Skip to main content

Trinity or Verity ?

A Discussion of the Relative Merits of Seismological Single-Station Three-Component and Single-Component Array Data

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 303))

Abstract

Single-station three-component analysis is applied to seismic recordings in Norway from quarry blasts on the Kola peninsula. Even for P-waves, non-linear particle motions are observed, implying phase shifts between the horizontal and vertical components. Such instantaneous phase-lags provide direct and useful information on the arrival of different wave types, and this is illustrated. For P-waves, the most probable origin of these phase shifts is scattering and P-to-S conversion. Phase-lags are also observed for later phases. Using signal particle motion models which allow for phase shifts we have been successful in analysing several different phases (P, S and Lg) in these complex regional events. Such results contrast with various previous studies of this and similar data, in which three-component analysis was found to be relatively ineffective. We attribute this significant difference in results in part to sub-optimal processing parameters and/or three-component analysis methods in some of the earlier studies e.g. analysis based on visual inspection of particle motion figures (very difficult where phase-lags are involved) or on eigenvector analysis where the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix, and thus uncorrelated noise, have a large influence. Incorporating seismic wavefield physics leads to signal models which can be expressed primarily in terms of off-diagonal elements and such models are therefore inherently more robust.

The relative information content and thus cost-effectiveness of single-component arrays and three-component data are compared, and our results indicate that in many circumstances the three-component configuration is by far the most cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hu G., Menke W. and Rögnvaldsson S.Th. (1993) A demonstration of the joint use of P-wave polarization and travel-time data in tomographic inversion: Crustal velocity structure near the South Iceland Lowland Network. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20 1407–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts R.G., Lindfors A., Christoffersson A., Bödvarsson R. and Rögnvaldsson S.Th. (1993) Three-component data as an aid to seismic event detection and association: A case study using data from the SIL (Iceland) network. Computers and Geosciences 19 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kvaerna T, and Ringdal F. (1992) Integrated array and three-component processing using a seismic microarray. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 82 870–882.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts R.G. and Christoffersson A. (1990) Decomposition of complex single-station three-component seismograms. Geophys. J. Int 103 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jepsen D.C. and Kennett B.L.N. (1990) Three-component analysis of regional seismograms. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 80 2032–2052.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magotra N., Ahmed N., Chael E. (1987) Seismic event detection and source location using single-station three-component data. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 77 958–971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jurkevics A. (1988) Polarization analysis of three-component array data. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 78 1725–1743.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Der Z.A., Baumgardt D.R. and Shumway R.H. (1993) The nature of particle motion in regional seismograms and its utilization for phase identification. Geophys. J. Int. 115 1012–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christoffersson A., Husebye E.S. and Ingate S. (1988) Wavefield decomposition using ML probabilities in single-site three-component records. Geophys. J. 93 197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts R.G. and Christoffersson A. (1991) Seismic signal detection. A better mousetrap ? Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 81 2511–2515.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hestholm S.O., Husebye E.S. and Ruud B.O. (1994) Seismic wave propagation in complex crust-upper mantle media using 2-D finite difference synthetics. Geophys. J. Int. 118 643–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruud B.O. and Husebye E.H. (1992) A new three-component detector and automatic single-station bulletin production. Bull Seis. Soc. Am. 82 221–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruud B.O., Lindholm C.D. and Husebye E.H. (1993) An exercise in automating seismic record analysis and network bulletin production. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 83 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts R.G., Christoffersson A. and Cassidy F. (1989) Real time event detection, phase identification and source location estimation using single-station three-component seismic data. Geophys. J. Int. 97 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stefansson R., Bödvarsson R., Slunga R., Einarsson P., Jakobsdottir J., Bungum H., Gregresen S., Havskov J., Hjelme J. and Korhonen H. (1993) The SIL project, background and perspectives for earthquake prediction in the South Iceland Seismic Zone. Bull Seis. Soc. Am. 83 696–716.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taner M.T., Koehler F. and Sheriff R.E. (1979) Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics 44 1041–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park J., Vernon F.L. and Lindberg C.R. (1987) Frequency dependent polarization analysis of high frequency seismograms. J. Geophys. Res. 92 12664–12674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Der Z. A., Shumway R.H. and Lees A.C. (1987) Multi-channel deconvolution of P waves at seismic arrays. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 77 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindfors A. and Roberts R.G. (1994) Array processing via phase regression.This volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christoffersson, A., Roberts, R. (1996). Trinity or Verity ?. In: Husebye, E.S., Dainty, A.M. (eds) Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. NATO ASI Series, vol 303. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4187-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0419-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics