Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 71))

Abstract

The heart of Kuhn’s book Black Body Theory and the quantum discontinuity 1894–1912 is the demonstration that Planck never intended in 1900-1 to introduce the quantum discontinuity into physics, with his distribution law, as many authoritative historians maintain it. Kuhn proves that Planck was very far from conceiving the necessity of quanta when he followed, more and more closely, Boltzmann’s statistical concepts in order to find the distribution law he searched for.

We have analyzed the proofs of Kuhn’s thesis and we have discovered that the various statistical concepts “inehrited” by Planck have their common foundation in Boltzmann’s conception of infinite.

Kuhn, who is such a profound historian, could not escape from this fact. Kuhn, however, has not stressed this conceptual continuity either for giving a deeper explanation of the events of the birth of quanta, or for using that as a paradigm and saving, in this way, his work from the accusation that, in the black-body case, he was not able to use his famous interpretative scheme of the history of science.

Our conclusion on this matter is that Kuhn behaves like most of the physicists who consider mathematics as a constant of the history, and not a variable that plays a decisive role in the evolution of physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kuhn, T.S. (1978). Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894–1912 ,Oxford, Clarendon Press -New York, Oxford U.P. It. tr.: “Alle origini della fisica contemporanea. La teoria del corpo nero e la discontinuità quantica ,Il Mulino, Bologna, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn, T.S. BBT ,It.tr., p.222.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ibidem ,p.309.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ibidem ,p.238.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galison, P. (1981). “Kuhn and the quantum controversy”,British J. of Philos. of Science ,32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn, T.S. (1984). “Revisiting Planck”,in HSPS ,14:2, p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhn, T.S. BBT ,op. cit., p.88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ibidem ,2nd chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ibidem ,p.89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ibidem, p.92.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ibidem ,p.96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ibidem, p.112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ibidem ,p.115.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dugas, R. (1959). La Théorie Physique au sense de Boltzmann ,Editions du Griffon, Neuchatel.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ibidem ,pp.21-29.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhn, T.S. BBT ,op. cit., p.130.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saiello, P. Analisi storico-critica della Meccanica Statistica di Boltzmann ,Tesi di Laurea in Fisica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”,Anno accademico 1991-92, pp.162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dugas, R. La Théorie Physique au sense de Boltzmann ,op.cit., p.28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Un. of Chicago. See Cerreta, P. and Drago, A., “Matematica e conoscenza storica. L’ interpretazione di Kuhn della storia della scienza”,in L. Magnani (ed.), Conoscenza e Matematica, Marcos Y Marcos, Milano, 1991, pp.353--364.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhn, T.S. SRS, p.34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhn, T.S. “Revisiting Planck”,op. cit., p.231.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mastermann, M. “The nature of Paradigm”,in Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 170, pp.58-–89.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kuhn, T.S. “Revisiting Planck”,op. cit., p.245.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Drago, A. (1990), “I quattro modelli di teoria scientifica”,Epistemologia, 13 pp.303~324; “Il concetto di rivoluzione scientifica nella storia della scienza”,in Bevilacqua, F. (ed.): Atti del XII Congresso Nazionale di Storia della Fisica, L’Aquila, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kuhn, T.S. “Revisiting Planck”,op. cit., p.245.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhn, T.S. (1980). “The halt and the blind: philosophy and history of science”,Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 31, p.185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cerreta, P. (1995). Kuhn’s Interpretation of Boltzmann’s Statistical Heredity in Planck. In: Garola, C., Rossi, A. (eds) The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — Historical Analysis and Open Questions. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics