Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 5))

  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

It is often asserted that the machine tool industry, and more broadly, the automation industry,1 is a strategic industry (see Rosenberg 1963, for a historical analysis of the U.S. machine tool industry and Jones 1983, for the present U.K. machine tool industry). More specifically, it is argued that an advanced local automation industry can be conducive to a rapid diffusion of new technology in the engineering industry and, by implication, a positive development of the competitive strength of the engineering industry. Thus, as Jones points out,

…the structure and competitiveness of the machine tool industry is very directly related to that of the engineering sector as a whole. Despite the growing degree of intra-industry trade and international specialization, there is still a strong link between a healthy domestic machine tool industry and a competitive engineering industry … countries which are An earlier version of this chapter was published in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1 (4), 1991, pp. 257-269.With automation industry we mean the industry which supplies automatic production equipment to the engineering industry. Of course, there exists an industry which supplies such equipment to the process industry as well.dependent on importing the most advanced machine tools experience a certain delay in the diffusion of the latest machining technology (Jones 1983, p. 1).

An earlier version of this chapter was published in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1 (4), 1991, pp. 257–269.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abernathy, William J. and James M. Utterback, 1975. “A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation,” Omega ,3 (6), 639-656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1984. “The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization ,5 (1), 91-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1989. “Small-Scale Industry at a Crossroads: U.S. Machine Tools in Global Perspective,” Small Business Economics ,1 (4), 245-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo and Erol Taymaz, 1993. “Technological Capabilities and International Competitiveness in the Engineering Industries.” Review of Industrial Organization ,8 (3), 293-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bandt, Jacques and M. Humbert, 1985. “La mésodynamique industrielle,” in Cahiers du CERNEA ,Nanterre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Charles and Staffan Jacobsson, 1988. Flexible Automation: The Global Diffusion of New Technology in the Engineering Industry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Christopher, 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation ,2nd edition. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, Staffan, 1986. Electronics and Industrial Policy: The Case of Computer-Controlled Lathes. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, Staffan, Christer Oskarsson and Lennart Bingens, 1989. “Industriell Elektronik i Sverige -Aktörsstruktur och Tillväxtmönster.” Report submitted to the Swedish Board for Technical Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Daniel T., 1983. “Machine Tools: Technical Change and the Japanese Challenge.” Mimeo., Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Richard, 1989. “Economic Change and the Boundaries of the Firm” in Bo Carlsson (ed.), Industrial Dynamics: Technological, Organizational and Structural Changes in Industries and Firms. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, 1985. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, 1988. “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation” in Giovanni Dosi et al. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, 1936. Capital ,I (Modern Library Edition). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E. and Charles C. Snow, 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, David, 1978. “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools and a Challenge for Labor,” Politics and Society ,8 (3-4), 313-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, Jukka, (n.d.), “Economics and Benefits of Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Conclusions for Practice,” mimeo, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan, (1963), “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910,”Journal of Economic History ,23 (4), 414-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J., 1951. “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market,” Journal of Political Economy ,59 (3), 185-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz, Erol, 1989. “Technological Capabilities and International Competitiveness: A Study on the Machine Tool Industry.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., 1987. “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy” in David J. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, Eric, 1976. “The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instruments Innovation Process,” Research Policy ,5, 212-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, Eric, 1979. “A Customer-Active Paradigm for Industrial New Product Generation” in Michael J. Baker (ed.), Industrial Innovation: Technology, Policy, Diffusion. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, Eric, 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Christopher, 1984. “Technology Push and Need Pull: A New Perspective,” R&D Management ,14 (3), 147-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner and Kolb, 1989. Data received in connection with an interview.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S. (1995). What Makes the Automation Industry Strategic?. In: Carlsson, B. (eds) Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0145-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0145-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4065-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0145-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics