Skip to main content

The Increasingly Inextricable Relationship between Orthographic and Phonological Coding in Learning to Read: Some Reservations about Current Methods of Operationalizing Orthographic Coding

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Neuropsychology and Cognition ((NPCO,volume 11))

Abstract

Unlike phonological coding, orthographic coding as a psychological construct is not well understood and has not been well defined. Currently, the most often used tasks to measure orthographic coding include orthographic choice (“which is a real word?”—rain, rune), homophone choice (“which is a number?”—ate, eight), spelling recognition (time, tient, tihm, teirn) and, more recently, spelling from dictation. In the present chapter, we express our reservations about using these measures because, in our opinion, they evaluate word identification and/or spelling ability rather than orthographic coding as a basic cognitive process that underlies word identification and spelling ability. We present research findings from our laboratory and review research done elsewhere to support our reservations. We also point out the risk of using only reading level match designs in evaluating orthographic coding effects. Using our data, we show that matching samples based on one reading variable creates a mismatch on another, and that interpretations of the findings based on exclusive employment of this type of design are inevitably problematic. We also discuss research that shows that matching poor and normal readers on tests that depend heavily on word specific knowledge, in particular tests of word identification and/or spelling ability, will tend to equate these groups on orthographic coding tasks that also depend heavily on word specific knowledge, while matching them on tests that depend heavily on pseudoword decoding ability will tend to equate them on orthographic coding tasks that also depend heavily on general orthographic knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, R. (1994). The sound-to-spelling connections: Orthographic-activation in auditory word recognition and its implications for the acquisition of phonological awareness and literacy skills. In V.W. Berninger (Ed), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 219–242). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B.A. (1993). Early literacy acquisition: The role of phonological awareness. In G. Wallach and K. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school age children and adolescents: Some underlying principles and applications. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 303, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S.A., & Shankweiler, D.P. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. A Tribute to Isabelle Liberman. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, N.D. (1963). Diagnostic test of phonic skills. Published by the author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T.H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Volume 5 (pp. 1–82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–213). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance, VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C.K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, D.W. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210, 658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran. D.W., & Weening, D.L. (1968). Acoustic factors in visual speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 83–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R. (1976). Naming of pictured objects by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 39, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tannenhaus, M.K., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1981). Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme-monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 17, 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.M., & Markwardt, F.C. (1979). Peabody individual achievement test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E.J., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J.V., & Gilmore, E.C. (1968). Gilmore oral reading test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B. (1972). One second of reading. In J.F. Kavanagh & I.G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B. (1984). Word recognition. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil & P.D. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol 1 (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A.J., & Jacobson, M.D. (1982). Basic reading vocabularies. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G.W., & Evett, L.J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory in reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakimik, J., Cole, R.A., & Rudnicky, A.I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 262–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T., Anderson, W.G., & Berrian, R.W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S.C., & Hammill, D.D. (1986). Test of written spelling-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, P.H., & Norman, D.A. (1972). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F.R. (1993, March). A longitudinal study of print exposure, phonological skill and orthographic skill in normal and disabled readers. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F.R., Custodio, R., & Szeszulski, P.A. (1993). Development of phonological and orthographic skill: A two-year longitudinal study of dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 64–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F.R., Szeszulski, P.A., Holt, L.K., & Graves, K. (1990). Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. In T. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 207–259). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayzner, M.S. & Tresselt, M.E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and bigram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psychonomic Science Monograph Supplements, 1, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Bell, L.C., France, I.M., & Perfetti, C.A. (1991). Phonemic-specific interference in reading: The visual tongue-twister effect revisited. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C.A. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 672–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R.W., & Ruddy, M.G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment and the development of orthographic skills. In V.W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic and phonological skills. In R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243–278). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., & Rack, J. (1990). Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In T. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, C.F. (1987). A comparison of poor and normal readers in categorical grouping of printed English and novel letter words characterized by identical orthographic structure. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms. of word identification: Evidence for backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A., Bell, L.C., & Delaney, S.M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J.P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 325–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S.S., & Rubenstein, M.A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S., & Tannenhaus, M.K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I.Y., Mark, L.S., Fowler, C.A., & Fischer, F.W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1993, March). Dyslexics have orthographic skills that are superior to normal readers. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spache, G.D. (1963). Diagnostic reading scales, Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & West, R.F. (1993, March). Phonological and orthographic processes in reading development. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Cunningham, A.E. (1991). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. In S.A. Brady & D.P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy — A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 219–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenhaus, M.K., Flanigan, M.P., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 8, 513–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L., & Thurstone, T.G. (1962). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F. & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. (1982). Theoretical issues in the study of word recognition: The unit of perception controversy re-examined. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Handbook of applied psycholinguistics (pp. 33–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. (1987). Dyslexia. Scientific American, March, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. & Scanlon, D.M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S.G., & Tanzman, M.S. (1991). The linguistic basis of reading ability: Converting written to oral language. Text, 11, 99–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Spearing, D. (1995). Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1991). Bridging the gap between cognitive and neuropsychological conceptualizations of reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding and orthographic coding. In G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279–329). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zecker, S.G. (1991). The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading disabled and normally achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 178–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Chen, R.S. (1995). The Increasingly Inextricable Relationship between Orthographic and Phonological Coding in Learning to Read: Some Reservations about Current Methods of Operationalizing Orthographic Coding. In: Berninger, V.W. (eds) The Varieties of Orthographic Knowledge. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0385-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0385-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4172-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0385-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics