Abstract
Health has not generally been viewed as a proper object of philosophical study. It is not well known that health and health care were important topics for Plato and Aristotle, as well as for Descartes, Locke, and Kant. Few people know that the dominant school of medicine in Europe until the seventeenth century — Galenic medicine — was an application of central themes in Aristotle’s natural philosophy, or that many of the schools that followed were highly influenced by Descartes’ philosophy of man. Even fewer would believe that philosophical analysis or speculation could make any valuable contribution to modern medicine. Medicine has for a long time — so many would put it — been liberating itself from the bonds of philosophy in its move to become an empirical science.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nordenfelt, L. (1995). Some Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Health. In: On the Nature of Health. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0241-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0241-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3470-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0241-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive