Skip to main content

Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions

  • Chapter
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 10))

Abstract

This paper presents a particular method of citizen participation, the Citizens Jury1 process, as a novel way of obtaining citizen input on environmental questions. The Citizens Jury process uses random selection to impanel a group of citizens to study specific public policy issues or to review candidates in an election. The paper starts with an overview of the process, moves on to a discussion of using Citizens Juries on nuclear waste facilities and concludes with a review of how the process meets some general criteria of fairness and competency derived from the work of Jürgen Habermas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Jefferson Center has been granted a service mark by the U.S. government for the term “Citizens Jury.” This was sought in order to prevent improper use of the method.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The four, besides the Jefferson Center, which have lasted for more than five years are the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions (which lasted from the early 60’s to the mid-70’s), the Roosevelt Center (1981-1988), the Public Agenda Foundation (1976 to present) and the National Issues Forum (late 70’ s to present). The latter two are run under the auspices of the Kettering Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This approach should be compared to that of Bernard Williams who suggests that the primary question of moral philosophy should be Socrates’ question, “How should one live?”. See Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Harvard University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crosby, Edwin L. Concern For All: (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crosby, N. (1995). Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions. In: Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3518-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0131-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics