Skip to main content

Statistical Approaches to Seismic Discrimination

  • Chapter
Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 303))

Abstract

Conventional methods for discriminating between earthquakes and explosions at regional distances have concentrated on extracting specific features from the waveforms of the two arrival phases seen on the seismic record, denoted in this paper by P and S. The specific features usually considered are amplitude ratios, measures of waveform complexity or various kinds of spectral ratios, suggesting that the main characterization of the differences between earthquakes and explosions can be reduced to comparing differences between the amplitude ratios or the spectral ratios of the two arrival phases. For purposes of discussion, we will term this approach the feature extraction approach. The variations on the above theme seem to change depending on the author and on the general region within which the discrimination study is done. The features may then combined using an optimal statistical procedure that assumes multivariate normality for the extracted feature vector and maximizes the probability of detecting an explosion for a fixed specified rate of false alarms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alagon, J. (1989). Spectral discrimination for two groups of time series. J. Time Series Analysis, 10, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, T.W. (1971). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd. ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, T.J. and J.R. Murphy (1986). Analysis of seismic discrimination capabilities using regional data from western U.S. events. Bull. Seismolog. Soc. Amer., 76, 1069–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blandford, R.R. (1993). Discrimination of earthquakes and explosions at regional distances using complexity. Presented at Air Force Technical Applications Review, Patrick AFB, Feb. 16–17, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Booker, A. and W. Mitronovas (1964). An application of statistical discrimination to classify seismic events. Bull Seismolog. Soc. Amer., 54, 951–971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavanaugh, J.R., A.D.R. McQuarrie and R.H. Shumway (1993). Parametric and nonparametric discriminants for regional earthquakes and explosions. PL-TR-93-2164, Phillips Laboratory, Directorate of Geophysics, Air Force Materiel Command, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731-3010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dargahi-Noubary, G.R. and P.J. Laycock (1981). Spectral ratio discriminants and information theory. J. Time Series Analysis, 2, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dysart, P. and J.J. Pulli (1990). Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and the use of trained neural networks. Bull. Seismolog. Soc. Amer., 80, 1910–1933.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisk, M.D., H.L. Gray and G.D. McCartor (1993). Applications of generalized likelihood ratio tests to seismic event identification. PL-TR-2221, Phillips Laboratory, Directorate of Geophysics, Air Force Materiel Command, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731-3010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kullback, S. (1959). Information Theory and Statistics. Reprinted (1978), Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lachenbruch, P.A. and M.R. Mickey (1968). Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics, 10, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liggett, W.S. (1971). On the asymptotic optimality of spectral analysis for testing hypotheses about time series. Ann. Math. Statist. 1348–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pinsker, M.S. (1964). Information and Information Stability of Random Variables and Processes. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Renyi, A. (1961). On measures of entropy and information. Proc. 4th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probability, 1960, 1, 546–561, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richards, P.G., W-Y Kim and G. Ekström (1993). RMS Lg studies of underground nuclear explosions in the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. PL-TR-93-3227, Phillips Laboratory, Directorate of Geophysics, Air Force Materiel Command, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731-3010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryall, A.S., Jr. ed. (1993). The Novaya Zemlya event of 31 December 1992 and seismic identification issues. 15th Annual Seismic Research Symposium, 8–10 Sept. 1993, Vail Colorado, Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shumway, R.H. (1982). Discriminant analysis for time series. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 2, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality, ed. P.R. Krishnaiah, 1–43. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shumway, R.H. (1988). Applied Statistical Time Series Analysis, Chapter 5. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shumway, R.H. and R. Blandford (1974). An examination of some new and classical short period discriminants. Seismic Data Analysis Center, Report No. TR-74-10, P.O. Box 334, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shumway, R.H. and A.N. Unger (1974). Linear discriminant functions for stationary time series, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 69, 948–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor, S.R., M.R. Denny, E.S. Vergino and R.E. Glaser (1989). Regional discrimination between NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes (1989). Bull. Seismolog. Soc. Amer., 79, 1142–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whittle, P. (1954). Estimation and information in stationary time series. Arkiv. Matematik, 2, 423–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, T. and M. Taniguchi (1994). Discriminant analysis for stationary vector time series. J. Time Series Analysis, 15, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, T. and M. Taniguchi (1993). Discriminant analysis for stationary time series. Presented at U.S.-Japan Seminar on Statistical Time Series Analysis, Jan. 25–29, 1993, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shumway, R.H. (1996). Statistical Approaches to Seismic Discrimination. In: Husebye, E.S., Dainty, A.M. (eds) Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. NATO ASI Series, vol 303. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4187-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0419-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics