in Locke and Hume.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. I, 1963, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolton, J. W.—, “Locke’s Concept of Experience.” C. B. Martin & D. M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley, 40-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.), Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, R. M., “Locke’s Rejection of Hypotheses about Sub-Microscopic Events.” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XII, 1951, 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomida, Y. (1995). Idea and Thing. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Logic of the Living Present. Analecta Husserliana, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0463-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0463-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4207-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0463-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics