Skip to main content

Self-Organization: New Foundations Towards a “General Theory of Reality”

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 21))

Summary

In this paper, an attempt will be made to show that the fundamental conceptual categories of the Theory of Self-Organization (TSO) furnish novel opportunities for depicting man’s position in the world. Preparatory work towards a theory of process-evolutive understanding of reality where the structure and dynamic of nature and culture can be represented in a unified way becomes possible. Then we can identify a convergence between the understanding of reality as mediated by the “Science of Nature” on the one hand, and the understanding of reality as propagated by the“Science of Man” (self-understanding) on the other. The philosophical reconstruction of the meaning of TSO leads to the realization that a new type of science can be developed; it will be a symbiosis of the “Science of Nature” and the “Science of Man”. Up to now, the “natural sciences” have not been able to provide a suitable approach to man or society as a whole. A similar situation, but linked to much more serious problems, can be found in the humanities and the social sciences; both of them have so far also failed to provide an adequate approach to nature as a whole. TSO fundamentally changes the situation: it is an increasingly integrated component of thinking in the categories of the natural sciences; and this makes possible a new type of modeling social processes. As a naturalistic system of science, TSO does away with the apparent difference between the categories of material and social structures. The implementation of TSO in the categories of social-scientific thinking shows that, for the first time, a socio-scientific approach to nature has become possible. Any efforts in the direction of identification and development of new presuppositions for establishing a “general theory of reality” will share an ultimate goal: to grasp the human thinking process itself as reality; and this means, finally, to show that the socio-cognitive structures can be imbedded in reality in a consistent manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bohm, D. [1984], Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Ark Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, M., Mittelstraß, J. [1991], Das Leib-Seele-Problem und die Philosophie der Psychologie X, Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erpenbeck, J. [1993], Wollen und Werden, Universitätsverlag Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, F. [1991], The Cybernetics of Complex Systems, Salinas, CA: Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1991], “Hypercritical physical realism and the categorial changes in the subject-object relations”, in: La Nuova Critica, pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J., Leinfellner, W. [1994], “Erwin Schrödinger’s world view: the role of physics and biology in his philosophical system”, in: What is Controlling Life? 50 years after Erwin Schrödinger’s What is Life?, E. Gnaiger, F.N. Gellerich, M. Wyss (eds.), Modern Trends in BioThermoKinetics, Vol. 3, Innsbruck: University Press, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1989], “Philosophical and scientific conceptions of nature and the place of responsibility”, in: La Nuova Critica, pp. 5–22. For an abridged version of this paper with stronger emphasis on the coupling of material and non-material structural levels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1990],“Philosophical and scientific conceptions of nature and the place of responsibility”, in: International Journal of Science Education, pp. 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1992], Erwin Schrödinger’s world view: the dynamics of knowledge and reality,Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1990], “Zur philosophischen Bedeutung des Paradigmas der Selbstorganisation für den Zusammenhang von Naturverständnis und Selbstverständnis”, in: Selbstorganisation -Aspekte einer wissenschaftlichen Revolution, Krohn, W., Küppers, G. (eds.), Braunschweig: Vieweg, pp.181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. [1986], “Zum Subjekt-Objekt-Problem von transzendentaler und evolutionärer Erkenntnistheorie”, in: Transzendentale oder evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, Lütterfelds (ed.),Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörz, H. [1994], Selbstorganisation sozialer Systeme, Lit Verlag, Münster/Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. [1979], Die Selbstorganisation des Universums, München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. [1985], Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. [1977], Self-Organization in nonequilibrium systems: from dissipative structures to Order through fluctuations, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. [1989], Exploring complexity systems, New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. [1989], The emperor’s new mind, Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. [1984], Order out of chaos, New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R., Huber, L., Ackermann [1991], “Rational versus ratiomorphic strategies in human cognition”, in: Evolution and cognition 1, pp. 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. [1958], Mind and matter, Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. [1992], The rediscovery of mind, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. [1967], Science and the modern world, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. [1978], Process and reality:an essay in cosmology, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, M.F. [1984], Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology, Theory and Decision Library, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. [1985], Spontaneous social orders, in: The science and praxis of complexity, The United Nations University, pp. 312–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Götschl, J. (1995). Self-Organization: New Foundations Towards a “General Theory of Reality”. In: Götschl, J. (eds) Revolutionary Changes in Understanding Man and Society. Theory and Decision Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0369-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0369-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4165-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0369-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics