Advertisement

Obstetric Emergencies

  • C. P. Gibbs
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology book series (DCCA, volume 30)

Abstract

The incidence of breech presentation is approximately 4%. However, because nearly two-thirds of all breech presentations are able to be changed to vertex presentations by external version, the resulting practical incidence is closer to 1.5%.

Keywords

Cesarean Section Vaginal Delivery Regional Anesthesia Fetal Distress Breech Presentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Myers SA, Gleicher N: Breech delivery: Why the dilemma? AJOG 156:6, 1987Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collea JV et al: The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: Vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section. AJOG 131:186, 1978Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morrison JC et al: External cephalic version of the breech presentation under tocolysis. AJOG 154:900, 1986Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chervenak FA et al: Intrapartum management of twin gestation. OB/GYN 65:119, 1985Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabinovici J et al: Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: Vaginal delivery or cesarean section. AJOG 156:52, 1987Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeSimone CA et al: Intravenous nitroglycerin aids manual extraction of a retained placenta. Anesthesiology 73:787, 1990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rolbin SH et al: Uterine relaxation can be life saving. Can J Anaes 39:939–940, 1990Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acker DB et al: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. OB/GYN 66:762, 1985Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marx GF et al: Fetal-neonatal status following caesarean section for fetal distress. Br J Anaesth 56:1009, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz VL et al: Perimortem cesarean delivery. OB/GYN 68:571, 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kerr MG et al: Studies of the inferior vena cava in late pregnancy. Br Med J 1:532,1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bieniarz J et al: Aortocaval compression by the uterus in late human pregnancy. AJOG 100:203, 1968Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cugell DW et al: Pulmonary function in pregnancy. Am Rev Tuberc 67:568, 1953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baldwin GR et al: New lung functions and pregnancy. AJOG 127:235, 1977Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pernoll ML et al: Oxygen consumption at rest and during exercise in pregnancy. Resp Physiol 25:285, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Archer GW et al: Arterial oxygen tension during apnoea in parturient women. Br J Anaesthesia 46:358, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ueland K et al: Maternal cardiovascular dynamics IV: The influence of gestational age on the maternal cardiovascular response to posture and exercise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 104:856, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marx GF: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the late pregnant woman. Anesthesiology 56:156, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DePace NL et al: ‘Postmortem’ cesarean section with recovery of both mother and offspring. JAMA 248:971, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kasten GW, Martin ST: Resuscitation from bupivacaine-induced cardiovascular toxicity during partial inferior vena cava occlusion. Anesth Analg 65:341–344, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan M: Amniotic fluid embolism. Anesthesia 34:29, 1979Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clark SL: Amniotic fluid embolism. Crit Care Clinics 7:877–882, 1991Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watananukul P et al: Amniotic fluid embolism: Report of five cases. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 10:424, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderson DG: Amniotic fluid embolism. A re-evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 98:336, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duff P: Defusing the dangers of amniotic fluid embolism. Contempt Obstet Gynecol 127, 1984Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clark SL et al: Squamous cells in the maternal pulmonary artery circulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:104, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cotton DB et al: Squamous and trophoblastic cells in the maternal pulmonary circulation identified by invasive hemodynamic monitoring during the peripartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:999, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clark SL et al: Central hemodynamic alterations in amniotic fluid embolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:1124–1126, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Girard P et al: Left heart failure in amniotic fluid embolism. Anesthesiology 64:262–265, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceneral References

  1. 1.
    Clark SL, ed. Critical care clinics: Obstetric emergencies. Philadelphia, PA, W. B. Saunders Company, Vol 7, 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark SL, ed. Critical care obstetrics. Oradell, NJ, Medical Economics Books, 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. P. Gibbs

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations