Skip to main content

Bioethics in Australia: 1991–1993

  • Chapter
Bioethics Yearbook

Part of the book series: Bioethics Yearbook ((BIYB,volume 4))

  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

Australia has a federal government system where the central Commonwealth government in Canberra competes in the medical and health care fields with the six state governments -New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania -and two territory governments -the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory. As a result there are state laws and legal structures and organizations dealing with biœthical issues which are sometimes a variance with each other and also at variance with Commonwealth laws and structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. The Age, 1993, Melbourne, November 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, Michael, and Wakefield, Melanie: 1993.: “Attitudes to some aspects of death and dying, living wills and substituted health care decision making in South Australia”. Public opinion survey for a parliamentary select committee, Parliament of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brahams, Diana: 1991, “Australian mother sued by child injured in utero”, The Lancet, 338, pp. 687–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmers, D., and Schwartz, R.: 1993, ”Rogers v.Whitaker and Informed Consent in Australia: A Fair Dinkum Duty of Disclosure”, Medical Law Review, 1, pp. 139–159,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlesworth, Max.; 1993, Bioethics in a Liberal Society, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Choice or Chance? The Ethics of Resource Allocation for Minority Groups: 1993, Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, Josephine: 1991, “Facing Up to the Duty of Surveillance: An Ongoing Relationship Between Institutional Ethics Committees and Researchers”, Bioethics News, Monash Centre for Human Bioethics. 10, July, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Distributing Health Care Resources: Ethical Assumptions: 1992, Australian Health Ethics Committee. NHMRC, GPO Box 9848, Canberra ACT 2601.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ethics and Resource Allocation in Australian Health Care: 1992,Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ethical Considerations Relating to Health Care Resource Allocation Decisions: 1993, Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guidelines on Ethical Matters in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research: 1991, NHMRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Health Services and Ethnic Communities: An Agenda for Change: 1991, Report of the Victorian Ministerial Taskforce on Ethnic Health.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kovacs, G. T., Mushin, D., Kane, H., Baker, H. W. G.: 1993 “A controlled study of the psychosocial development of children conceived by insemination with donor semen”, Human Reproduction, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhse, H.: 1993, “Medically assisted suicide Bill”, Bioethics News, Monash Centre for Human Bioethics, October 12, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lane, Margaret J.: 1991: “Privacy protection and medical research: ethical and legal issues in public health”, Bioethics News, Monash University, October 11, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legal liability, insurance and indemnity arrangements for Institutional Ethics Committees: 1993, Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loblay R.: 1993, Use of Routine Blood and Tissue Samples for Research, Discussion paper for Australian Health Ethics Committee, Canberra, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McNeill, Paul: 1993, The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mendelson, D.: 1992, ”The Medical Treatment (Enduring Power of Attorney) Act and assisted suicide: the legal position in Victoria”, Bioethics News, October 12, pp. 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Monash Centre for Human Bioethics: 1989, The Fetus as Tissue Donor: Use or Abuse? Monash University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan Computer Reports: 1993, Sydney, No. 1222.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Health and Medical Research Council: 1993, General Guidelines for Medical Practitioners on Providing Information to Patients, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Place of Ethics in Health Care Resource Allocation: Where to Now?: 1992, Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reid, Janice and Trompf, Peggy: 1990, The Health of Immigrant Australia: A Social Perspective, Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers v. Whitaker (1992) 67 A.L.J.R. 47 (High Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skene, L.: 1991, The Baby M Inquest: Treating Children with Severe Spina Bifida, Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smallwood, R. A.: 1991, “Privacy laws and their effect on medical research”, The Medical Journal of Australia, 154, February 4, pp. 158–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. South Australian Council on Reproductive Technology: 1993, Families by Donation: Donated eggs or sperm, does it make a difference to the family? Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Standing Review and Advisory Committee on Infertility: 1991, Report to the Minister for Health on Matters Related to the “Review of ’post-syngamy’Embryo Experimentation”: Part III: Recommendations for amendment of the Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act 1984, Health Department of Victoria, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stevens, Christine A., and Hassan, R.: 1993, Management of Death, Dying and Euthanasia; Attitudes and Practices of Medical Practitioners and Nurses in South Australia, School of Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Voluntary and Natural Death Bill, 1993. Copies of the Bill may be obtained from The Hon. Michael Moore MLA, Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory, I Constitution Avenue, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Western Australian Reproductive Technology Council, Annual Report 1992–3, PO Box 81772, Stirling Street, Perth, WA., 6849.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Western Australian Reproductive Technology Council: 1993, Draft Guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

B. Andrew Lustig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charlesworth, M. (1995). Bioethics in Australia: 1991–1993. In: Lustig, B.A. (eds) Bioethics Yearbook. Bioethics Yearbook, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0197-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0197-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0197-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics